Superregnum: Eukaryota
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Cladus: Craniata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Superclassis: Tetrapoda
Cladus: Reptiliomorpha
Cladus: Amniota
Classis: Reptilia
Cladi: Parareptilia – Eureptilia
Overview of extant ordines: Crocodilia – Rhynchocephalia – Saurischia – Squamata – Testudines
Genera incertae sedis: †Revueltosaurus
Name
Reptilia Laurenti, 1768
Classifications
Main page: Reptilia (classifications).
References
Benton, M. J. (2004), Vertebrate Paleontology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science Ltd University of Bristol taxonomic hierarchy of the vertebrates
Carroll, RL (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, WH Freeman & Co.
Cogălniceanu, D. et al. 2013: Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania. ZooKeys, 341: 49–76. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.341.5502 Reference page.
Davis, D.R. & LaDuc, T.J. 2018. Amphibians and reptiles of C. E. Miller Ranch and the Sierra Vieja, Chihuahuan Desert, Texas, USA. ZooKeys 735: 97–130. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.735.22200. Reference page.
Davis, D.R. & LaDuc, T.J. 2018. Corrigenda: Davis DR, LaDuc TJ (2018) Amphibians and reptiles of C. E. Miller Ranch and the Sierra Vieja, Chihuahuan Desert, Texas, USA. ZooKeys 735:97–130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.735.22200. ZooKeys 744: 149–149. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.744.25059. Reference page.
Flores-Villela, O.; Reynoso, V.H.; Magaña-Cota, G. 2010: More notes on Alfredo Dugès’ names for Mexican reptilian taxa. Zootaxa, 2600: 66–68. Preview
García-Díez, T.; González-Fernández, J.E. 2013: The reptile type specimens preserved in the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) of Madrid, Spain. Zootaxa 3619(1): 46–58. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3619.1.2 Reference page.
Ibrahim, N., Sereno, P.C., Varricchio, D.J., Martill, D.M., Dutheil, D.B., Unwin, D.M., Baidder, L., Larsson, H.C.E., Zouhri, S. & Kaoukaya, A. 2020. Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco. ZooKeys 928: 1–216. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.928.47517 Open access Reference page.
Kaiser, H. et al. 2011: The herpetofauna of Timor-Leste: a first report. ZooKeys, 109: 19–86. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.109.1439
Krysko, K.L. et al. 2011: Verified non-indigenous amphibians and reptiles in Florida from 1863 through 2010: outlining the invasion process and identifying invasion pathways and stages. Zootaxa, 3028: 1–64. Preview
Krysko, K.L. et al. 2012: Taxonomic corrections of certain verified non-indigenous reptiles from Florida reported by Krysko et al. (2011). Zootaxa, 3199: 66–68. Preview
McCranie, J.R. 2015: A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Honduras, with additions, comments on taxonomy, some recent taxonomic decisions, and areas of further studies needed. Zootaxa 3931(3): 352–386. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3931.3.2. Reference page.
Miranda, J.P.; Costa, J.C.L.; Rocha, C.F.D. 2012: Reptiles from Lençóis Maranhenses National Park, Maranhão, northeastern Brazil. ZooKeys 246: 51–68. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.246.2593 Reference page.
Palacios-Aguilar, R. & Flores-Villela, O. 2018. An updated checklist of the herpetofauna from Guerrero, Mexico. Zootaxa 4422(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4422.1.1 Open access Reference page.
Pauly, G.B.; Hillis, D.M.; Cannatella, D.C. 2009: Taxonomic freedom and the role of official lists of species names. Herpetologica, 65: 115–128. DOI: 10.1655/08-031R1.1
Razzetti, E. et al. 2011: Annotated checklist and distribution of the Socotran Archipelago Herpetofauna (Reptilia). Zootaxa, 2826: 1–44. Preview
Rivas, G.A. et al. 2012: Reptiles of Venezuela: an updated and commented checklist. Zootaxa, 3211: 1–64. Preview
Savage, J.M.; Bolaños, F. 2009: A checklist of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica: additions and nomenclatural revisions. Zootaxa, 2005: 1–23. Abstract & excerpt
Speybroeck, J.; Beukema, W.; Crochet, P.A. 2010: A tentative species list of the European herpetofauna (Amphibia and Reptilia) — an update. Zootaxa, 2492: 1–27. Preview
Uetz, P. 2010: The original descriptions of reptiles. Zootaxa, 2334: 59–68. Preview PDF
Uetz, P. et al. 1995-2012. The Reptile Database.
Young, C.C. & Dong, Z-M. 1972. On the aquatic reptiles of the Triassic in China. Memoir of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Palaeoanthropology 9: 11-34.
Additional references
Ceríaco, L.M.P., Marques, M.P. & Bauer, A.M. 2018. Miscellanea Herpetologica Sanctithomae, with a provisional checklist of the terrestrial herpetofauna of São Tomé, Príncipe and Annobon islands. Zootaxa 4387(1): 91–108. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4387.1.4 Reference page.
Fatihah-Syafiq, M., Badli-Sham, B.H., Fahmi-Ahmad, M., Aqmal-Naser, M., Rizal, S.A., Azmi, M.S.A., Grismer, L.L. & Ahmad, A.B. 2020. Checklist of herpetofauna in the severely degraded ecosystem of Bidong Island, Peninsular Malaysia, South China Sea. ZooKeys, 985: 143–162. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.985.54737 Open access Reference page.
Flores-Villela, O., Ríos-Muñoz, C.A., Magaña-Cota, G.E. & Quezadas-Tapia, N.L. 2016. Alfredo Dugès’ type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited. Zootaxa 4092(1): 33–54. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4092.1.2.Reference page.
de Freitas, M.A., Vieira, R.S., Entiauspe-Neto, O.M., Sousa, S.O. e, Farias, T., Sousa, A.G. & de Moura, G.J.B. 2017. Herpetofauna of the Northwest Amazon forest in the state of Maranhão, Brazil, with remarks on the Gurupi Biological Reserve. Zookeys, 643: 141–155. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.643.8215. Reference page.
de la Vega-Pérez, A.H., Jiménez-Arcos, V.H., Centenero-Alcalá, E., Méndez-de la Cruz, F.R. & Ngo, A. 2019. Diversity and conservation of amphibians and reptiles of a protected and heavily disturbed forest of central Mexico. Zookeys, 830: 111–125. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.830.31490 Reference page.
Gray, R. & Strine, C.T. 2017. Herpetofaunal assemblages of a lowland broadleaf forest, an overgrown orchard forest and a lime orchard in Stann Creek, Belize. ZooKeys 707: 131–165. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.707.14029. Reference page.
Lee, K-H., Chen, T-H., Shang, G., Clulow, S., Yang, Y-J. & Lin, S-M. 2019. A check list and population trends of invasive amphibians and reptiles in Taiwan. Zookeys, 829: 85–130. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.829.27535 Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A. & Smith, G.R. 2016. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison with adjoining states. ZooKeys 593: 117–137. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484. Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A. & Smith, G.R. 2020. A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sinaloa, Mexico with a conservation status summary and comparisons with neighboring states. ZooKeys, 931: 85–114. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.931.50922 Open access Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Smith, G. & Cruz, A. 2016. Amphibians and Reptiles of the state of Nuevo León, Mexico. ZooKeys 594: 123–141. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.594.8289. Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Smith, G.R., Woolrich-Piña, G.A. & Cruz, A. 2017. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 658: 105–130. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.658.10665. Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Smith, G.R., Gadsden-Esparza, H., Valdez-Lares, R. & Woolrich-Piña, G.A. 2018. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Durango, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 748: 65–87. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.748.22768. Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Smith, G.R. & Rorabaugh, J.C. 2019. A conservation checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Sonora, Mexico, with updated species lists. Zookeys, 829: 131–160. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.829.32146 Reference page.
Lemos-Espinal, J.A., Smith, G.R. & Woolrich-Piña, G.A. 2018. Amphibians and reptiles of the state of San Luis Potosí, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states. ZooKeys 753: 83–106. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.753.21094. Reference page.
Luz, N.M.C. de la, Lemos-Espinal, J.A. & Smith, G.R. 2016. A diversity and conservation inventory of the Herpetofauna of the Cuautlapan Valley, Veracruz, Mexico. Zootaxa 4205(2): 127–142. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4205.2.2. Reference page.
Moraes, L.J.C.L., Almeida, A.P., Fraga, R., Zamora, R.R., Pirani, R.M., Silva, A.A.A., Carvalho, V.T., Gordo, M. & Werneck, F.P. 2017. Integrative overview of the herpetofauna from Serra da Mocidade, a granitic mountain range in Northern Brazil. ZooKeys 715: 103—159. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.715.20288 Open access Reference page.
Ortiz-Yusty, C.E., Daza, J.M., Paez, V.P. & Bock, B.C. 2015. The collection of the Herpetological Museum of the University of Antioquia (northwestern Colombia). Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e1325. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e1325. Reference page.
Rödel, M-O. & Glos, J. 2019. Herpetological surveys in two proposed protected areas in Liberia, West Africa. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 95: 15–35. DOI: 10.3897/zse.95.31726 Reference page.
Sanguila, M.B., Cobb, K.A., Siler, C.D., Diesmos, A.C., Alcala, A.C. & Brown, R.M. 2016. The amphibians and reptiles of Mindanao Island, southern Philippines, II: the herpetofauna of northeast Mindanao and adjacent islands. ZooKeys 624: 1–132. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.624.9814 Open access. Reference page.
Suraprasit, K., Jaeger, J.J., Chaimanee, Y., Chavasseau, O., Yamee, C., Tian, P. & Panha, S. 2016. The Middle Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from Khok Sung (Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand): biochronological and paleobiogeographical implications. ZooKeys 613: 1-157. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.613.8309. Reference page.
Uetz, P. & Stylianou, A. 2018. The original descriptions of reptiles and their subspecies. Zootaxa 4375(2): 257–264. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4375.2.5. Full article (PDF) Reference page.
Vernacular names
azərbaycanca: Sürünənlər
Boarisch: Kriachviecher, Reptilien
беларуская: Паўзуны
বাংলা: সরীসৃপ
català: Rèptils
čeština: Plazi
dansk: Krybdyr
Deutsch: Reptilien
Ελληνικά: Ερπετά
English: Reptiles
español: Reptiles
suomi: Matelijat
Nordfriisk: Krepdiarten
français: Reptiles
galego: Réptiles
Hawaiʻi: Mo‘ohana
עברית: זוחלים
magyar: hüllők
հայերեն: Սողուններ
íslenska: Skriðdýr
italiano: Rettili
日本語: 爬虫綱
ქართული: ქვეწარმავლები
한국어: 파충강
lietuvių: Ropliai
မြန်မာဘာသာ: တွားသွားသတ္တဝါ
Nederlands: Reptielen
norsk: Krypdyr
ଓଡ଼ିଆ: ସରିସୃପ
polski: Gady
português: Réptil
română: Reptile
русский: Пресмыкающиеся, Рептилии
slovenčina: Plazy
slovenščina: Plazilci
shqip: Zvarranikët, Rreptilët
svenska: Kräldjur
ไทย: สัตว์เลื้อยคลาน
Tagalog: Bayabag
Türkçe: Sürüngenler
українська: Плазуни
Tiếng Việt: Động vật bò sát
中文: 爬蟲類
Reptiles, as most commonly defined, are the animals in the class Reptilia /rɛpˈtɪliə/, a paraphyletic grouping comprising all amniotes except synapsids (mammals and their extinct relatives) and Aves (birds).[1] Living reptiles comprise turtles, crocodilians, squamates (lizards & snakes) and rhynchocephalians (tuatara). In the traditional Linnaean classification system, birds are considered a separate class to reptiles. However, crocodilians are more closely related to birds than they are to other living reptiles, and so modern cladistic classification systems include birds within Reptilia, redefining the term as a clade. Other cladistic definitions abandon the term reptile altogether in favor of the clade Sauropsida, which refers to all animals more closely related to modern reptiles than to mammals. The study of the traditional reptile orders, historically combined with that of modern amphibians, is called herpetology.
The earliest known proto-reptiles originated around 312 million years ago during the Carboniferous period, having evolved from advanced reptiliomorph tetrapods which became increasingly adapted to life on dry land. The earliest known eureptile ("true reptile") was Hylonomus, a small and superficially lizard-like animal. Genetic and fossil data argues that the two largest lineages of reptiles, Archosauromorpha (crocodilians, birds and kin) and Lepidosauromorpha (lizards and kin), diverged near the end of the Permian period.[2] In addition to the living reptiles, there are many diverse groups that are now extinct, in some cases due to mass extinction events. In particular, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event wiped out the pterosaurs, plesiosaurs, and all non-avian dinosaurs alongside many species of crocodyliforms, and squamates (e.g., mosasaurs). Modern non-bird reptiles inhabit all the continents except Antarctica.
Reptiles are tetrapod vertebrates, creatures that either have four limbs or, like snakes, are descended from four-limbed ancestors. Unlike amphibians, reptiles do not have an aquatic larval stage. Most reptiles are oviparous, although several species of squamates are viviparous, as were some extinct aquatic clades[3] – the fetus develops within the mother, using a (non-mammalian) placenta rather than contained in an eggshell. As amniotes, reptile eggs are surrounded by membranes for protection and transport, which adapt them to reproduction on dry land. Many of the viviparous species feed their fetuses through various forms of placenta analogous to those of mammals, with some providing initial care for their hatchlings. Extant reptiles range in size from a tiny gecko, Sphaerodactylus ariasae, which can grow up to 17 mm (0.7 in) to the saltwater crocodile, Crocodylus porosus, which can reach 6 m (19.7 ft) in length and weigh over 1,000 kg (2,200 lb).
Classification
See also: List of reptiles
Research history
See also: Skull roof
Reptiles, from Nouveau Larousse Illustré, 1897–1904, notice the inclusion of amphibians (below the crocodiles)
In the 13th century the category of reptile was recognized in Europe as consisting of a miscellany of egg-laying creatures, including "snakes, various fantastic monsters, lizards, assorted amphibians, and worms", as recorded by Vincent of Beauvais in his Mirror of Nature.[4] In the 18th century, the reptiles were, from the outset of classification, grouped with the amphibians. Linnaeus, working from species-poor Sweden, where the common adder and grass snake are often found hunting in water, included all reptiles and amphibians in class "III – Amphibia" in his Systema Naturæ.[5] The terms reptile and amphibian were largely interchangeable, reptile (from Latin repere, 'to creep') being preferred by the French.[6] Josephus Nicolaus Laurenti was the first to formally use the term Reptilia for an expanded selection of reptiles and amphibians basically similar to that of Linnaeus.[7] Today, the two groups are still commonly treated under the single heading herpetology.
"Antediluvian monster", a Mosasaurus discovered in a Maastricht limestone quarry, 1770 (contemporary engraving)
It was not until the beginning of the 19th century that it became clear that reptiles and amphibians are, in fact, quite different animals, and Pierre André Latreille erected the class Batracia (1825) for the latter, dividing the tetrapods into the four familiar classes of reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals.[8] The British anatomist Thomas Henry Huxley made Latreille's definition popular and, together with Richard Owen, expanded Reptilia to include the various fossil "antediluvian monsters", including dinosaurs and the mammal-like (synapsid) Dicynodon he helped describe. This was not the only possible classification scheme: In the Hunterian lectures delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1863, Huxley grouped the vertebrates into mammals, sauroids, and ichthyoids (the latter containing the fishes and amphibians). He subsequently proposed the names of Sauropsida and Ichthyopsida for the latter two groups.[9] In 1866, Haeckel demonstrated that vertebrates could be divided based on their reproductive strategies, and that reptiles, birds, and mammals were united by the amniotic egg.
The terms Sauropsida ('lizard faces') and Theropsida ('beast faces') were used again in 1916 by E.S. Goodrich to distinguish between lizards, birds, and their relatives on the one hand (Sauropsida) and mammals and their extinct relatives (Theropsida) on the other. Goodrich supported this division by the nature of the hearts and blood vessels in each group, and other features, such as the structure of the forebrain. According to Goodrich, both lineages evolved from an earlier stem group, Protosauria ("first lizards") in which he included some animals today considered reptile-like amphibians, as well as early reptiles.[10]
In 1956, D.M.S. Watson observed that the first two groups diverged very early in reptilian history, so he divided Goodrich's Protosauria between them. He also reinterpreted Sauropsida and Theropsida to exclude birds and mammals, respectively. Thus his Sauropsida included Procolophonia, Eosuchia, Millerosauria, Chelonia (turtles), Squamata (lizards and snakes), Rhynchocephalia, Crocodilia, "thecodonts" (paraphyletic basal Archosauria), non-avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs, ichthyosaurs, and sauropterygians.[11]
In the late 19th century, a number of definitions of Reptilia were offered. The traits listed by Lydekker in 1896, for example, include a single occipital condyle, a jaw joint formed by the quadrate and articular bones, and certain characteristics of the vertebrae.[12] The animals singled out by these formulations, the amniotes other than the mammals and the birds, are still those considered reptiles today.[13]
The first reptiles had an anapsid type of skull roof, as seen in the Permian genus Captorhinus
The synapsid/sauropsid division supplemented another approach, one that split the reptiles into four subclasses based on the number and position of temporal fenestrae, openings in the sides of the skull behind the eyes. This classification was initiated by Henry Fairfield Osborn and elaborated and made popular by Romer's classic Vertebrate Paleontology.[14][15] Those four subclasses were:
Anapsida – no fenestrae – cotylosaurs and Chelonia (turtles and relatives)[note 1]
Synapsida – one low fenestra – pelycosaurs and therapsids (the 'mammal-like reptiles')
Euryapsida – one high fenestra (above the postorbital and squamosal) – protorosaurs (small, early lizard-like reptiles) and the marine sauropterygians and ichthyosaurs, the latter called Parapsida in Osborn's work.
Diapsida – two fenestrae – most reptiles, including lizards, snakes, crocodilians, dinosaurs and pterosaurs
Phylogenetic classifications group the traditional "mammal-like reptiles", like this Varanodon, with other synapsids, not with extant reptiles
The composition of Euryapsida was uncertain. Ichthyosaurs were, at times, considered to have arisen independently of the other euryapsids, and given the older name Parapsida. Parapsida was later discarded as a group for the most part (ichthyosaurs being classified as incertae sedis or with Euryapsida). However, four (or three if Euryapsida is merged into Diapsida) subclasses remained more or less universal for non-specialist work throughout the 20th century. It has largely been abandoned by recent researchers: In particular, the anapsid condition has been found to occur so variably among unrelated groups that it is not now considered a useful distinction.[16]
Phylogenetics and modern definition
By the early 21st century, vertebrate paleontologists were beginning to adopt phylogenetic taxonomy, in which all groups are defined in such a way as to be monophyletic; that is, groups which include all descendants of a particular ancestor. The reptiles as historically defined are paraphyletic, since they exclude both birds and mammals. These respectively evolved from dinosaurs and from early therapsids, which were both traditionally called reptiles.[17] Birds are more closely related to crocodilians than the latter are to the rest of extant reptiles. Colin Tudge wrote:
Mammals are a clade, and therefore the cladists are happy to acknowledge the traditional taxon Mammalia; and birds, too, are a clade, universally ascribed to the formal taxon Aves. Mammalia and Aves are, in fact, subclades within the grand clade of the Amniota. But the traditional class Reptilia is not a clade. It is just a section of the clade Amniota: the section that is left after the Mammalia and Aves have been hived off. It cannot be defined by synapomorphies, as is the proper way. Instead, it is defined by a combination of the features it has and the features it lacks: reptiles are the amniotes that lack fur or feathers. At best, the cladists suggest, we could say that the traditional Reptilia are 'non-avian, non-mammalian amniotes'.[13]
Despite the early proposals for replacing the paraphyletic Reptilia with a monophyletic Sauropsida, which includes birds, that term was never adopted widely or, when it was, was not applied consistently.[18]
Bearded dragon (pogona) skeleton on display at the Museum of Osteology
When Sauropsida was used, it often had the same content or even the same definition as Reptilia. In 1988, Jacques Gauthier proposed a cladistic definition of Reptilia as a monophyletic node-based crown group containing turtles, lizards and snakes, crocodilians, and birds, their common ancestor and all its descendants. While Gauthier's definition was close to the modern consensus, nonetheless, it became considered inadequate because the actual relationship of turtles to other reptiles was not yet well understood at this time.[18] Major revisions since have included the reassignment of synapsids as non-reptiles, and classification of turtles as diapsids.[18]
A variety of other definitions were proposed by other scientists in the years following Gauthier's paper. The first such new definition, which attempted to adhere to the standards of the PhyloCode, was published by Modesto and Anderson in 2004. Modesto and Anderson reviewed the many previous definitions and proposed a modified definition, which they intended to retain most traditional content of the group while keeping it stable and monophyletic. They defined Reptilia as all amniotes closer to Lacerta agilis and Crocodylus niloticus than to Homo sapiens. This stem-based definition is equivalent to the more common definition of Sauropsida, which Modesto and Anderson synonymized with Reptilia, since the latter is better known and more frequently used. Unlike most previous definitions of Reptilia, however, Modesto and Anderson's definition includes birds,[18] as they are within the clade that includes both lizards and crocodiles.[18]
Taxonomy
See also: List of reptiles and List of snakes
General classification of extinct and living reptiles, focusing on major groups.[19][20]
Reptilia/Sauropsida
†Parareptilia
Eureptilia
†Captorhinidae
Diapsida
†Araeoscelidia
Neodiapsida
†Drepanosauromorpha (placement uncertain)
†Younginiformes (paraphyletic)
†Ichthyosauromorpha (placement uncertain)
†Thalattosauria (placement uncertain)
Sauria
Lepidosauromorpha
Lepidosauriformes
Rhynchocephalia (tuatara)
Squamata (lizards & snakes)
†Choristodera (placement uncertain)
†Sauropterygia (placement uncertain)
Pantestudines (turtles and kin, placement uncertain)
Archosauromorpha
†Protorosauria (paraphyletic)
†Rhynchosauria
†Allokotosauria
Archosauriformes
†Phytosauria
Archosauria
Pseudosuchia
Crocodilia (crocodilians)
Avemetatarsalia/Ornithodira
†Pterosauria
Dinosauria
†Ornithischia
Saurischia (including birds (Aves))
Phylogeny
The cladogram presented here illustrates the "family tree" of reptiles, and follows a simplified version of the relationships found by M.S. Lee, in 2013.[21] All genetic studies have supported the hypothesis that turtles are diapsids; some have placed turtles within Archosauromorpha,[21][22][23][24][25][26] though a few have recovered turtles as Lepidosauromorpha instead.[27] The cladogram below used a combination of genetic (molecular) and fossil (morphological) data to obtain its results.[21]
| Amniota |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_(Varanus_griseus).png/80px-Zoology_of_Egypt_(1898)_(Varanus_griseus).png)
.jpg/80px-Trilophosaurus_buettneri_(flipped).jpg){kind=small}
_(Crocodylus_moreletii).jpg/80px-thumbnail.jpg){kind=small}
_(Antwerpener_Breiftaube).jpg/40px-Meyers_grosses_Konversations-Lexikon_-_ein_Nachschlagewerk_des_allgemeinen_Wissens_(1908)_(Antwerpener_Breiftaube).jpg){kind=small}
The position of turtles
The placement of turtles has historically been highly variable. Classically, turtles were considered to be related to the primitive anapsid reptiles.[28] Molecular work has usually placed turtles within the diapsids. As of 2013, three turtle genomes have been sequenced.[29] The results place turtles as a sister clade to the archosaurs, the group that includes crocodiles, dinosaurs, and birds.[30] However, in their comparative analysis of the timing of organogenesis, Werneburg and Sánchez-Villagra (2009) found support for the hypothesis that turtles belong to a separate clade within Sauropsida, outside the saurian clade altogether.[31]
Evolutionary history
Main article: Evolution of reptiles
Origin of the reptiles
An early reptile Hylonomus
Mesozoic scene showing typical reptilian megafauna: dinosaurs including Europasaurus holgeri, iguanodonts, and Archaeopteryx lithographica perched on the foreground tree stump
The origin of the reptiles lies about 310–320 million years ago, in the steaming swamps of the late Carboniferous period, when the first reptiles evolved from advanced reptiliomorphs.[32]
The oldest known animal that may have been an amniote is Casineria (though it may have been a temnospondyl).[33][34][35] A series of footprints from the fossil strata of Nova Scotia dated to 315 Ma show typical reptilian toes and imprints of scales.[36] These tracks are attributed to Hylonomus, the oldest unquestionable reptile known.[37] It was a small, lizard-like animal, about 20 to 30 centimetres (7.9 to 11.8 in) long, with numerous sharp teeth indicating an insectivorous diet.[38] Other examples include Westlothiana (for the moment considered a reptiliomorph rather than a true amniote)[39] and Paleothyris, both of similar build and presumably similar habit.
However, microsaurs have been at times considered true reptiles, so an earlier origin is possible.[40]
Rise of the reptiles
The earliest amniotes, including stem-reptiles (those amniotes closer to modern reptiles than to mammals), were largely overshadowed by larger stem-tetrapods, such as Cochleosaurus, and remained a small, inconspicuous part of the fauna until the Carboniferous Rainforest Collapse.[41] This sudden collapse affected several large groups. Primitive tetrapods were particularly devastated, while stem-reptiles fared better, being ecologically adapted to the drier conditions that followed. Primitive tetrapods, like modern amphibians, need to return to water to lay eggs; in contrast, amniotes, like modern reptiles – whose eggs possess a shell that allows them to be laid on land – were better adapted to the new conditions. Amniotes acquired new niches at a faster rate than before the collapse and at a much faster rate than primitive tetrapods. They acquired new feeding strategies including herbivory and carnivory, previously only having been insectivores and piscivores.[41] From this point forward, reptiles dominated communities and had a greater diversity than primitive tetrapods, setting the stage for the Mesozoic (known as the Age of Reptiles).[42] One of the best known early stem-reptiles is Mesosaurus, a genus from the Early Permian that had returned to water, feeding on fish.
A 2021 examination of reptile diversity in the Carboniferous and Permian suggests a much higher degree of diversity than previously thought, comparable or even exceeding that of synapsids. Thus, the "First Age of Reptiles" was proposed.[40]
Anapsids, synapsids, diapsids, and sauropsids
A = Anapsid,
B = Synapsid,
C = Diapsid
It was traditionally assumed that the first reptiles retained an anapsid skull inherited from their ancestors.[43] This type of skull has a skull roof with only holes for the nostrils, eyes and a pineal eye.[28] The discoveries of synapsid-like openings (see below) in the skull roof of the skulls of several members of Parareptilia (the clade containing most of the amniotes traditionally referred to as "anapsids"), including lanthanosuchoids, millerettids, bolosaurids, some nycteroleterids, some procolophonoids and at least some mesosaurs[44][45][46] made it more ambiguous and it's currently uncertain whether the ancestral amniote had an anapsid-like or synapsid-like skull.[46] These animals are traditionally referred to as "anapsids", and form a paraphyletic basic stock from which other groups evolved.[18] Very shortly after the first amniotes appeared, a lineage called Synapsida split off; this group was characterized by a temporal opening in the skull behind each eye to give room for the jaw muscle to move. These are the "mammal-like amniotes", or stem-mammals, that later gave rise to the true mammals.[47] Soon after, another group evolved a similar trait, this time with a double opening behind each eye, earning them the name Diapsida ("two arches").[43] The function of the holes in these groups was to lighten the skull and give room for the jaw muscles to move, allowing for a more powerful bite.[28]
Turtles have been traditionally believed to be surviving parareptiles, on the basis of their anapsid skull structure, which was assumed to be primitive trait.[48] The rationale for this classification has been disputed, with some arguing that turtles are diapsids that evolved anapsid skulls in order to improve their armor.[32] Later morphological phylogenetic studies with this in mind placed turtles firmly within Diapsida.[49] All molecular studies have strongly upheld the placement of turtles within diapsids, most commonly as a sister group to extant archosaurs.[23][24][25][26]
Permian reptiles
With the close of the Carboniferous, the amniotes became the dominant tetrapod fauna. While primitive, terrestrial reptiliomorphs still existed, the synapsid amniotes evolved the first truly terrestrial megafauna (giant animals) in the form of pelycosaurs, such as Edaphosaurus and the carnivorous Dimetrodon. In the mid-Permian period, the climate became drier, resulting in a change of fauna: The pelycosaurs were replaced by the therapsids.[50]
The parareptiles, whose massive skull roofs had no postorbital holes, continued and flourished throughout the Permian. The pareiasaurian parareptiles reached giant proportions in the late Permian, eventually disappearing at the close of the period (the turtles being possible survivors).[50]
Early in the period, the modern reptiles, or crown-group reptiles, evolved and split into two main lineages: the Archosauromorpha (forebears of turtles, crocodiles, and dinosaurs) and the Lepidosauromorpha (predecessors of modern lizards and tuataras). Both groups remained lizard-like and relatively small and inconspicuous during the Permian.
Mesozoic reptiles
The close of the Permian saw the greatest mass extinction known (see the Permian–Triassic extinction event), an event prolonged by the combination of two or more distinct extinction pulses.[51] Most of the earlier parareptile and synapsid megafauna disappeared, being replaced by the true reptiles, particularly archosauromorphs. These were characterized by elongated hind legs and an erect pose, the early forms looking somewhat like long-legged crocodiles. The archosaurs became the dominant group during the Triassic period, though it took 30 million years before their diversity was as great as the animals that lived in the Permian.[51] Archosaurs developed into the well-known dinosaurs and pterosaurs, as well as the ancestors of crocodiles. Since reptiles, first rauisuchians and then dinosaurs, dominated the Mesozoic era, the interval is popularly known as the "Age of Reptiles". The dinosaurs also developed smaller forms, including the feather-bearing smaller theropods. In the Cretaceous period, these gave rise to the first true birds.[52]
The sister group to Archosauromorpha is Lepidosauromorpha, containing lizards and tuataras, as well as their fossil relatives. Lepidosauromorpha contained at least one major group of the Mesozoic sea reptiles: the mosasaurs, which lived during the Cretaceous period. The phylogenetic placement of other main groups of fossil sea reptiles – the ichthyopterygians (including ichthyosaurs) and the sauropterygians, which evolved in the early Triassic – is more controversial. Different authors linked these groups either to lepidosauromorphs[1] or to archosauromorphs,[53][54][55] and ichthyopterygians were also argued to be diapsids that did not belong to the least inclusive clade containing lepidosauromorphs and archosauromorphs.[56]
Cenozoic reptiles
Varanus priscus was a giant carnivorous goanna lizard, perhaps as long as 7 metres and weighing up to 1940 kilograms[57]
Skeleton of Champsosaurus, a choristodere, the latest surviving order of extinct reptiles. The last known choristoderes are known from the Miocene, around 11.3 million years ago
The close of the Cretaceous period saw the demise of the Mesozoic era reptilian megafauna (see the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, also known as K-T extinction event). Of the large marine reptiles, only sea turtles were left; and of the non-marine large reptiles, only the semi-aquatic crocodiles and broadly similar choristoderes survived the extinction, with last members of the latter, the lizard-like Lazarussuchus, becoming extinct in the Miocene.[58] Of the great host of dinosaurs dominating the Mesozoic, only the small beaked birds survived. This dramatic extinction pattern at the end of the Mesozoic led into the Cenozoic. Mammals and birds filled the empty niches left behind by the reptilian megafauna and, while reptile diversification slowed, bird and mammal diversification took an exponential turn.[42] However, reptiles were still important components of the megafauna, particularly in the form of large and giant tortoises.[59][60]
After the extinction of most archosaur and marine reptile lines by the end of the Cretaceous, reptile diversification continued throughout the Cenozoic. Squamates took a massive hit during the K–Pg event, only recovering ten million years after it,[61] but they underwent a great radiation event once they recovered, and today squamates make up the majority of living reptiles (> 95%).[62][63] Approximately 10,000 extant species of traditional reptiles are known, with birds adding about 10,000 more, almost twice the number of mammals, represented by about 5,700 living species (excluding domesticated species).[64]
| Reptile group | Described species | Percent of reptile species |
|---|---|---|
| Squamates | 9193 | 96.3% |
| - Lizards | 5634 | 59% |
| - Snakes | 3378 | 35% |
| - Amphisbaenians | 181 | 2% |
| Turtles | 327 | 3.4% |
| Crocodilians | 25 | 0.3% |
| Rhynchocephalians | 1 | 0.01% |
| Total | 9546 | 100% |
Morphology and physiology
Circulation
Thermographic image of monitor lizards
All lepidosaurs and turtles have a three-chambered heart consisting of two atria, one variably partitioned ventricle, and two aortas that lead to the systemic circulation. The degree of mixing of oxygenated and deoxygenated blood in the three-chambered heart varies depending on the species and physiological state. Under different conditions, deoxygenated blood can be shunted back to the body or oxygenated blood can be shunted back to the lungs. This variation in blood flow has been hypothesized to allow more effective thermoregulation and longer diving times for aquatic species, but has not been shown to be a fitness advantage.[66]
Juvenile Iguana heart bisected through the ventricle, bisecting the left and right atrium
For example, Iguana hearts, like the majority of the squamates hearts, are composed of three chambers with two aorta and one ventricle, cardiac involuntary muscles.[67] The main structures of the heart are the sinus venosus, the pacemaker, the left atrium, the right atrium, the atrioventricular valve, the cavum venosum, cavum arteriosum, the cavum pulmonale, the muscular ridge, the ventricular ridge, pulmonary veins, and paired aortic arches.[68]
Some squamate species (e.g., pythons and monitor lizards) have three-chambered hearts that become functionally four-chambered hearts during contraction. This is made possible by a muscular ridge that subdivides the ventricle during ventricular diastole and completely divides it during ventricular systole. Because of this ridge, some of these squamates are capable of producing ventricular pressure differentials that are equivalent to those seen in mammalian and avian hearts.[69]
Crocodilians have an anatomically four-chambered heart, similar to birds, but also have two systemic aortas and are therefore capable of bypassing their pulmonary circulation.[70]
Metabolism
Sustained energy output (joules) of a typical reptile versus a similar size mammal as a function of core body temperature. The mammal has a much higher peak output, but can only function over a very narrow range of body temperature.
Modern non-avian reptiles exhibit some form of cold-bloodedness (i.e. some mix of poikilothermy, ectothermy, and bradymetabolism) so that they have limited physiological means of keeping the body temperature constant and often rely on external sources of heat. Due to a less stable core temperature than birds and mammals, reptilian biochemistry requires enzymes capable of maintaining efficiency over a greater range of temperatures than in the case for warm-blooded animals. The optimum body temperature range varies with species, but is typically below that of warm-blooded animals; for many lizards, it falls in the 24°–35 °C (75°–95 °F) range,[71] while extreme heat-adapted species, like the American desert iguana Dipsosaurus dorsalis, can have optimal physiological temperatures in the mammalian range, between 35° and 40 °C (95° and 104 °F).[72] While the optimum temperature is often encountered when the animal is active, the low basal metabolism makes body temperature drop rapidly when the animal is inactive.
As in all animals, reptilian muscle action produces heat. In large reptiles, like leatherback turtles, the low surface-to-volume ratio allows this metabolically produced heat to keep the animals warmer than their environment even though they do not have a warm-blooded metabolism.[73] This form of homeothermy is called gigantothermy; it has been suggested as having been common in large dinosaurs and other extinct large-bodied reptiles.[74][75]
The benefit of a low resting metabolism is that it requires far less fuel to sustain bodily functions. By using temperature variations in their surroundings, or by remaining cold when they do not need to move, reptiles can save considerable amounts of energy compared to endothermic animals of the same size.[76] A crocodile needs from a tenth to a fifth of the food necessary for a lion of the same weight and can live half a year without eating.[77] Lower food requirements and adaptive metabolisms allow reptiles to dominate the animal life in regions where net calorie availability is too low to sustain large-bodied mammals and birds.
It is generally assumed that reptiles are unable to produce the sustained high energy output necessary for long distance chases or flying.[78] Higher energetic capacity might have been responsible for the evolution of warm-bloodedness in birds and mammals.[79] However, investigation of correlations between active capacity and thermophysiology show a weak relationship.[80] Most extant reptiles are carnivores with a sit-and-wait feeding strategy; whether reptiles are cold blooded due to their ecology is not clear. Energetic studies on some reptiles have shown active capacities equal to or greater than similar sized warm-blooded animals.[81]
Respiratory system
File:X-ray video of a female American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) while breathing - pone.0004497.s009.ogvPlay media
X-ray fluoroscopy videos of a female American alligator showing contraction of the lungs while breathing
All reptiles breathe using lungs. Aquatic turtles have developed more permeable skin, and some species have modified their cloaca to increase the area for gas exchange.[82] Even with these adaptations, breathing is never fully accomplished without lungs. Lung ventilation is accomplished differently in each main reptile group. In squamates, the lungs are ventilated almost exclusively by the axial musculature. This is also the same musculature that is used during locomotion. Because of this constraint, most squamates are forced to hold their breath during intense runs. Some, however, have found a way around it. Varanids, and a few other lizard species, employ buccal pumping as a complement to their normal "axial breathing". This allows the animals to completely fill their lungs during intense locomotion, and thus remain aerobically active for a long time. Tegu lizards are known to possess a proto-diaphragm, which separates the pulmonary cavity from the visceral cavity. While not actually capable of movement, it does allow for greater lung inflation, by taking the weight of the viscera off the lungs.[83]
Crocodilians actually have a muscular diaphragm that is analogous to the mammalian diaphragm. The difference is that the muscles for the crocodilian diaphragm pull the pubis (part of the pelvis, which is movable in crocodilians) back, which brings the liver down, thus freeing space for the lungs to expand. This type of diaphragmatic setup has been referred to as the "hepatic piston". The airways form a number of double tubular chambers within each lung. On inhalation and exhalation air moves through the airways in the same direction, thus creating a unidirectional airflow through the lungs. A similar system is found in birds,[84] monitor lizards[85] and iguanas.[86]
Most reptiles lack a secondary palate, meaning that they must hold their breath while swallowing. Crocodilians have evolved a bony secondary palate that allows them to continue breathing while remaining submerged (and protect their brains against damage by struggling prey). Skinks (family Scincidae) also have evolved a bony secondary palate, to varying degrees. Snakes took a different approach and extended their trachea instead. Their tracheal extension sticks out like a fleshy straw, and allows these animals to swallow large prey without suffering from asphyxiation.[87]
Turtles and tortoises
Red-eared slider taking a gulp of air
How turtles and tortoises breathe has been the subject of much study. To date, only a few species have been studied thoroughly enough to get an idea of how those turtles breathe. The varied results indicate that turtles and tortoises have found a variety of solutions to this problem.
The difficulty is that most turtle shells are rigid and do not allow for the type of expansion and contraction that other amniotes use to ventilate their lungs. Some turtles, such as the Indian flapshell (Lissemys punctata), have a sheet of muscle that envelops the lungs. When it contracts, the turtle can exhale. When at rest, the turtle can retract the limbs into the body cavity and force air out of the lungs. When the turtle protracts its limbs, the pressure inside the lungs is reduced, and the turtle can suck air in. Turtle lungs are attached to the inside of the top of the shell (carapace), with the bottom of the lungs attached (via connective tissue) to the rest of the viscera. By using a series of special muscles (roughly equivalent to a diaphragm), turtles are capable of pushing their viscera up and down, resulting in effective respiration, since many of these muscles have attachment points in conjunction with their forelimbs (indeed, many of the muscles expand into the limb pockets during contraction).[88]
Breathing during locomotion has been studied in three species, and they show different patterns. Adult female green sea turtles do not breathe as they crutch along their nesting beaches. They hold their breath during terrestrial locomotion and breathe in bouts as they rest. North American box turtles breathe continuously during locomotion, and the ventilation cycle is not coordinated with the limb movements.[89] This is because they use their abdominal muscles to breathe during locomotion. The last species to have been studied is the red-eared slider, which also breathes during locomotion, but takes smaller breaths during locomotion than during small pauses between locomotor bouts, indicating that there may be mechanical interference between the limb movements and the breathing apparatus. Box turtles have also been observed to breathe while completely sealed up inside their shells.[89]
Sound production
Compared to frogs, birds and mammals, reptiles are less vocal. Sound production is usually limited to hissing, which is produced merely by forcing air though a partly closed glottis and is not considered to be a true vocalization. The ability to vocalize exists in crocodilians, and some lizards and turtles; and typically involves vibrating fold-like structures in the larynx or glottis. Some geckos and turtles possess true vocal cords, which have elastin-rich connective tissue.[90][91]
Skin
Skin of a sand lizard, showing squamate reptiles iconic scales
Reptilian skin is covered in a horny epidermis, making it watertight and enabling reptiles to live on dry land, in contrast to amphibians. Compared to mammalian skin, that of reptiles is rather thin and lacks the thick dermal layer that produces leather in mammals.[92] Exposed parts of reptiles are protected by scales or scutes, sometimes with a bony base (osteoderms), forming armor. In lepidosaurians, such as lizards and snakes, the whole skin is covered in overlapping epidermal scales. Such scales were once thought to be typical of the class Reptilia as a whole, but are now known to occur only in lepidosaurians.[citation needed] The scales found in turtles and crocodiles are of dermal, rather than epidermal, origin and are properly termed scutes.[citation needed] In turtles, the body is hidden inside a hard shell composed of fused scutes.
Lacking a thick dermis, reptilian leather is not as strong as mammalian leather. It is used in leather-wares for decorative purposes for shoes, belts and handbags, particularly crocodile skin.
Shedding
Reptiles shed their skin through a process called ecdysis which occurs continuously throughout their lifetime. In particular, younger reptiles tend to shed once every 5–6 weeks while adults shed 3–4 times a year.[93] Younger reptiles shed more because of their rapid growth rate. Once full size, the frequency of shedding drastically decreases. The process of ecdysis involves forming a new layer of skin under the old one. Proteolytic enzymes and lymphatic fluid is secreted between the old and new layers of skin. Consequently, this lifts the old skin from the new one allowing shedding to occur.[94] Snakes will shed from the head to the tail while lizards shed in a "patchy pattern".[94] Dysecdysis, a common skin disease in snakes and lizards, will occur when ecdysis, or shedding, fails.[95] There are numerous reasons why shedding fails and can be related to inadequate humidity and temperature, nutritional deficiencies, dehydration and traumatic injuries.[94] Nutritional deficiencies decrease proteolytic enzymes while dehydration reduces lymphatic fluids to separate the skin layers. Traumatic injuries on the other hand, form scars that will not allow new scales to form and disrupt the process of ecdysis.[95]
Excretion
Excretion is performed mainly by two small kidneys. In diapsids, uric acid is the main nitrogenous waste product; turtles, like mammals, excrete mainly urea. Unlike the kidneys of mammals and birds, reptile kidneys are unable to produce liquid urine more concentrated than their body fluid. This is because they lack a specialized structure called a loop of Henle, which is present in the nephrons of birds and mammals. Because of this, many reptiles use the colon to aid in the reabsorption of water. Some are also able to take up water stored in the bladder. Excess salts are also excreted by nasal and lingual salt glands in some reptiles.
In all reptiles the urinogenital ducts and the anus both empty into an organ called a cloaca. In some reptiles, a midventral wall in the cloaca may open into a urinary bladder, but not all. It is present in all turtles and tortoises as well as most lizards, but is lacking in the monitor lizard, the legless lizards. It is absent in the snakes, alligators, and crocodiles.[96]
Many turtles, tortoises, and lizards have proportionally very large bladders. Charles Darwin noted that the Galapagos tortoise had a bladder which could store up to 20% of its body weight.[97] Such adaptations are the result of environments such as remote islands and deserts where water is very scarce.[98]: 143 Other desert-dwelling reptiles have large bladders that can store a long-term reservoir of water for up to several months and aid in osmoregulation.[99]
Turtles have two or more accessory urinary bladders, located lateral to the neck of the urinary bladder and dorsal to the pubis, occupying a significant portion of their body cavity.[100] Their bladder is also usually bilobed with a left and right section. The right section is located under the liver, which prevents large stones from remaining in that side while the left section is more likely to have calculi.[101]
Digestion
A colubrid snake, Dolichophis jugularis, eating a legless lizard, Pseudopus apodus. Most reptiles are carnivorous, and many primarily eat other reptiles and small mammals.
Gastroliths from a plesiosaur
Most reptiles are insectivorous or carnivorous and have simple and comparatively short digestive tracts due to meat being fairly simple to break down and digest. Digestion is slower than in mammals, reflecting their lower resting metabolism and their inability to divide and masticate their food.[102] Their poikilotherm metabolism has very low energy requirements, allowing large reptiles like crocodiles and large constrictors to live from a single large meal for months, digesting it slowly.[77]
While modern reptiles are predominantly carnivorous, during the early history of reptiles several groups produced some herbivorous megafauna: in the Paleozoic, the pareiasaurs; and in the Mesozoic several lines of dinosaurs.[42] Today, turtles are the only predominantly herbivorous reptile group, but several lines of agamas and iguanas have evolved to live wholly or partly on plants.[103]
Herbivorous reptiles face the same problems of mastication as herbivorous mammals but, lacking the complex teeth of mammals, many species swallow rocks and pebbles (so called gastroliths) to aid in digestion: The rocks are washed around in the stomach, helping to grind up plant matter.[103] Fossil gastroliths have been found associated with both ornithopods and sauropods, though whether they actually functioned as a gastric mill in the latter is disputed.[104][105] Salt water crocodiles also use gastroliths as ballast, stabilizing them in the water or helping them to dive.[106] A dual function as both stabilizing ballast and digestion aid has been suggested for gastroliths found in plesiosaurs.[107]
Nerves
The reptilian nervous system contains the same basic part of the amphibian brain, but the reptile cerebrum and cerebellum are slightly larger. Most typical sense organs are well developed with certain exceptions, most notably the snake's lack of external ears (middle and inner ears are present). There are twelve pairs of cranial nerves.[108] Due to their short cochlea, reptiles use electrical tuning to expand their range of audible frequencies.
Intelligence
See also: Animal cognition
Reptiles are generally considered less intelligent than mammals and birds.[28] The size of their brain relative to their body is much less than that of mammals, the encephalization quotient being about one tenth of that of mammals,[109] though larger reptiles can show more complex brain development. Larger lizards, like the monitors, are known to exhibit complex behavior, including cooperation[110] and cognitive abilities allowing them to optimize their foraging and territoriality over time.[111] Crocodiles have relatively larger brains and show a fairly complex social structure. The Komodo dragon is even known to engage in play,[112] as are turtles, which are also considered to be social creatures,[113] and sometimes switch between monogamy and promiscuity in their sexual behavior.[citation needed] One study found that wood turtles were better than white rats at learning to navigate mazes.[114] Another study found that giant tortoises are capable of learning through operant conditioning, visual discrimination and retained learned behaviors with long-term memory.[115] Sea turtles have been regarded as having simple brains, but their flippers are used for a variety of foraging tasks (holding, bracing, corralling) in common with marine mammals.[116]
Vision
Most reptiles are diurnal animals. The vision is typically adapted to daylight conditions, with color vision and more advanced visual depth perception than in amphibians and most mammals.
Reptiles usually have excellent vision, allowing them to detect shapes and motions at long distances. They often have only a few Rod cells and have poor vision in low-light conditions. At the same time they have cells called "double cones" which give them sharp color vision and enable them to see ultraviolet wavelengths.[117] In some species, such as blind snakes, vision is reduced.
Many lepidosaurs have a photosensory organ on the top of their heads called the parietal eye, which are also called third eye, pineal eye or pineal gland. This "eye" does not work the same way as a normal eye does as it has only a rudimentary retina and lens and thus, cannot form images. It is however sensitive to changes in light and dark and can detect movement.[117]
Some snakes have extra sets of visual organs (in the loosest sense of the word) in the form of pits sensitive to infrared radiation (heat). Such heat-sensitive pits are particularly well developed in the pit vipers, but are also found in boas and pythons. These pits allow the snakes to sense the body heat of birds and mammals, enabling pit vipers to hunt rodents in the dark.[118]
Most reptiles including birds possess a nictitating membrane, a translucent third eyelid which is drawn over the eye from the inner corner. Notably, it protects a crocodilian's eyeball surface while allowing a degree of vision underwater.[119] However, many squamates, geckos and snakes in particular, lack eyelids, which are replaced by a transparent scale. This is called the brille, spectacle, or eyecap. The brille is usually not visible, except for when the snake molts, and it protects the eyes from dust and dirt.[120]
Reproduction
Crocodilian egg diagram
1. eggshell, 2. yolk sac, 3. yolk (nutrients), 4. vessels, 5. amnion, 6. chorion, 7. air space, 8. allantois, 9. albumin (egg white), 10. amniotic sac, 11. crocodile embryo, 12. amniotic fluid
Common House Geckos mating, ventral view with hemipenis inserted in the cloaca
Most reptiles reproduce sexually, for example this Trachylepis maculilabris skink
Reptiles have amniotic eggs with hard or leathery shells, requiring internal fertilization when mating.
Reptiles generally reproduce sexually,[121] though some are capable of asexual reproduction. All reproductive activity occurs through the cloaca, the single exit/entrance at the base of the tail where waste is also eliminated. Most reptiles have copulatory organs, which are usually retracted or inverted and stored inside the body. In turtles and crocodilians, the male has a single median penis, while squamates, including snakes and lizards, possess a pair of hemipenes, only one of which is typically used in each session. Tuatara, however, lack copulatory organs, and so the male and female simply press their cloacas together as the male discharges sperm.[122]
Most reptiles lay amniotic eggs covered with leathery or calcareous shells. An amnion, chorion, and allantois are present during embryonic life. The eggshell (1) protects the crocodile embryo (11) and keeps it from drying out, but it is flexible to allow gas exchange. The chorion (6) aids in gas exchange between the inside and outside of the egg. It allows carbon dioxide to exit the egg and oxygen gas to enter the egg. The albumin (9) further protects the embryo and serves as a reservoir for water and protein. The allantois (8) is a sac that collects the metabolic waste produced by the embryo. The amniotic sac (10) contains amniotic fluid (12) which protects and cushions the embryo. The amnion (5) aids in osmoregulation and serves as a saltwater reservoir. The yolk sac (2) surrounding the yolk (3) contains protein and fat rich nutrients that are absorbed by the embryo via vessels (4) that allow the embryo to grow and metabolize. The air space (7) provides the embryo with oxygen while it is hatching. This ensures that the embryo will not suffocate while it is hatching. There are no larval stages of development. Viviparity and ovoviviparity have evolved in many extinct clades of reptiles and in squamates. In the latter group, many species, including all boas and most vipers, utilize this mode of reproduction. The degree of viviparity varies; some species simply retain the eggs until just before hatching, others provide maternal nourishment to supplement the yolk, and yet others lack any yolk and provide all nutrients via a structure similar to the mammalian placenta. The earliest documented case of viviparity in reptiles is the Early Permian mesosaurs,[123] although some individuals or taxa in that clade may also have been oviparous because a putative isolated egg has also been found. Several groups of Mesozoic marine reptiles also exhibited viviparity, such as mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs, and Sauropterygia, a group that include pachypleurosaurs and Plesiosauria.[3]
Asexual reproduction has been identified in squamates in six families of lizards and one snake. In some species of squamates, a population of females is able to produce a unisexual diploid clone of the mother. This form of asexual reproduction, called parthenogenesis, occurs in several species of gecko, and is particularly widespread in the teiids (especially Aspidocelis) and lacertids (Lacerta). In captivity, Komodo dragons (Varanidae) have reproduced by parthenogenesis.
Parthenogenetic species are suspected to occur among chameleons, agamids, xantusiids, and typhlopids.
Some reptiles exhibit temperature-dependent sex determination (TDSD), in which the incubation temperature determines whether a particular egg hatches as male or female. TDSD is most common in turtles and crocodiles, but also occurs in lizards and tuatara.[124] To date, there has been no confirmation of whether TDSD occurs in snakes.[125]
Defense mechanisms
Many small reptiles, such as snakes and lizards that live on the ground or in the water, are vulnerable to being preyed on by all kinds of carnivorous animals. Thus avoidance is the most common form of defense in reptiles.[126] At the first sign of danger, most snakes and lizards crawl away into the undergrowth, and turtles and crocodiles will plunge into water and sink out of sight.
Camouflage and warning
A camouflaged Phelsuma deubia on a palm frond
Reptiles tend to avoid confrontation through camouflage. Two major groups of reptile predators are birds and other reptiles, both of which have well developed color vision. Thus the skins of many reptiles have cryptic coloration of plain or mottled gray, green, and brown to allow them to blend into the background of their natural environment.[127] Aided by the reptiles' capacity for remaining motionless for long periods, the camouflage of many snakes is so effective that people or domestic animals are most typically bitten because they accidentally step on them.[128]
When camouflage fails to protect them, blue-tongued skinks will try to ward off attackers by displaying their blue tongues, and the frill-necked lizard will display its brightly colored frill. These same displays are used in territorial disputes and during courtship.[129] If danger arises so suddenly that flight is useless, crocodiles, turtles, some lizards, and some snakes hiss loudly when confronted by an enemy. Rattlesnakes rapidly vibrate the tip of the tail, which is composed of a series of nested, hollow beads to ward off approaching danger.
In contrast to the normal drab coloration of most reptiles, the lizards of the genus Heloderma (the Gila monster and the beaded lizard) and many of the coral snakes have high-contrast warning coloration, warning potential predators they are venomous.[130] A number of non-venomous North American snake species have colorful markings similar to those of the coral snake, an oft cited example of Batesian mimicry.[131][132]
Alternative defense in snakes
Further information: Venom and Evolution of snake venom
Camouflage does not always fool a predator. When caught out, snake species adopt different defensive tactics and use a complicated set of behaviors when attacked. Some first elevate their head and spread out the skin of their neck in an effort to look large and threatening. Failure of this strategy may lead to other measures practiced particularly by cobras, vipers, and closely related species, which use venom to attack. The venom is modified saliva, delivered through fangs from a venom gland.[133][134] Some non-venomous snakes, such as American hognose snakes or European grass snake, play dead when in danger; some, including the grass snake, exude a foul-smelling liquid to deter attackers.[135][136]
Defense in crocodilians
When a crocodilian is concerned about its safety, it will gape to expose the teeth and yellow tongue. If this doesn't work, the crocodilian gets a little more agitated and typically begins to make hissing sounds. After this, the crocodilian will start to change its posture dramatically to make itself look more intimidating. The body is inflated to increase apparent size. If absolutely necessary it may decide to attack an enemy.
A White-headed dwarf gecko with shed tail
Some species try to bite immediately. Some will use their heads as sledgehammers and literally smash an opponent, some will rush or swim toward the threat from a distance, even chasing the opponent onto land or galloping after it.[137] The main weapon in all crocodiles is the bite, which can generate very high bite force. Many species also possess canine-like teeth. These are used primarily for seizing prey, but are also used in fighting and display.[138]
Shedding and regenerating tails
Main article: Autotomy
Geckos, skinks, and other lizards that are captured by the tail will shed part of the tail structure through a process called autotomy and thus be able to flee. The detached tail will continue to wiggle, creating a deceptive sense of continued struggle and distracting the predator's attention from the fleeing prey animal. The detached tails of leopard geckos can wiggle for up to 20 minutes.[139] In many species the tails are of a separate and dramatically more intense color than the rest of the body so as to encourage potential predators to strike for the tail first. In the shingleback skink and some species of geckos, the tail is short and broad and resembles the head, so that the predators may attack it rather than the more vulnerable front part.[140]
Reptiles that are capable of shedding their tails can partially regenerate them over a period of weeks. The new section will however contain cartilage rather than bone, and will never grow to the same length as the original tail. It is often also distinctly discolored compared to the rest of the body and may lack some of the external sculpting features seen in the original tail.[141]
Relations with humans
Further information: Human uses of reptiles
In cultures and religions
Main article: Reptiles in culture
The 1897 painting of fighting "Laelaps" (now Dryptosaurus) by Charles R. Knight
Dinosaurs have been widely depicted in culture since the English palaeontologist Richard Owen coined the name dinosaur in 1842. As soon as 1854, the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs were on display to the public in south London.[142][143] One dinosaur appeared in literature even earlier, as Charles Dickens placed a Megalosaurus in the first chapter of his novel Bleak House in 1852.[144] The dinosaurs featured in books, films, television programs, artwork, and other media have been used for both education and entertainment. The depictions range from the realistic, as in the television documentaries of the 1990s and first decade of the 21st century, or the fantastic, as in the monster movies of the 1950s and 1960s.[143][145][146]
The snake or serpent has played a powerful symbolic role in different cultures. In Egyptian history, the Nile cobra adorned the crown of the pharaoh. It was worshipped as one of the gods and was also used for sinister purposes: murder of an adversary and ritual suicide (Cleopatra). In Greek mythology snakes are associated with deadly antagonists, as a chthonic symbol, roughly translated as earthbound. The nine-headed Lernaean Hydra that Hercules defeated and the three Gorgon sisters are children of Gaia, the earth. Medusa was one of the three Gorgon sisters who Perseus defeated. Medusa is described as a hideous mortal, with snakes instead of hair and the power to turn men to stone with her gaze. After killing her, Perseus gave her head to Athena who fixed it to her shield called the Aegis. The Titans are depicted in art with their legs replaced by bodies of snakes for the same reason: They are children of Gaia, so they are bound to the earth.[147] In Hinduism, snakes are worshipped as gods, with many women pouring milk on snake pits. The cobra is seen on the neck of Shiva, while Vishnu is depicted often as sleeping on a seven-headed snake or within the coils of a serpent. There are temples in India solely for cobras sometimes called Nagraj (King of Snakes), and it is believed that snakes are symbols of fertility. In the annual Hindu festival of Nag Panchami, snakes are venerated and prayed to.[148] In religious terms, the snake and jaguar are arguably the most important animals in ancient Mesoamerica. "In states of ecstasy, lords dance a serpent dance; great descending snakes adorn and support buildings from Chichen Itza to Tenochtitlan, and the Nahuatl word coatl meaning serpent or twin, forms part of primary deities such as Mixcoatl, Quetzalcoatl, and Coatlicue."[149] In Christianity and Judaism, a serpent appears in Genesis to tempt Adam and Eve with the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.[150]
The turtle has a prominent position as a symbol of steadfastness and tranquility in religion, mythology, and folklore from around the world.[151] A tortoise's longevity is suggested by its long lifespan and its shell, which was thought to protect it from any foe.[152] In the cosmological myths of several cultures a World Turtle carries the world upon its back or supports the heavens.[153]
Medicine
See also: Epidemiology of snakebites
The Rod of Asclepius symbolizes medicine
Deaths from snakebites are uncommon in many parts of the world, but are still counted in tens of thousands per year in India.[154] Snakebite can be treated with antivenom made from the venom of the snake. To produce antivenom, a mixture of the venoms of different species of snake is injected into the body of a horse in ever-increasing dosages until the horse is immunized. Blood is then extracted; the serum is separated, purified and freeze-dried.[155] The cytotoxic effect of snake venom is being researched as a potential treatment for cancers.[156]
Lizards such as the Gila monster produce toxins with medical applications. Gila toxin reduces plasma glucose; the substance is now synthesised for use in the anti-diabetes drug exenatide (Byetta).[157] Another toxin from Gila monster saliva has been studied for use as an anti-Alzheimer's drug.[158]
Geckos have also been used as medicine, especially in China.[159] Turtles have been used in Chinese traditional medicine for thousands of years, with every part of the turtle believed to have medical benefits. There is a lack of scientific evidence that would correlate claimed medical benefits to turtle consumption. Growing demand for turtle meat has placed pressure on vulnerable wild populations of turtles.[160]
Commercial farming
See also: Crocodile farm, Snake farm, and Turtle farming
Crocodiles are protected in many parts of the world, and are farmed commercially. Their hides are tanned and used to make leather goods such as shoes and handbags; crocodile meat is also considered a delicacy.[161] The most commonly farmed species are the saltwater and Nile crocodiles. Farming has resulted in an increase in the saltwater crocodile population in Australia, as eggs are usually harvested from the wild, so landowners have an incentive to conserve their habitat. Crocodile leather is made into wallets, briefcases, purses, handbags, belts, hats, and shoes. Crocodile oil has been used for various purposes.[162]
Snakes are also farmed, primarily in East and Southeast Asia, and their production has become more intensive in the last decade. Snake farming has been troubling for conservation in the past as it can lead to overexploitation of wild snakes and their natural prey to supply the farms. However, farming snakes can limit the hunting of wild snakes, while reducing the slaughter of higher-order vertebrates like cows. The energy efficiency of snakes is higher than expected for carnivores, due to their ectothermy and low metabolism. Waste protein from the poultry and pig industries is used as feed in snake farms.[163] Snake farms produce meat, snake skin, and antivenom.
Turtle farming is another known but controversial practice. Turtles have been farmed for a variety of reasons, ranging from food to traditional medicine, the pet trade, and scientific conservation. Demand for turtle meat and medicinal products is one of the main threats to turtle conservation in Asia. Though commercial breeding would seem to insulate wild populations, it can stoke the demand for them and increase wild captures.[164][160] Even the potentially appealing concept of raising turtles at a farm to release into the wild is questioned by some veterinarians who have had some experience with farm operations. They caution that this may introduce into the wild populations infectious diseases that occur on the farm, but have not (yet) been occurring in the wild.[165][166]
Reptiles in captivity
Further information: Herpetoculture
In the Western world, some snakes (especially docile species such as the ball python and corn snake) are kept as pets.[167] Numerous species of lizard are kept as pets, including bearded dragons,[168] iguanas, anoles,[169] and geckos (such as the popular leopard gecko and the crested gecko).[168]
Turtles and tortoises are an increasingly popular pet, but keeping them can be challenging due to particular requirements, such as temperature control and a varied diet, as well as the long lifespans of turtles, who can potentially outlive their owners. Good hygiene and significant maintenance is necessary when keeping reptiles, due to the risks of Salmonella and other pathogens.[170]
A herpetarium is a zoological exhibition space for reptiles or amphibians.
See also
List of reptiles
Lists of reptiles by region
Lizardicon.svg Reptiles portal
Further reading
Colbert, Edwin H. (1969). Evolution of the Vertebrates (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-16466-1.
Landberg, Tobias; Mailhot, Jeffrey; Brainerd, Elizabeth (2003). "Lung ventilation during treadmill locomotion in a terrestrial turtle, Terrapene carolina". Journal of Experimental Biology. 206 (19): 3391–3404. doi:10.1242/jeb.00553. PMID 12939371.
Pianka, Eric; Vitt, Laurie (2003). Lizards Windows to the Evolution of Diversity. University of California Press. pp. 116–118. ISBN 978-0-520-23401-7.
Pough, Harvey; Janis, Christine; Heiser, John (2005). Vertebrate Life. Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-145310-4.
Notes
This taxonomy does not reflect modern molecular evidence, which places turtles within Diapsida.
References
Gauthier J.A. (1994): The diversification of the amniotes. In: D.R. Prothero and R.M. Schoch (ed.) Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution: 129–159. Knoxville, Tennessee: The Paleontological Society.
Ezcurra, M. D.; Scheyer, T. M.; Butler, R. J. (2014). "The origin and early evolution of Sauria: reassessing the Permian saurian fossil record and the timing of the crocodile-lizard divergence". PLOS ONE. 9 (2): e89165. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...989165E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089165. PMC 3937355. PMID 24586565.
Sander, P. Martin (2012). "Reproduction in early amniotes". Science. 337 (6096): 806–808. Bibcode:2012Sci...337..806S. doi:10.1126/science.1224301. PMID 22904001. S2CID 7041966.
Franklin-Brown, Mary (2012). Reading the world : encyclopedic writing in the scholastic age. Chicago London: The University of Chicago Press. p. 223;377. ISBN 9780226260709.
Linnaeus, Carolus (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae :secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin) (10th ed.). Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii). Retrieved September 22, 2008.
"Amphibia". Encyclopædia Britannica (9th ed.). 1878.
Laurenti, J.N. (1768): Specimen Medicum, Exhibens Synopsin Reptilium Emendatam cum Experimentis circa Venena. Facsimile, showing the mixed composition of his Reptilia
Latreielle, P.A. (1804): Nouveau Dictionnaire à Histoire Naturelle, xxiv., cited in Latreille's Familles naturelles du règne animal, exposés succinctement et dans un ordre analytique, 1825
Huxley, T.H. (1863): The Structure and Classification of the Mammalia. Hunterian lectures, presented in Medical Times and Gazette, 1863. original text
Goodrich, E.S. (1916). "On the classification of the Reptilia". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 89 (615): 261–276. Bibcode:1916RSPSB..89..261G. doi:10.1098/rspb.1916.0012.
Watson, D.M.S. (1957). "On Millerosaurus and the early history of the sauropsid reptiles". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 240 (673): 325–400. Bibcode:1957RSPTB.240..325W. doi:10.1098/rstb.1957.0003.
Lydekker, Richard (1896). The Royal Natural History: Reptiles and Fishes. London: Frederick Warne & Son. pp. 2–3. Retrieved March 25, 2016. "Lydekker Royal Natural History Reptilia."
Tudge, Colin (2000). The Variety of Life. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198604262.
Osborn, H.F. (1903). "The Reptilian subclasses Diapsida and Synapsida and Early History of Diaptosauria". Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History. 1: 451–507.
Romer, A.S. (1933). Vertebrate Paleontology. University of Chicago Press., 3rd ed., 1966.
Tsuji, L.A.; Müller, J. (2009). "Assembling the history of the Parareptilia: phylogeny, diversification, and a new definition of the clade". Fossil Record. 12 (1): 71–81. doi:10.1002/mmng.200800011.
Brysse, K. (2008). "From weird wonders to stem lineages: the second reclassification of the Burgess Shale fauna". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 39 (3): 298–313. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.06.004. PMID 18761282.
Modesto, S.P.; Anderson, J.S. (2004). "The phylogenetic definition of Reptilia". Systematic Biology. 53 (5): 815–821. doi:10.1080/10635150490503026. PMID 15545258.
Benton, Michael J. (2005). Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8.
Benton, Michael J. (2014). Vertebrate Palaeontology (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8.
Lee, M.S.Y. (2013). "Turtle origins: Insights from phylogenetic retrofitting and molecular scaffolds". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (12): 2729–2738. doi:10.1111/jeb.12268. PMID 24256520.
Hideyuki Mannena & Steven S.-L. Li (1999). "Molecular evidence for a clade of turtles". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 13 (1): 144–148. doi:10.1006/mpev.1999.0640. PMID 10508547.
Zardoya, R.; Meyer, A. (1998). "Complete mitochondrial genome suggests diapsid affinities of turtles". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 95 (24): 14226–14231. Bibcode:1998PNAS...9514226Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.24.14226. PMC 24355. PMID 9826682.
Iwabe, N.; Hara, Y.; Kumazawa, Y.; Shibamoto, K.; Saito, Y.; Miyata, T.; Katoh, K. (2004-12-29). "Sister group relationship of turtles to the bird-crocodilian clade revealed by nuclear DNA-coded proteins". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 22 (4): 810–813. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi075. PMID 15625185.
Roos, Jonas; Aggarwal, Ramesh K.; Janke, Axel (Nov 2007). "Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses yield new insight into crocodylian evolution and their survival of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 45 (2): 663–673. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.018. PMID 17719245.
Katsu, Y.; Braun, E.L.; Guillette, L.J. Jr.; Iguchi, T. (2010-03-17). "From reptilian phylogenomics to reptilian genomes: analyses of c-Jun and DJ-1 proto-oncogenes". Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 127 (2–4): 79–93. doi:10.1159/000297715. PMID 20234127. S2CID 12116018.
Tyler R. Lyson, Erik A. Sperling, Alysha M. Heimberg, Jacques A. Gauthier, Benjamin L. King & Kevin J. Peterson (2012). "MicroRNAs support a turtle + lizard clade". Biology Letters. 8 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0477. PMC 3259949. PMID 21775315.
Romer, A.S. & T.S. Parsons. 1977. The Vertebrate Body. 5th ed. Saunders, Philadelphia. (6th ed. 1985)
Gilbert, SF; Corfe, I (May 2013). "Turtle origins: picking up speed" (PDF). Dev. Cell. 25 (4): 326–328. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.011. PMID 23725759.
Chiari, Ylenia; Cahais, Vincent; Galtier, Nicolas; Delsuc, Frédéric (2012). "Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria)". BMC Biology. 10 (65): 65. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-65. PMC 3473239. PMID 22839781.
Werneburg, Ingmar; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo (2009). "Timing of organogenesis support basal position of turtles in the amniote tree of life". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 9, 82: 82. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-82. PMC 2679012. PMID 19389226.
Laurin, M.; Reisz, R. R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny" (PDF). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x.
Paton, R.L.; Smithson, T.R.; Clack, J.A. (1999). "An amniote-like skeleton from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland". Nature. 398 (6727): 508–513. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..508P. doi:10.1038/19071. S2CID 204992355.
Monastersky, R (1999). "Out of the Swamps, How early vertebrates established a foothold – with all 10 toes – on land". Science News. 155 (21): 328–330. doi:10.2307/4011517. JSTOR 4011517. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011.
Chapter 6: "Walking with early tetrapods: evolution of the postcranial skeleton and the phylogenetic affinities of the Temnospondyli (Vertebrata: Tetrapoda)." In: Kat Pawley (2006). "The postcranial skeleton of temnospondyls (Tetrapoda: temnospondyli)." PhD Thesis. La Trobe University, Melbourne. hdl:1959.9/57256
Falcon-Lang, H.J.; Benton, M.J.; Stimson, M. (2007). "Ecology of early reptiles inferred from Lower Pennsylvanian trackways". Journal of the Geological Society. 164 (6): 1113–1118. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1002.5009. doi:10.1144/0016-76492007-015. S2CID 140568921.
"Earliest Evidence For Reptiles". Sflorg.com. 2007-10-17. Archived from the original on July 16, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
Palmer, D., ed. (1999). The Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals. London: Marshall Editions. p. 62. ISBN 978-1-84028-152-1.
Ruta, M.; Coates, M.I.; Quicke, D.L.J. (2003). "Early tetrapod relationships revisited" (PDF). Biological Reviews. 78 (2): 251–345. doi:10.1017/S1464793102006103. PMID 12803423. S2CID 31298396.
Brocklehurst, Neil (July 31, 2021). "The First Age of Reptiles? Comparing Reptile and Synapsid Diversity, and the Influence of Lagerstätten, During the Carboniferous and Early Permian". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.669765.
Sahney, S., Benton, M.J. & Falcon-Lang, H.J. (2010). "Rainforest collapse triggered Pennsylvanian tetrapod diversification in Euramerica". Geology. 38 (12): 1079–1082. Bibcode:2010Geo....38.1079S. doi:10.1130/G31182.1.
Sahney, S., Benton, M.J. and Ferry, P.A. (2010). "Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land". Biology Letters. 6 (4): 544–547. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1024. PMC 2936204. PMID 20106856.
Coven, R (2000): History of Life. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK. p 154 from Google Books
Juan C. Cisneros, Ross Damiani, Cesar Schultz, Átila da Rosa, Cibele Schwanke, Leopoldo W. Neto and Pedro L.P. Aurélio (2004). "A procolophonoid reptile with temporal fenestration from the Middle Triassic of Brazil". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 271 (1547): 1541–1546. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2748. PMC 1691751. PMID 15306328.
Linda A. Tsuji & Johannes Müller (2009). "Assembling the history of the Parareptilia: phylogeny, diversification, and a new definition of the clade". Fossil Record. 12 (1): 71–81. doi:10.1002/mmng.200800011.
Graciela Piñeiro, Jorge Ferigolo, Alejandro Ramos and Michel Laurin (2012). "Cranial morphology of the Early Permian mesosaurid Mesosaurus tenuidens and the evolution of the lower temporal fenestration reassessed". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 11 (5): 379–391. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2012.02.001.
van Tuninen, M.; Hadly, E.A. (2004). "Error in Estimation of Rate and Time Inferred from the Early Amniote Fossil Record and Avian Molecular Clocks". Journal of Molecular Biology. 59 (2): 267–276. Bibcode:2004JMolE..59..267V. doi:10.1007/s00239-004-2624-9. PMID 15486700. S2CID 25065918.
Benton, M.J. (2000). Vertebrate Paleontology (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell Science Ltd. ISBN 978-0-632-05614-9., 3rd ed. 2004 ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8
Rieppel O, DeBraga M (1996). "Turtles as diapsid reptiles". Nature. 384 (6608): 453–455. Bibcode:1996Natur.384..453R. doi:10.1038/384453a0. S2CID 4264378.
Colbert, E.H. & Morales, M. (2001): Colbert's Evolution of the Vertebrates: A History of the Backboned Animals Through Time. 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York. ISBN 978-0-471-38461-8.
Sahney, S. & Benton, M.J. (2008). "Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275 (1636): 759–765. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1370. PMC 2596898. PMID 18198148.
Lee, Michael SY; Cau, Andrea; Darren, Naish; Gareth J., Dyke (2013). "Morphological Clocks in Paleontology, and a Mid-Cretaceous Origin of Crown Aves". Systematic Biology. 63 (3): 442–449. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt110. PMID 24449041.
John W. Merck (1997). "A phylogenetic analysis of the euryapsid reptiles". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 17 (Supplement to 3): 1–93. doi:10.1080/02724634.1997.10011028.
Sean Modesto; Robert Reisz; Diane Scott (2011). "A neodiapsid reptile from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma". Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts: 160.
"GEOL 331 Vertebrate Paleontology II: Fossil Tetrapods". www.geol.umd.edu.
Ryosuke Motani; Nachio Minoura; Tatsuro Ando (1998). "Ichthyosaurian relationships illuminated by new primitive skeletons from Japan". Nature. 393 (6682): 255–257. Bibcode:1998Natur.393..255M. doi:10.1038/30473. S2CID 4416186.
Molnar, Ralph E. (2004). Dragons in the dust: the paleobiology of the giant monitor lizard Megalania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-34374-1.
Evans, Susan E.; Klembara, Jozef (2005). "A choristoderan reptile (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Lower Miocene of northwest Bohemia (Czech Republic)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 25 (1): 171–184. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0171:ACRRDF]2.0.CO;2.
Hansen, D.M.; Donlan, C.J.; Griffiths, C.J.; Campbell, K.J. (April 2010). "Ecological history and latent conservation potential: large and giant tortoises as a model for taxon substitutions". Ecography. 33 (2): 272–284. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06305.x.
Cione, A.L.; Tonni, E.P.; Soibelzon, L. (2003). "The Broken Zig-Zag: Late Cenozoic large mammal and tortoise extinction in South America". Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat. N.S. 5 (1): 1–19. doi:10.22179/REVMACN.5.26.
Longrich, Nicholas R.; Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S.; Gauthier, Jacques A. (2012). "Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (52): 21396–21401. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10921396L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1211526110. PMC 3535637. PMID 23236177.
"The Reptile Database". Retrieved February 23, 2016.
Tod W. Reeder, Ted M. Townsend, Daniel G. Mulcahy, Brice P. Noonan, Perry L. Wood Jr., Jack W. Sites Jr. & John J. Wiens (2015). "Integrated analyses resolve conflicts over squamate reptile phylogeny and reveal unexpected placements for fossil taxa". PLOS One. 10 (3): e0118199. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1018199R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118199. PMC 4372529. PMID 25803280.
"Numbers of threatened species by major groups of organisms (1996–2012)" (PDF). IUCN Red List, 2010. IUCN. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 4, 2013. Retrieved January 30, 2013.
Pincheira-Donoso, Daniel; Bauer, Aaron M.; Meiri, Shai; Uetz, Peter (2013-03-27). "Global Taxonomic Diversity of Living Reptiles". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e59741. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...859741P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059741. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3609858. PMID 23544091.
Hicks, James (2002). "The Physiological and Evolutionary Significance of Cardiovascular Shunting Patterns in Reptiles". News in Physiological Sciences. 17 (6): 241–245. doi:10.1152/nips.01397.2002. PMID 12433978. S2CID 20040550.
DABVP, Ryan S. De Voe DVM MSpVM DACZM. "Reptilian cardiovascular anatomy and physiology: evaluation and monitoring (Proceedings)". dvm360.com. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
"Iguana Internal Body Parts". Reptile & Parrots Forum. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
Wang, Tobias; Altimiras, Jordi; Klein, Wilfried; Axelsson, Michael (2003). "Ventricular haemodynamics in Python molurus: separation of pulmonary and systemic pressures". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 206 (Pt 23): 4242–4245. doi:10.1242/jeb.00681. PMID 14581594.
Axelsson, Michael; Craig E. Franklin (1997). "From anatomy to angioscopy: 164 years of crocodilian cardiovascular research, recent advances, and speculations". Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A. 188 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1016/S0300-9629(96)00255-1.
Huey, R.B. & Bennett, A.F. (1987):Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation: Preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperatures of lizards. Evolution No. 4, vol 5: pp. 1098–1115 PDF
Huey, R.B. (1982): Temperature, physiology, and the ecology of reptiles. Side 25–91. In Gans, C. & Pough, F.H. (red), Biology of the Reptili No. 12, Physiology (C). Academic Press, London.artikkel
Spotila J.R. & Standora, E.A. (1985) Environmental constraints on the thermal energetics of sea turtles. 'Copeia 3: 694–702
Paladino, F.V.; Spotila, J.R & Dodson, P. (1999): A blueprint for giants: modeling the physiology of large dinosaurs. The Complete Dinosaur. Bloomington, Indiana University Press. pp. 491–504. ISBN 978-0-253-21313-6.
Spotila, J.R.; O'Connor, M.P.; Dodson, P.; Paladino, F.V. (1991). "Hot and cold running dinosaurs: body size, metabolism and migration". Modern Geology. 16: 203–227.
Campbell, N.A. & Reece, J.B. (2006): Outlines & Highlights for Essential Biology. Academic Internet Publishers. 396 pp. ISBN 978-0-8053-7473-5
Garnett, S. T. (2009). "Metabolism and survival of fasting Estuarine crocodiles". Journal of Zoology. 4 (208): 493–502. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1986.tb01518.x.
Willmer, P., Stone, G. & Johnston, I.A. (2000): Environmental physiology of animals. Blackwell Science Ltd, London. 644 pp. ISBN 978-0-632-03517-5
Bennett, A.; Ruben, J. (1979). "Endothermy and Activity in Vertebrates" (PDF). Science. 206 (4419): 649–654. Bibcode:1979Sci...206..649B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.551.4016. doi:10.1126/science.493968. PMID 493968.
Farmer, C.G. (2000). "Parental Care: The Key to Understanding Endothermy and Other Convergent Features in Birds and Mammals". American Naturalist. 155 (3): 326–334. doi:10.1086/303323. PMID 10718729. S2CID 17932602.
Hicks, J; Farmer, CG (1999). "Gas Exchange Potential in Reptilian Lungs: Implications for the Dinosaur-Avian Connection". Respiratory Physiology. 117 (2–3): 73–83. doi:10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00060-2. PMID 10563436.
Orenstein, Ronald (2001). Turtles, Tortoises & Terrapins: Survivors in Armor. Firefly Books. ISBN 978-1-55209-605-5.
Klein, Wilfied; Abe, Augusto; Andrade, Denis; Perry, Steven (2003). "Structure of the posthepatic septum and its influence on visceral topology in the tegu lizard, Tupinambis merianae (Teidae: Reptilia)". Journal of Morphology. 258 (2): 151–157. doi:10.1002/jmor.10136. PMID 14518009. S2CID 9901649.
Farmer, CG; Sanders, K (2010). "Unidirectional airflow in the lungs of alligators". Science. 327 (5963): 338–340. Bibcode:2010Sci...327..338F. doi:10.1126/science.1180219. PMID 20075253. S2CID 206522844.
Schachner, E.R.; Cieri, R.L.; Butler, J.P.; Farmer, C.G. (2013). "Unidirectional pulmonary airflow patterns in the savannah monitor lizard". Nature. 506 (7488): 367–370. Bibcode:2014Natur.506..367S. doi:10.1038/nature12871. PMID 24336209. S2CID 4456381.
Robert L. Cieri, Brent A. Craven, Emma R. Schachner & C.G. Farmer (2014). "New insight into the evolution of the vertebrate respiratory system and the discovery of unidirectional airflow in iguana lungs". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (48): 17218–17223. Bibcode:2014PNAS..11117218C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1405088111. PMC 4260542. PMID 25404314.open access
Chiodini, Rodrick J.; Sundberg, John P.; Czikowsky, Joyce A. (January 1982). Timmins, Patricia (ed.). "Gross anatomy of snakes". Veterinary Medicine/Small Animal Clinician – via ResearchGate.
Lyson, Tyler R.; Schachner, Emma R.; Botha-Brink, Jennifer; Scheyer, Torsten M.; Lambertz, Markus; Bever, G.S.; Rubidge, Bruce S.; de Queiroz, Kevin (2014). "Origin of the unique ventilatory apparatus of turtles" (PDF). Nature Communications. 5 (5211): 5211. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.5211L. doi:10.1038/ncomms6211. PMID 25376734.open access
Landberg, Tobias; Mailhot, Jeffrey; Brainerd, Elizabeth (2003). "Lung ventilation during treadmill locomotion in a terrestrial turtle, Terrapene carolina". Journal of Experimental Biology. 206 (19): 3391–3404. doi:10.1242/jeb.00553. PMID 12939371.
Russell, Anthony P.; Bauer, Aaron M. (2020). "Vocalization by extant nonavian reptiles: A synthetic overview of phonation and the vocal apparatus". The Anatomical Record Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology. 304 (7): 1478–1528. doi:10.1002/ar.24553. PMID 33099849. S2CID 225069598.
Capshaw, Grace; Willis, Katie L.; Han, Dawei; Bierman, Hilary S. (2020). "Reptile sound production and perception". In Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.; Hoffmann, Frauke (ed.). Neuroendocrine Regulation of Animal Vocalization. Academic Press. pp. 101–118. ISBN 978-0128151600.
Hildebran, M. & Goslow, G. (2001): Analysis of Vertebrate Structure. 5th edition. John Wiley & sons inc, New York. 635 pp. ISBN 978-0-471-29505-1
Paterson, Sue (December 17, 2007). Skin Diseases of Exotic Pets. Blackwell Science, Ltd. pp. 74–79. ISBN 9780470752432.
Hellebuyck, Tom; Pasmans, Frank; Haesbrouck, Freddy; Martel, An (July 2012). "Dermatological Diseases in Lizards". The Veterinary Journal. 193 (1): 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.02.001. PMID 22417690.
Girling, Simon (June 26, 2013). Veterinary Nursing of Exotic Pets (2 ed.). Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 9781118782941.
Herbert W. Rand (1950). The Chordates. Balkiston.
P.J. Bentley (14 March 2013). Endocrines and Osmoregulation: A Comparative Account in Vertebrates. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-662-05014-9.
Paré, Jean (January 11, 2006). "Reptile Basics: Clinical Anatomy 101" (PDF). Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference. 20: 1657–1660.
Davis, Jon R.; DeNardo, Dale F. (2007-04-15). "The urinary bladder as a physiological reservoir that moderates dehydration in a large desert lizard, the Gila monster Heloderma suspectum". Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (8): 1472–1480. doi:10.1242/jeb.003061. ISSN 0022-0949. PMID 17401130.
Wyneken, Jeanette; Witherington, Dawn (February 2015). "Urogenital System" (PDF). Anatomy of Sea Turtles. 1: 153–165.
Divers, Stephen J.; Mader, Douglas R. (2005). Reptile Medicine and Surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 481, 597. ISBN 9781416064770.
Karasov, W.H. (1986). "Nutrient requirement and the design and function of guts in fish, reptiles and mammals". In Dejours, P.; Bolis, L.; Taylor, C.R.; Weibel, E.R. (eds.). Comparative Physiology: Life in Water and on Land. Liviana Press/Springer Verlag. pp. 181–191. ISBN 978-0-387-96515-4. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
King, Gillian (1996). Reptiles and herbivory (1 ed.). London: Chapman & Hall. ISBN 978-0-412-46110-1.
Cerda, Ignacio A. (1 June 2008). "Gastroliths in An Ornithopod Dinosaur". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 53 (2): 351–355. doi:10.4202/app.2008.0213.
Wings, O.; Sander, P.M. (7 March 2007). "No gastric mill in sauropod dinosaurs: new evidence from analysis of gastrolith mass and function in ostriches". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1610): 635–640. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3763. PMC 2197205. PMID 17254987.open access
Henderson, Donald M (1 August 2003). "Effects of stomach stones on the buoyancy and equilibrium of a floating crocodilian: a computational analysis". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 81 (8): 1346–1357. doi:10.1139/z03-122.
McHenry, C.R. (7 October 2005). "Bottom-Feeding Plesiosaurs". Science. 310 (5745): 75. doi:10.1126/science.1117241. PMID 16210529. S2CID 28832109.open access
"de beste bron van informatie over cultural institution. Deze website is te koop!". Curator.org. Archived from the original on September 17, 2009. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
Jerison, Harry J. "Figure of relative brain size in vertebrates". Brainmuseum.org. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
King, Dennis & Green, Brian. 1999. Goannas: The Biology of Varanid Lizards. University of New South Wales Press. ISBN 978-0-86840-456-1, p. 43.
"Latency in Problem Solving as Evidence for Learning in Varanid and Helodermatid Lizards, with Comments on Foraging Techniques". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2020-02-20.
Tim Halliday (Editor), Kraig Adler (Editor) (2002). Firefly Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. Hove: Firefly Books Ltd. pp. 112–113, 144, 147, 168–169. ISBN 978-1-55297-613-5.
"Even turtles need recess: Many animals – not just dogs, cats, and monkeys – need a little play time". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2020-02-20.
Angier, Natalie (December 16, 2006). "Ask Science". The New York Times. Retrieved September 15, 2013.
Gutnick, Tamar; Weissenbacher, Anton; Kuba, Michael J. (2020). "The underestimated giants: operant conditioning, visual discrimination and long-term memory in giant tortoises". Animal Cognition. 23 (1): 159–167. doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01326-6. ISSN 1435-9456. PMID 31720927. S2CID 207962281.
"Sea turtles use flippers to manipulate food". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2020-02-20.
Brames, Henry (2007). "Aspects of Light and Reptile Immunity". Iguana: Conservation, Natural History, and Husbandry of Reptiles. International Reptile Conservation Foundation. 14 (1): 19–23.
"Northern copperhead". Smithsonian's National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute. 25 April 2016. Retrieved 12 February 2020. "The copperhead is a pit viper and, like others pit vipers, it has heat-sensitive pit organs on each side of its head between the eye and the nostril. These pits detect objects that are warmer than the environment and enable copperheads to locate nocturnal, mammalian prey."
"Nictitating membrane | anatomy". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-02-20.
"Catalina Island Conservancy". www.catalinaconservancy.org. Retrieved 2020-02-20.
"Male reproductive behaviour of Naja oxiana (Eichwald, 1831) in captivity, with a case of unilateral hemipenile prolapse". Herpetology Notes. 2018 – via Biotaxa.
Lutz, Dick (2005), Tuatara: A Living Fossil, Salem, Oregon: DIMI Press, ISBN 978-0-931625-43-5
Piñeiro, G.; Ferigolo, J.; Meneghel, M.; Laurin, M. (2012). "The oldest known amniotic embryos suggest viviparity in mesosaurs". Historical Biology. 24 (6): 620–630. doi:10.1080/08912963.2012.662230. S2CID 59475679.
FireFly Encyclopedia Of Reptiles And Amphibians. Richmond Hill, Ontario: Firefly Books Ltd. 2008. pp. 117–118. ISBN 978-1-55407-366-5.
Chadwick, Derek; Goode, Jamie (2002). The genetics and biology of sex ... ISBN 978-0-470-84346-8. Retrieved March 16, 2010 – via Google Books.
"reptile (animal) :: Behaviour". Britannica.com. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
"Reptile and Amphibian Defense Systems". Teachervision.fen.com. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
Nagel, Salomé (2012). "Haemostatic function of dogs naturally envenomed by African puffadder (Bitis arietans) or snouted cobra (Naja annulifera)". MedVet Thesis at the University of Pretoria: 66. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
Cogger, Harold G. (1986). Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia. 2 Aquatic Drive Frenchs Forest NSW 2086: Reed Books PTY LTD. p. 238. ISBN 978-0-7301-0088-1.
North American wildlife. New York: Marshall Cavendish Reference. 2011. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-76147-938-3. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
Brodie III, Edmund D (1993). "Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging avian predators in Costa Rica". Evolution. 47 (1): 227–235. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01212.x. JSTOR 2410131. PMID 28568087. S2CID 7159917.
Brodie III, Edmund D., Moore, Allen J. (1995). "Experimental studies of coral snake mimicry: do snakes mimic millipedes?". Animal Behaviour. 49 (2): 534–536. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0072. S2CID 14576682.
(Edited by) Bauchot, Roland (1994). Snakes: A Natural History. Sterling Publishing. pp. 194–209. ISBN 978-1-4027-3181-5.
Casewell, N.R.; Wuster, W.; Vonk, F.J.; Harrison, R.A.; Fry, B.G. (2013). "Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 28 (4): 219–229. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.020. PMID 23219381.
Milius, Susan (October 28, 2006). "Why Play Dead?". Science News. 170 (18): 280–281. doi:10.2307/4017568. JSTOR 4017568. S2CID 85722243.
Cooke, Fred (2004). The Encyclopedia of Animals: A Complete Visual Guide. University of California Press. p. 405. ISBN 978-0-520-24406-1.
"Animal Planet :: Ferocious Crocs". Animal.discovery.com. 2008-09-10. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
Erickson, Gregory M.; Gignac, Paul M.; Steppan, Scott J.; Lappin, A. Kristopher; Vliet, Kent A.; Brueggen, John D.; Inouye, Brian D.; Kledzik, David; Webb, Grahame J.W.; Claessens, Leon (2012). "Insights into the Ecology and Evolutionary Success of Crocodilians Revealed through Bite-Force and Tooth-Pressure Experimentation". PLOS ONE. 7 (3): e31781. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...731781E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031781. PMC 3303775. PMID 22431965.open access
Marshall, Michael. "Zoologger: Gecko's amputated tail has life of its own". New Scientist Life. New Scientist. Retrieved August 18, 2014.
Pianka, Eric R.; Vitt, Laurie J. (2003). Lizards: Windows to the Evolution of Diversity (Organisms and Environments, 5). 5 (1 ed.). California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23401-7.
Alibardi, Lorenzo (2010). Morphological and cellular aspects of tail and limb regeneration in lizards a model system with implications for tissue regeneration in mammals. Advances in Anatomy, Embryology, and Cell Biology. 207. Heidelberg: Springer. pp. iii, v–x, 1–109. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03733-7_1. ISBN 978-3-642-03733-7. PMID 20334040.
Torrens, Hugh. "Politics and Paleontology". The Complete Dinosaur, 175–190.
Glut, Donald F.; Brett-Surman, Michael K. (1997). "Dinosaurs and the media". The Complete Dinosaur. Indiana University Press. pp. 675–706. ISBN 978-0-253-33349-0.
Dickens, Charles J.H. (1852). Bleak House, Chapter I: In Chancery . London: Bradbury & Evans. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-85326-082-7. "Michaelmas term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln's Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets, as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborne Hill"
Paul, Gregory S. (2000). "The Art of Charles R. Knight". In Paul, Gregory S. (ed.). The Scientific American Book of Dinosaurs. St. Martin's Press. pp. 113–118. ISBN 978-0-312-26226-6.
Searles, Baird (1988). "Dinosaurs and others". Films of Science Fiction and Fantasy. New York: AFI Press. pp. 104–116. ISBN 978-0-8109-0922-9.
Bullfinch, Thomas (2000). Bullfinch's Complete Mythology. London: Chancellor Press. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-7537-0381-6. Archived from the original on 2009-02-09.
Deane, John (1833). The Worship of the Serpent. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 61–64. ISBN 978-1-56459-898-1.
The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya. Miller, Mary 1993 Thames & Hudson. London ISBN 978-0-500-27928-1
Genesis 3:1
Plotkin, Pamela, T., 2007, Biology and Conservation of Ridley Sea Turtles, Johns Hopkins University, ISBN 0-8018-8611-2.
Ball, Catherine, 2004, Animal Motifs in Asian Art, Courier Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-43338-2.
Stookey, Lorena Laura, 2004, Thematic Guide to World Mythology, Greenwood Press, ISBN 978-0-313-31505-3.
Sinha, Kounteya (25 July 2006). "No more the land of snake charmers..." The Times of India.
Dubinsky, I (1996). "Rattlesnake bite in a patient with horse allergy and von Willebrand's disease: case report". Can Fam Physician. 42: 2207–2211. PMC 2146932. PMID 8939322.
Vivek Kumar Vyas, Keyur Brahmbahtt, Ustav Parmar; Brahmbhatt; Bhatt; Parmar (February 2012). "Theraputic potential of snake venom in cancer therapy: current perspective". Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 3 (2): 156–162. doi:10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60042-8. PMC 3627178. PMID 23593597.
Casey, Constance (26 April 2013). "Don't Call It a Monster". Slate.
"Alzheimer's research seeks out lizards". BBC. 5 April 2002.
Wagner, P.; Dittmann, A. (2014). "Medicinal use of Gekko gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae) has an impact on agamid lizards". Salamandra. 50 (3): 185–186.open access
"The threat of traditional medicine: China's boom may mean doom for turtles". Mongabay Environmental News. 2014-08-08. Retrieved 2020-01-16.
Lyman, Rick (November 30, 1998). "Anahuac Journal; Alligator Farmer Feeds Demand for All the Parts". The New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2013.
Janos, Elisabeth (2004). Country Folk Medicine: Tales of Skunk Oil, Sassafras Tea, and Other Old-time Remedies (1 ed.). Lyon's Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-59228-178-7.
Aust, Patrick W.; Tri, Ngo Van; Natusch, Daniel J. D.; Alexander, Graham J. (2017). "Asian snake farms: conservation curse or sustainable enterprise?". Oryx. 51 (3): 498–505. doi:10.1017/S003060531600034X. ISSN 0030-6053.
Haitao, Shi; Parham, James F.; Zhiyong, Fan; Meiling, Hong; Feng, Yin (2008). "Evidence for the massive scale of turtle farming in China". Oryx. 42 (1): 147–150. doi:10.1017/S0030605308000562. ISSN 1365-3008.
"GUEST EDITORIAL: MARINE TURTLE FARMING AND HEALTH ISSUES", Marine Turtle Newsletter, 72: 13–15, 1996
"This Turtle Tourist Center Also Raises Endangered Turtles for Meat". National Geographic News. 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2020-01-16.
Ernest, Carl; George R. Zug; Molly Dwyer Griffin (1996). Snakes in Question: The Smithsonian Answer Book. Smithsonian Books. p. 203. ISBN 978-1-56098-648-5.
Virata, John B. "5 Great Beginner Pet Lizards". Reptiles Magazine. Retrieved 28 May 2017.
McLeod, Lianne. "An Introduction to Green Anoles as Pets". The Spruce. Retrieved 28 May 2017.
"Turtles can make great pets, but do your homework first". phys.org. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
