Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Unikonta
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
Cladus: Sarcopterygii
Cladus: Rhipidistia
Cladus: Tetrapodomorpha
Cladus: Eotetrapodiformes
Cladus: Elpistostegalia
Superclassis: Tetrapoda
Cladus: Reptiliomorpha
Cladus: Amniota
Cladi: Reptilia – Synapsida
Name
Amniota Haeckel, 1866: XI, CXXXII
References
Primary references
Haeckel, E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenztheorie. Zweiter Band: Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen. clx + 462 pp., pls I–VIII. Berlin: Georg Reimer. BHL Reference page.
Vernacular names
беларуская: Амніёты
български: Амниота
català: Amniota
čeština: Amniota
Deutsch: Amnioten
English: Amniote
Esperanto: Amniulo
español: Amniota
suomi: Vesikalvolliset
français: Amniota
galego: Amniota
Gaelg: Amniota
עברית: בעלי שפיר עוברי
magyar: Magzatburkosok
italiano: Amnioti
日本語: 有羊膜類
ქართული: ამნიონიანები
lietuvių: Amniotai
Nederlands: Amniota
norsk: Amnioter
occitan: Amniota
polski: Owodniowce
português: Amniota
русский: Амниоты
Simple English: Amniote
српски / srpski: Амниоте
svenska: Amnioter
తెలుగు: ఉల్బధారులు
тоҷикӣ: Амниот
Türkçe: Amniyotik yumurtalılar
українська: Амніоти
Amniotes are a clade of tetrapod vertebrates that comprise sauropsids (including all reptiles and birds, and extinct parareptiles and dinosaurs) and synapsids (including pelycosaurs and therapsids such as mammals). They are distinguished by the development of three extraembryonic membranes (amnion for embryoic protection, chorion for gas exchange, and allantois for metabolic waste disposal or storage), thicker and more keratinized skin, and costal respiration (breathing by expanding/constricting the rib cage).[3][4][5][6]
All three main features listed above, namely the presence of amnions, water-impermeable cutes and a robust respiratory system, are very important for amniotes to live on land as true terrestrial animals — the ability to reproduce in locations away from water bodies, better homeostasis in drier environments, and more efficient air respiration to power terrestrial locomotions, although they might still require regular access to drinking water for rehydration like the semiaquatic amphibians do. Because the amnion shields the embryo from external chemical fluctuations, amniotes can reproduce on dry land by either laying shelled eggs (reptiles, birds and monotremes) or nurturing fertilized eggs within the mother (marsupial and placental mammals), unlike anamniotes (fish and amphibians) that have to spawn in or adjacent to aquatic environments. Additional unique features are the presence of adrenocortical and chromaffin tissues as a discrete pair of glands[7]: 600 near their kidneys, which are more complex,[7]: 552 the presence of an astragalus for better extremity range of motion,[8] and the complete loss of an aquatic metamorphic larval stage, gill and skin breathing, and any lateral line system.[7]: 694
The first amniotes, referred to as "basal amniotes", resembled small lizards and evolved from the amphibious reptiliomorphs about 312 million years ago,[9] in the Carboniferous geologic period. Amniotes spread around Earth's land and became the dominant land vertebrates.[9] They soon diverged into two clades, the synapsids and sauropsids, whose lineages both still persist today. The oldest known fossil synapsid is Protoclepsydrops from about 312 million years ago,[9] while the oldest known sauropsid are probably Hylonomus and Paleothyris, in the order Captorhinida, from the Middle Pennsylvanian epoch (c. 306–312 million years ago). Older sources, particularly before the 20th century, may refer to amniotes as "higher vertebrates" and anamniotes as "lower vertebrates", based on the antiquated idea of the evolutionary great chain of being.
Etymology
The term amniote comes from the amnion, which derives from Greek ἀμνίον (amnion), meaning "membrane surrounding the fetus". The term originally meant "bowl in which the blood of sacrificed animals was caught", which derived from ἀμνός (amnos), meaning "lamb".[10]
Description
Anatomy of an amniotic egg:
Eggshell
Outer membrane
Inner membrane
Chalaza
Exterior albumen (outer thin albumen)
Middle albumen (inner thick albumen)
Vitelline membrane
Nucleus of Pander
Germinal disk (blastoderm)
Yellow yolk
White yolk
Internal albumen
Chalaza
Air cell
Cuticula
Zoologists characterize amniotes in part by embryonic development that includes the formation of several extensive membranes, the amnion, chorion, and allantois. Amniotes develop directly into a (typically) terrestrial form with limbs and a thick stratified epithelium (rather than first entering a feeding larval tadpole stage followed by metamorphosis, as amphibians do). In amniotes, the transition from a two-layered periderm to a cornified epithelium is triggered by thyroid hormone during embryonic development, rather than by metamorphosis.[11] The unique embryonic features of amniotes may reflect specializations for eggs to survive drier environments; or the increase in size and yolk content of eggs may have permitted, and coevolved with, direct development of the embryo to a large size.
Adaptation for terrestrial living
Features of amniotes evolved for survival on land include a sturdy but porous leathery or hard eggshell and an allantois that facilitates respiration while providing a reservoir for disposal of wastes. Their kidneys (metanephros) and large intestines are also well-suited to water retention. Most mammals do not lay eggs, but corresponding structures develop inside the placenta.
The ancestors of true amniotes, such as Casineria kiddi, which lived about 340 million years ago, evolved from amphibian reptiliomorphs and resembled small lizards. At the late Devonian mass extinction (360 million years ago), all known tetrapods were essentially aquatic and fish-like. Because the reptiliomorphs were already established 20 million years later when all their fishlike relatives were extinct, it appears they separated from the other tetrapods somewhere during Romer's gap, when the adult tetrapods became fully terrestrial (some forms would later become secondarily aquatic).[12] The modest-sized ancestors of the amniotes laid their eggs in moist places, such as depressions under fallen logs or other suitable places in the Carboniferous swamps and forests; and dry conditions probably do not account for the emergence of the soft shell.[13] Indeed, many modern-day amniotes require moisture to keep their eggs from desiccating.[14] Although some modern amphibians lay eggs on land, all amphibians lack advanced traits like an amnion. The amniotic egg formed through a series of evolutionary steps. After internal fertilization and the habit of laying eggs in terrestrial environments became a reproduction strategy amongst the amniote ancestors, the next major breakthrough appears to have involved a gradual replacement of the gelatinous coating covering the amphibian egg with a fibrous shell membrane. This allowed the egg to increase both its size and in the rate of gas exchange, permitting a larger, metabolically more active embryo to reach full development before hatching. Further developments, like extraembryonic membranes (amnion, chorion, and allantois) and a calcified shell, were not essential and probably evolved later.[15] It has been suggested that shelled terrestrial eggs without extraembryonic membranes could still not have been more than about 1 cm (0.4 inch) in diameter because of diffusion problems, like the inability to get rid of carbon dioxide if the egg was larger. The combination of small eggs and the absence of a larval stage, where posthatching growth occurs in anamniotic tetrapods before turning into juveniles, would limit the size of the adults. This is supported by the fact that extant squamate species that lay eggs less than 1 cm in diameter have adults whose snout-vent length is less than 10 cm. The only way for the eggs to increase in size would be to develop new internal structures specialized for respiration and for waste products. As this happened, it would also affect how much the juveniles could grow before they reached adulthood.[16]
A similar pattern can be seen in modern amphibians. Frogs that have evolved terrestrial reproduction and direct development have both smaller adults and fewer and larger eggs compared to their relatives that still reproduce in water.[17]
The egg membranes
Fish and amphibian eggs have only one inner membrane, the embryonic membrane. Evolution of the amniote egg required increased exchange of gases and wastes between the embryo and the atmosphere. Structures to permit these traits allowed further adaption that increased the feasible size of amniote eggs and enabled breeding in progressively drier habitats. The increased size of eggs permitted increase in size of offspring and consequently of adults. Further growth for the latter, however, was limited by their position in the terrestrial food-chain, which was restricted to level three and below, with only invertebrates occupying level two. Amniotes would eventually experience adaptive radiations when some species evolved the ability to digest plants and new ecological niches opened up, permitting larger body-size for herbivores, omnivores and predators.[citation needed]
Amniote traits
While the early amniotes resembled their amphibian ancestors in many respects, a key difference was the lack of an otic notch at the back margin of the skull roof. In their ancestors, this notch held a spiracle, an unnecessary structure in an animal without an aquatic larval stage.[18] There are three main lines of amniotes, which may be distinguished by the structure of the skull and in particular the number of temporal fenestrae (openings) behind each eye. In anapsids, the ancestral condition, there are none, in synapsids (mammals and their extinct relatives) there is one, and most diapsids (including birds, crocodilians, squamates, and tuataras), have two. Turtles were traditionally classified as anapsids because they lack fenestrae, but molecular testing firmly places them in the diapsid line of descent - they therefore secondarily lost their fenestrae.
Post-cranial remains of amniotes can be identified from their Labyrinthodont ancestors by their having at least two pairs of sacral ribs, a sternum in the pectoral girdle (some amniotes have lost it) and an astragalus bone in the ankle.[19]
Definition and classification
Amniota was first formally described by the embryologist Ernst Haeckel in 1866 on the presence of the amnion, hence the name. A problem with this definition is that the trait (apomorphy) in question does not fossilize, and the status of fossil forms has to be inferred from other traits.
Amniotes
Archaeothyris, one of the most basal synapsids, first appears in the fossil records about 306 million years ago.[20]
By the Mesozoic, 150 million years ago, sauropsids included the largest animals anywhere. Shown are some late Jurassic dinosaurs, including the early bird Archaeopteryx perched on a tree stump.
Traditional classification
Classifications of the amniotes have traditionally recognised three classes based on major traits and physiology:[21][22][23][24]
Class Reptilia (reptiles)
Subclass Anapsida ("proto-reptiles", possibly including turtles)
Subclass Diapsida (majority of reptiles,[25] progenitors of birds)
Subclass Euryapsida (plesiosaurs, placodonts, and ichthyosaurs)
Subclass Synapsida (stem or proto-mammals, progenitors of mammals)
Class Aves (birds)
Subclass Archaeornithes (reptile-like birds, progenitors of all other birds)
Subclass Enantiornithes (early birds with an alternative shoulder joint)[26]
Subclass Hesperornithes (toothed aquatic flightless birds)
Subclass Ichthyornithes (toothed, but otherwise modern birds)
Subclass Neornithes (all living birds)
Class Mammalia (mammals)
Subclass Prototheria (Monotremata, egg-laying mammals)
Subclass Theria (metatheria (such as marsupials) and eutheria (such as placental mammals))
This rather orderly scheme is the one most commonly found in popular and basic scientific works. It has come under critique from cladistics, as the class Reptilia is paraphyletic—it has given rise to two other classes not included in Reptilia.
Classification into monophyletic taxa
A different approach is adopted by writers who reject paraphyletic groupings. One such classification, by Michael Benton, is presented in simplified form below.[27]
Series Amniota
Class Synapsida
A series of unassigned families, corresponding to Pelycosauria
Order Therapsida
Class Mammalia – mammals
Class Sauropsida
Subclass Parareptilia
Family Mesosauridae †
Family Millerettidae †
Family Bolosauridae †
Family Procolophonidae †
Order Pareiasauromorpha
Family Nycteroleteridae †
Family Pareiasauridae †
Subclass Eureptilia
Family Captorhinidae †
Infraclass Diapsida
Family Araeoscelididae †
Family Weigeltisauridae †
Order Younginiformes †
Infraclass Neodiapsida
Order Testudinata
Suborder Testudines – turtles
Infraclass Lepidosauromorpha
Unnamed infrasubclass
Infraclass Ichthyosauria †
Order Thalattosauria †
Superorder Lepidosauriformes
Order Sphenodontida – tuatara
Order Squamata – lizards & snakes
Infrasubclass Sauropterygia †
Order Placodontia †
Order Eosauropterygia †
Suborder Pachypleurosauria †
Suborder Nothosauria †
Order Plesiosauria †
Infraclass Archosauromorpha
Family Trilophosauridae †
Order Rhynchosauria †
Order Protorosauria †
Division Archosauriformes
Subdivision Archosauria
Infradivision Crurotarsi
Order Phytosauria†
Family Ornithosuchidae †
Family Stagonolepididae †
Family Rauisuchidae †
Superfamily Poposauroidea †
Superorder Crocodylomorpha
Order Crocodylia – crocodilians
Infradivision Avemetatarsalia
Infrasubdivision Ornithodira
Order Pterosauria †
Family Lagerpetidae †
Family Silesauridae †
Superorder Dinosauria – dinosaurs
Order Ornithischia †
Order Saurischia
Suborder Theropoda - theropods
Class Aves – birds
Phylogenetic classification
Further information: Phylogenetic nomenclature
With the advent of cladistics, other researchers have attempted to establish new classes, based on phylogeny, but disregarding the physiological and anatomical unity of the groups. Unlike Benton, for example, Jacques Gauthier and colleagues forwarded a definition of Amniota in 1988 as "the most recent common ancestor of extant mammals and reptiles, and all its descendants".[19] As Gauthier makes use of a crown group definition, Amniota has a slightly different content than the biological amniotes as defined by an apomorphy.[28] Though traditionally considered reptiliomorphs, some recent research has recovered diadectomorphs as the sister group to Synapsida within Amniota, based on inner ear anatomy.[29][30][31]
Cladogram
The cladogram presented here illustrates the phylogeny (family tree) of amniotes, and follows a simplified version of the relationships found by Laurin & Reisz (1995),[32] with the exception of turtles, which more recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies placed firmly within diapsids.[33][34][35][36][37][38] The cladogram covers the group as defined under Gauthier's definition.
| Reptiliomorpha |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
Paton, R. L.; Smithson, T. R.; Clack, J. A. (8 April 1999). "An amniote-like skeleton from the Early Carboniferous of Scotland". Nature. 398 (6727): 508–513. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..508P. doi:10.1038/19071. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 204992355.
Irmis, R. B.; Parker, W. G. (2005). "Unusual tetrapod teeth from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation, Arizona, USA" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 42 (7): 1339–1345. Bibcode:2005CaJES..42.1339I. doi:10.1139/e05-031. S2CID 46418796.
Benton, Michael J. (1997). Vertebrate Palaeontology. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 105–109. ISBN 978-0-412-73810-4.
Cieri, R.L., Hatch, S.T., Capano, J.G. et al. Locomotor rib kinematics in two species of lizards and a new hypothesis for the evolution of aspiration breathing in amniotes. Sci Rep 10, 7739 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64140-y
Janis, C. M., Napoli, J. G., & Warren, D. E. (2020). Palaeophysiology of pH regulation in tetrapods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375 (1793), 20190131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0131
Hickman, Cleveland P., Jr. Integrated principles of zoology (Seventeenth ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 563–567. ISBN 9781259562310.
Kardong, Kenneth V. Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780073524238.
Clack, Jennifer A. Gaining Ground: The Origin and Evolution of Tetrapods. Indiana University Press. p. 370. ISBN 9780253356758.
Benton, M.J.; Donoghue, P.C.J. (2006). "Palaeontological evidence to date the tree of life". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 24 (1): 26–53. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl150. PMID 17047029.
Oxford English Dictionary
Alexander M. Schreiber; Donald D. Brown (2003). "Tadpole skin dies autonomously in response to thyroid hormone at metamorphosis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100 (4): 1769–1774. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.1769S. doi:10.1073/pnas.252774999. PMC 149908. PMID 12560472.
"the_mid_palaeozoic_biotic_crisis - Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton - University of Southampton".
Stewart J. R. (1997): Morphology and evolution of the egg of oviparous amniotes. In: S. Sumida and K. Martin (ed.) Amniote Origins-Completing the Transition to Land (1): 291–326. London: Academic Press.
Cunningham, B.; Huene, E. (Jul–Aug 1938). "Further Studies on Water Absorption by Reptile Eggs". The American Naturalist. 72 (741): 380–385. doi:10.1086/280791. JSTOR 2457547. S2CID 84258651.
Shell Game » American Scientist
Michel Laurin (2004). "The evolution of body size, Cope's rule and the origin of amniotes". Systematic Biology. 53 (4): 594–622. doi:10.1080/10635150490445706. PMID 15371249.
Gomez‐Mestre - 2012 - Evolution - Wiley Online Library
Lombard, R. E. & Bolt, J. R. (1979): Evolution of the tetrapod ear: an analysis and reinterpretation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society No 11: pp 19–76 Abstract
Gauthier, J., Kluge, A.G. and Rowe, T. (1988). "The early evolution of the Amniota." Pp. 103–155 in Benton, M.J. (ed.), The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, Volume 1: amphibians, reptiles, birds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Falcon-Lang, H J; Benton, M J; Stimson, M (2007). "Ecology of early reptiles inferred from Lower Pennsylvanian trackways". Journal of the Geological Society. 164 (6): 1113–1118. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.06.020.
Romer A S and Parsons T S (1985) The Vertebrate Body. (6th ed.) Saunders, Philadelphia.
Carroll, R. L. (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, WH Freeman & Co.
Hildebrand, M. & G. E. Goslow, Jr. Principal ill. Viola Hildebrand. (2001). Analysis of vertebrate structure. New York: Wiley. p. 429. ISBN 978-0-471-29505-1.
Colbert, E.H. & Morales, M. (2001): Colbert's Evolution of the Vertebrates: A History of the Backboned Animals Through Time. 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York — ISBN 978-0-471-38461-8.
Reeder, Tod W.; Townsend, Ted M.; Mulcahy, Daniel G.; Noonan, Brice P.; Wood, Perry L.; Sites, Jack W.; Wiens, John J. (2015). "Integrated Analyses Resolve Conflicts over Squamate Reptile Phylogeny and Reveal Unexpected Placements for Fossil Taxa". PLOS ONE. 10 (3): e0118199. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1018199R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118199. PMC 4372529. PMID 25803280.
*Hope, S. (2002) The Mesozoic record of Neornithes (modern birds). In: Chiappe, L.M. and Witmer, L.M. (eds.): Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs: 339–388. University of California Press, Berkeley. ISBN 0-520-20094-2
Benton, M.J. (2015). "Appendix: Classification of the Vertebrates". Vertebrate Paleontology (4th ed.). Wiley Blackwell. 433–447. ISBN 978-1-118-40684-7.
Lee, M.S.Y. & Spencer, P.S. (1997): Crown clades, key characters and taxonomic stability: when is an amniote not an amniote? In: Sumida S.S. & Martin K.L.M. (eds.) Amniote Origins: completing the transition to land. Academic Press, pp 61–84. Google books
David S. Berman (2013). "Diadectomorphs, amniotes or not?". New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. 60: 22–35.
Jozef Klembara; Miroslav Hain; Marcello Ruta; David S. Berman; Stephanie E. Pierce; Amy C. Henrici (2019). "Inner ear morphology of diadectomorphs and seymouriamorphs (Tetrapoda) uncovered by high‐resolution x‐ray microcomputed tomography, and the origin of the amniote crown group". Palaeontology. 63: 131–154. doi:10.1111/pala.12448.
Klembara, Jozef; Ruta, Marcello; Hain, Miroslav; Berman, David S. (2021). "Braincase and Inner Ear Anatomy of the Late Carboniferous Tetrapod Limnoscelis dynatis (Diadectomorpha) Revealed by High-Resolution X-ray Microcomputed Tomography". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.709766. ISSN 2296-701X.
Laurin, M.; Reisz, R.R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny" (PDF). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-06-08. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
Rieppel, O.; DeBraga, M. (1996). "Turtles as diapsid reptiles". Nature. 384 (6608): 453–5. Bibcode:1996Natur.384..453R. doi:10.1038/384453a0. S2CID 4264378.
Müller, Johannes (2004). "The relationships among diapsid reptiles and the influence of taxon selection". In Arratia, G; Wilson, M.V.H.; Cloutier, R. (eds.). Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. pp. 379–408. ISBN 978-3-89937-052-2.
Tyler R. Lyson; Erik A. Sperling; Alysha M. Heimberg; Jacques A. Gauthier; Benjamin L. King; Kevin J. Peterson (2012-02-23). "MicroRNAs support a turtle + lizard clade". Biology Letters. 8 (1): 104–107. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0477. PMC 3259949. PMID 21775315.
Iwabe, N.; Hara, Y.; Kumazawa, Y.; Shibamoto, K.; Saito, Y.; Miyata, T.; Katoh, K. (2004-12-29). "Sister group relationship of turtles to the bird-crocodilian clade revealed by nuclear DNA-coded proteins". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 22 (4): 810–813. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi075. PMID 15625185.
Roos, Jonas; Aggarwal, Ramesh K.; Janke, Axel (Nov 2007). "Extended mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses yield new insight into crocodylian evolution and their survival of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 45 (2): 663–673. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.018. PMID 17719245.
Katsu, Y.; Braun, E. L.; Guillette, L. J. Jr.; Iguchi, T. (2010-03-17). "From reptilian phylogenomics to reptilian genomes: analyses of c-Jun and DJ-1 proto-oncogenes". Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 127 (2–4): 79–93. doi:10.1159/000297715. PMID 20234127. S2CID 12116018.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
