Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Unikonta
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
Cladus: Sarcopterygii
Cladus: Rhipidistia
Cladus: Tetrapodomorpha
Cladus: Eotetrapodiformes
Cladus: Elpistostegalia
Superclassis: Tetrapoda
Cladus: Reptiliomorpha
Cladus: Amniota
Classis: Reptilia
Cladus: Eureptilia
Cladus: Romeriida
Subclassis: Diapsida
Cladus: Sauria
Infraclassis: Archosauromorpha
Cladus: Crurotarsi
Divisio: Archosauria
Cladus: Avemetatarsalia
Cladus: Ornithodira
Subtaxon: Dinosauromorpha
Cladus: Dinosauriformes
Cladus: Dracohors
Cladus: Dinosauria
Ordo: Saurischia
Cladus: Eusaurischia
Subordo: Theropoda
Cladus: Neotheropoda
Cladus: Averostra
Cladus: Tetanurae
Cladus: Avetheropoda
Cladus: Coelurosauria
Cladus: Tyrannoraptora
Cladus: Maniraptoromorpha
Cladus: Maniraptoriformes
Cladus: Maniraptora
Cladus: Pennaraptora
Cladus: Paraves
Cladus: Eumaniraptora
Cladus: Avialae
Infraclassis: Aves
Cladus: Euavialae
Cladus: Avebrevicauda
Cladus: Pygostylia
Cladus: Ornithothoraces
Cladus: Ornithuromorpha
Cladus: Carinatae
Parvclassis: Neornithes
Cohors: Neognathae
Cladus: Neoaves
Ordo: Strigiformes
Familia: Strigidae
Subfamiliae: Asioninae - Striginae - Surniinae
Name
Strigidae Leach, 1820
References
Primary references
Leach, W.E. 1820. Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum: Eleventh Room. British Museum. London. 17th edition: 65–70. (Although the name of the author is not specified in the document, Leach was the Keeper of Zoology at the time). BHL DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.144385 Reference page. p. 66 BHL
Additional references
Salter, J.F., Oliveros, C.H., Hosner, P.A., Manthey, J.D., Robbins, M.B., Moyle, R.G., Brumfield, R.T. & Faircloth, B.C. 2019. Extensive paraphyly in the typical owl family (Strigidae). The Auk. 137 (ukz070). DOI: 10.1093/auk/ukz070 Open access Reference page.
Vernacular names
Akan: Patuo
беларуская: Савіныя
català: Estrígid
čeština: puštíkovití
dansk: Egentlige ugler
Deutsch: Eigentliche Eulen
English: Typical Owls
Esperanto: Strigedoj
suomi: Pöllöt
Nordfriisk: Kadüülen
Frysk: Ulefûgels
עברית: ינשופיים
hrvatski: Sove
magyar: bagolyfélék
հայերեն: Բվեր
日本語: フクロウ科
한국어: 올빼미과, 부엉이
lietuvių: Tikrosios pelėdos
македонски: Утки
മലയാളം: നത്ത്
эрзянь: Корш
Nederlands: Uilen
norsk nynorsk: Uglefamilien
norsk: Egentlige ugler
polski: puszczykowate
русский: Совиные
davvisámegiella: Skuolffit
svenska: Äkta ugglor
Kiswahili: Bundi
ไทย: วงศ์นกเค้าแมว
Türkçe: Baykuşgiller
українська: Справжні сови
中文: 鸱鸮科
The true owls or typical owls (family Strigidae) are one of the two generally accepted families of owls, the other being the barn owls (Tytonidae). This large family comprises 230 living or recently extinct species in 24 genera. The typical owls have a cosmopolitan distribution and are found on every continent except Antarctica.
Morphology
Cross sectioned great grey owl specimen showing the extent of the body plumage, Zoological Museum, Copenhagen
While typical owls (hereafter referred to simply as owls) vary greatly in size, with the smallest species, the elf owl, being a hundredth the size of the largest, the Eurasian eagle-owl and Blakiston's fish owl, owls generally share an extremely similar body plan.[1] They tend to have large heads, short tails, cryptic plumage, and round facial discs around the eyes. The family is generally arboreal (with a few exceptions like the burrowing owl) and obtain their food on the wing. The wings are large, broad, rounded, and long. As is the case with most birds of prey, in many owl species females are larger than males.[2]
Because of their nocturnal habits, they tend not to exhibit sexual dimorphism in their plumage. Specialized feathers and wing shape suppress the noise produced by flying, both taking off, flapping and gliding.[3] This silent flight allows owls to hunt without being heard by their prey. Owls possess three physical attributes that are thought to contribute to their silent flight capability. First, on the leading edge of the wing, there is a comb of stiff feathers. Second, the trailing edge of the wing contains a flexible fringe.[4] Finally, owls have downy material distributed on the tops of their wings that creates a compliant but rough surface (similar to that of a soft carpet). All these factors result in significant aerodynamic noise reductions.[5] The toes and tarsi are feathered in some species, and more so in species at higher latitudes.[6] Numerous species of owls in the genus Glaucidium and the northern hawk-owl have eye patches on the backs of their heads, apparently to convince other birds they are being watched at all times. Numerous nocturnal species have ear-tufts, feathers on the sides of the head that are thought to have a camouflage function, breaking up the outline of a roosting bird. The feathers of the facial disc are arranged in order to increase sound delivered to the ears. Hearing in owls is highly sensitive and the ears are asymmetrical allowing the owl to localise a sound in multiple directions. Owls can pinpoint the position of prey, such as a squeaking mouse, by computing when the sound from the object reaches the owl's ears. If the sound reaches the left ear first, the mouse must be to the left of the owl. The owl's brain will then direct the head to directly face the mouse.[7] In addition to hearing, owls have massive eyes relative to their body size. Contrary to popular belief, however, owls cannot see well in extreme dark and are able to see well in the day.[1]
Owls are also able to rotate their heads by as much as 270 degrees in either direction without damaging the blood vessels in their necks and heads, and without disrupting blood flow to their brains. Researchers have found four major biological adaptations that allow for this unique capability. First, in the neck there is a major artery, called the vertebral artery, that feeds the brain. This artery passes through bony holes in the vertebra. These bony holes are ten times larger in diameter than the artery that passes through them (extra space in the transverse foramina). This creates cushiony air pockets[clarification needed] that allow for more movement of the artery when twisted. 12 of the 14 cervical vertebrae in the owl's neck have this adaptation. This vertebral artery also enters the neck higher up than it does in other birds. Instead of going in at the 14th cervical vertebrae, it enters in at the 12th cervical vertebrae. Finally, the small vessel connection between the carotid and the vertebral arteries allow the exchanging of blood between two blood vessels. These cross connections allow for uninterrupted blood flow to the brain. This means that even if one route is blocked during extreme head rotations, another route can continue blood circulation to the brain.[8]
Several owl species also have fluorescent pigments called porphyrins under their wings. A large group of pigments defined by nitrogen-containing pyrole rings, including chlorophyll and heme (in animal blood), make up the porphyrins. Other bird species will use porphyrins to pigment eggshells in the oviduct. Owl species, however, use porphyrins as a pigment in their plumage. Porphyrins are most prevalent in new feathers and are easily destroyed by sunlight. Porphyrin pigments in feathers fluoresce under UV light, allowing biologists to more accurately classify the age of owls. The relative ages of the feathers are differentiated by the intensity of fluorescence that they emit when the primaries and secondaries are exposed to black light. This method helps to detect the subtle differences between third and fourth generation feathers, whereas looking at wear and color makes age determination difficult.[9]
Niche competition
It has been noted that there is some competition for niche space between the spotted owl and the barred owl (both of which are true owls) . This competition is related to deforestation, and therefore a reduction in niche quantity and quality. This deforestation is more specifically the result of overlogging and forest fires. These two species of owl are known to traditionally live in mature forests of old and tall trees, which at this point in time are mostly limited to public lands. As niche overlap is occurring in these two families, there is a concern with the barred owls encroaching on the spotted owl's North American habitats, causing a decline of the spotted owl.[10] As noted above, these species prefer mature forests which, due to deforestation, are at limited supply and take a long time to reestablish after deforestation has occurred. Because the northern spotted owl shares its territories and competes with other species, it is declining at a more rapid pace. This invasion by barred owls occurred about 50 years ago in the Pacific Northwest, and despite their low numbers, they are considered an invasive species because of the harm done to native spotted owls. In this competition for resources, hunting locations and general niches, the barred owl is pushing the spotted owl to local extinction. It is thought that the rapid decrease in population size of spotted owls will cause a trophic cascade, since the spotted owls help provide a healthy ecosystem.[11]
Behaviour
Owls are generally nocturnal and/or crepuscular and spend much of the day roosting. They are often misperceived as ‘tame’ since they allow humans to approach quite closely before taking flight, but in reality they are attempting to avoid detection through stillness. Their cryptic plumage and the inconspicuous locations they adopt are an effort to avoid predators and mobbing by small birds.[12]
Communication
Owls, such as the eagle-owl, will use visual signaling in intraspecific communication (communication within the species), both in territorial habits and parent-offspring interactions. Some researchers believe owls can employ various visual signals in other situations involving intraspecific interaction. Experimental evidence suggests that owl feces and the remains of prey can act as visual signals. This new type of signaling behavior could potentially indicate the owls' current reproductive state to intruders, including other territorial owls or non-breeding floaters. Feces are an ideal material for marking due to its minimal energetic costs, and can also continue to indicate territorial boundaries even when occupied in activities other than territorial defense. Preliminary evidence also suggests that owls will use feces and the feathers of their prey to signal their breeding status to members within the same species.[13]
Migration
Some species of owl are migratory. One such species, the northern saw-whet owl, migrates south even when food and resources are ample in the north.[14]
Habitat, climate and seasonal changes
Some owls have a higher survival rate and are more likely to reproduce in a habitat that contains a mixture of old growth forests and other vegetation types. Old growth forests provide ample dark areas for owls to hide from predators [15] Like many organisms, spotted owls rely on forest fires to create their habitat and provide areas for foraging. Unfortunately, climate change and intentional fire suppression have altered natural fire habits. Owls avoid badly burned areas but they benefit from the mosaics of heterogeneous habitats created by fires. This is not to say that all fires are good for owls. Owls only thrive when fires are not of high severity and not large stand-replacing (high-severity fires that burn most of the vegetation) which create large canopy gaps that are not adequate for owls.[16]
Parasites
Avian malaria or Plasmodium relictum affects owls and specifically, 44% of northern and Californian spotted owls harbor 17 strains of the parasite. As mentioned in the niche competition section above, spotted owls and barred owls are in competition so their niche overlap may be resulting in the plasmodium parasite having more hosts in a concentrated area but this is not certain.[17]
Predators
The main predators of owls are other species of owls. An example of this occurs with the northern saw-whet owl that lives in the northern U.S. and lives low to the ground in brushy areas typically of cedar forests. These owls eat mice and perch in trees at eye level. Their main predators are barred owls and great horned owls.[18]
Systematics
Skeleton of Strigidae
The family Strigidae was introduced by the English zoologist William Elford Leach in a guide to the contents of the British Museum published in 1820.[19][20]
A molecular phylogenetic study of the owls published in 2019 found that the family Strigidae was divided into two sister clades and some of the traditional genera were paraphyletic. The placement of three monotypic genera remained uncertain due to the degraded nature of the available DNA.[21] Based on these results Frank Gill, Pamela Rasmussen and David Donsker updated the online list of world birds that they maintain on behalf of the International Ornithological Committee (IOC) but as currently defined Pseudoscops is embedded in Asio while Scotopelia and Ketupa are both embedded in Bubo.[22]
| Strigidae |
|
The above cladogram is based on the results of a molecular phylogenetic study by Salter and collaborators published in 2019.[21] The subfamilies are those defined by Edward Dickinson and James Van Remsen Jr. in 2013.[23]
The 235 extant or recently extinct species are assigned to 24 genera:[22]
A tawny owl
The forest owlet, one of the critically endangered owls found in the Central Indian Forest
Genus Uroglaux – Papuan hawk-owl
Genus Ninox – Australasian hawk-owls, 36 species of which one is recently extinct
Genus Margarobyas – bare-legged owl or Cuban screech-owl
Genus Taenioptynx – two species previous placed in Glaucidium
Genus Micrathene – elf owl
Genus Xenoglaux – long-whiskered owlet
Genus Aegolius – saw-whet owls, five species of which one is recently extinct
Genus Athene – nine species
Genus Surnia – northern hawk-owl
Genus Glaucidium – pygmy owls, 29 species
Genus Otus – scops owls, 58 species including three extinct species formerly placed in Mascarenotus
Genus Ptilopsis – white-faced owls, two species
Genus Asio – eared owls, nine species
Genus Jubula – maned owl
Genus Bubo – horned owls, eagle-owls and fish-owls, 20 species
Genus Scotopelia – three species embedded within Bubo
Genus Ketupa – three species embedded within Bubo
Genus Psiloscops – flammulated owl
Genus Gymnasio – Puerto Rican owl
Genus Megascops – screech-owls, 23 species
Genus Pulsatrix – spectacled owls, three species
Genus Lophostrix – crested owl
Genus Strix – earless owls, 23 species, including four previously placed in Ciccaba
Late Quaternary prehistoric extinctions
Genus Grallistrix – stilt-owls, four species
Kaua‘i stilt-owl, Grallistrix auceps
Maui stilt-owl, Grallistrix erdmani
Moloka‘i stilt-owl, Grallistrix geleches
O‘ahu stilt-owl, Grallistrix orion
Genus Ornimegalonyx – Caribbean giant owls, one or two species
Cuban giant owl, Ornimegalonyx oteroi
Ornimegalonyx sp. – probably subspecies of O. oteroi
Genus Asphaltoglaux
Asphalt miniature owl, Asphaltoglaux cecileae
Genus Oraristrix
La Brea owl, Oraristrix brea
Fossil record
Mioglaux (Late Oligocene? – Early Miocene of WC Europe) – includes "Bubo" poirreiri
Intulula (Early/Middle Miocene of WC Europe) – includes "Strix/Ninox" brevis
Alasio (Middle Miocene of Vieux-Collonges, France) – includes "Strix" collongensis
The fossil database for Strigiformes is highly diverse and shows an origin from ~60MYA into the Pleistocene. The maximum age range for the Strigiformes clade extends to 68.6MYA.[24]
Placement unresolved:
"Otus/Strix" wintershofensis – fossil (Early/Middle Miocene of Wintershof West, Germany) – may be close to extant genus Ninox[25]
"Strix" edwardsi – fossil (Middle Miocene of Grive-Saint-Alban, France)
"Asio" pygmaeus – fossil (Early Pliocene of Odessa, Ukraine)
Strigidae gen. et sp. indet. UMMP V31030 (Rexroad Late Pliocene of Kansas, USA) – Strix/Bubo?[26]
Ibiza owl, Strigidae gen. et sp. indet. – prehistoric (Late Pleistocene/Holocene of Es Pouàs, Ibiza)[27]
The supposed fossil heron "Ardea" lignitum (Late Pliocene of Germany) was apparently a strigid owl, possibly close to Bubo.[28] The Early–Middle Eocene genus Palaeoglaux from west-central Europe is sometimes placed here, but given its age, it is probably better considered its own family for the time being.
References
Marks, J. S.; Cannings, R.J. and Mikkola, H. (1999). "Family Strigidae (Typical Owls)". In del Hoyo, J.; Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. (eds.) (1999). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 5: Barn-Owls to Hummingbirds. Lynx Edicions. ISBN 84-87334-25-3
Earhart, Caroline M. & Johnson, Ned K. (1970). "Size dimorphism and food habits of North American owls". Condor. 72 (3): 251–264. doi:10.2307/1366002. JSTOR 1366002.
Wagner, Hermann; Weger, Matthias; Klaas, Michael; Schröder, Wolfgang (6 February 2017). "Features of owl wings that promote silent flight". Interface Focus. 7 (1): 20160078. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2016.0078. PMC 5206597. PMID 28163870.
Hajian, Rozhin & Jaworski, Justin W. (2017). "The steady aerodynamics of aerofoils with porosity gradients". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 473 (2205): 20170266. Bibcode:2017RSPSA.47370266H. doi:10.1098/rspa.2017.0266. PMC 5627374. PMID 28989307.
"The secrets of owls' near noiseless wings". Science Daily. Science Daily. 24 November 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
Kelso L, Kelso E (1936). "The relation of feathering of feet of American owls to humidity of environment and to life zones". Auk. 53 (1): 51–56. doi:10.2307/4077355. JSTOR 4077355.
"An owl's early lessons leave their mark on the brain". Science Daily. Science Daily. 6 March 1998. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
"Scientists explain how bird can rotate its head without cutting off blood supply to the brain". Science Daily. Science Daily. 31 January 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
Weidensaul, C. Scott; Colvin, Bruce A.; Brinker, David F. & Huy, J. Steven (June 2011). "Use of ultraviolet light as an aid in age classification of owls" (PDF). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 123 (2): 373–377. doi:10.1676/09-125.1. S2CID 28913007. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
Wiens, David; Anthony, Robert; Forsman, Eric (April 2011). "Barred owl occupancy surveys within the range of the northern spotted owl". The Journal of Wildlife Management. 75 (3): 531–538. doi:10.1002/jwmg.82. S2CID 54592663.
Yackulic, Charles; Bailey, Larissa; Dugger, Katie; Davis, Raymond; Franklin, Allan; Forseman, Eric; Ackers, Steven; Andrews, Lawrence; Diller, Lowell; Gremel, Scott; Hamm, Keith; Herter, Dale; Higley, J. Mark; McCafferty, Christopher; Reid, Janice; Rockweit, Jeremy & Sovern, Stan (March 2019). "The past and future roles of competition and habitat in the range-wide occupancy dynamics of Northern spotted owls". Ecological Applications. 29 (3): e01861. doi:10.1002/eap.1861. PMID 30835921.
Geggel, Laura (September 19, 2016). "Are All Owls Actually Night Owls?". LiveScience.
Penteriani, Vincenzo & del Mar Delgado, Maria (August 2008). "Owls may use faeces and prey feathers to signal current reproduction" (PDF). PLOS ONE. 3 (8): e3014. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.3014P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003014. PMC 2507733. PMID 18714382.
"Avian malaria behind drastic decline of London's iconic sparrow?". Science Daily. 16 July 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019.
"Taking The Long View: Examining Factors Which Influence Northern Spotted Owls". Science Daily. Science Daily. Retrieved 24 November 2019.
Eyes, Stephanie; Roberts, Susan & Johnson, Mathew (May 2017). "California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) habitat use patterns in a burned landscape" (PDF). The Condor: Ornithological Applications. 119 (3): 375–388. doi:10.1650/CONDOR-16-184.1.
Ishack, Heather; Dumbacher, John; Anderson, Nancy; Keane, John; Valkiūnas, Gediminas; Haig, Susan; Tell, Lisa; Sehgal, Ravinder (2008). "Blood parasites in owls with conservation implications for the spotted owl (Strix occidentalis)". PLOS ONE. 3 (5): e2304. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2304I. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002304. PMC 2387065. PMID 18509541.
Voous, Karel H. (1988) Owls of the Northern Hemisphere. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262220354
Leach, William Elford (1820). "Eleventh Room". Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum. Vol. 17 (17th ed.). London: British Museum. p. 66. Although the name of the author is not specified in the document, Leach was the Assistant Keeper responsible for the zoological collections at the time.
Bock, Walter J. (1994). History and nomenclature of avian family-group names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. Number 222. New York: American Museum of Natural History. p. 142. hdl:2246/830.
Salter, J.F.; Oliveros, C.H.; Hosner, P.A.; Manthey, J.D.; Robbins, M.B.; Moyle, R.G.; Brumfield, R.T.; Faircloth, B.C. (2020). "Extensive paraphyly in the typical owl family (Strigidae)". The Auk. 137 (ukz070). doi:10.1093/auk/ukz070.
Gill, Frank; Donsker, David; Rasmussen, Pamela, eds. (January 2021). "Owls". IOC World Bird List Version 11.1. International Ornithologists' Union. Retrieved 18 May 2021.
Dickinson, E.C.; Remsen, J.V., Jr., eds. (2013). The Howard & Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1: Non-passerines (4th ed.). Eastbourne, UK: Aves Press. pp. 258–277. ISBN 978-0-9568611-0-8.
Kurochkin, E.N.; Dyke, G.J. (2011). "The first fossil owls (Aves: Strigiformes) from the Paleogene of Asia and a review of the fossil record of Strigiformes". Paleontological Journal. 4 (45): 445–458. doi:10.1134/s003103011104006x. S2CID 84397725.
Olson, p. 131
Feduccia, J. Alan; Ford, Norman L. (1970). "Some birds of prey from the Upper Pliocene of Kansas" (PDF). Auk. 87 (4): 795–797. doi:10.2307/4083714. JSTOR 4083714.
Sánchez Marco, Antonio (2004). "Avian zoogeographical patterns during the Quaternary in the Mediterranean region and paleoclimatic interpretation" (PDF). Ardeola. 51 (1): 91–132.
Olson, p. 167
Bibliography
Olson, Storrs L. (1985). The fossil record of birds. In: Farner, D.S.; King, J.R. & Parkes, Kenneth C. (eds.): Avian Biology 8: 79–238. Academic Press, New York.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
