Fine Art

Contopus cooperi

Contopus cooperi

Life-forms

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Unikonta
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
Cladus: Sarcopterygii
Cladus: Rhipidistia
Cladus: Tetrapodomorpha
Cladus: Eotetrapodiformes
Cladus: Elpistostegalia
Superclassis: Tetrapoda
Cladus: Reptiliomorpha
Cladus: Amniota
Classis: Reptilia
Cladus: Eureptilia
Cladus: Romeriida
Subclassis: Diapsida
Cladus: Sauria
Infraclassis: Archosauromorpha
Cladus: Crurotarsi
Divisio: Archosauria
Cladus: Avemetatarsalia
Cladus: Ornithodira
Subtaxon: Dinosauromorpha
Cladus: Dinosauriformes
Cladus: Dracohors
Cladus: Dinosauria
Cladus: Saurischia
Cladus: Eusaurischia
Subordo: Theropoda
Cladus: Neotheropoda
Cladus: Averostra
Cladus: Tetanurae
Cladus: Avetheropoda
Cladus: Coelurosauria
Cladus: Tyrannoraptora
Cladus: Maniraptoromorpha
Cladus: Maniraptoriformes
Cladus: Maniraptora
Cladus: Pennaraptora
Cladus: Paraves
Cladus: Eumaniraptora
Cladus: Avialae
Infraclassis: Aves
Cladus: Avebrevicauda
Cladus: Pygostylia
Cladus: Ornithothoraces
Cladus: Ornithuromorpha
Cladus: Carinatae
Parvclassis: Neornithes
Cohors: Neognathae
Cladus: Neoaves
Cladus: Telluraves
Cladus: Australaves
Ordo: Passeriformes
Subordo: Tyranni
Infraordo: Tyrannides
Parvordo: Tyrannida

Familia: Tyrannidae
Genus: Contopus
Species: Contopus cooperi
Subspecies:

Synonym: C. c. majorinus

Name

Contopus cooperi (Nuttall, 1831)
Synonymy

Muscicapa cooperi (protonym)
Muscicapa inornata Nuttall, 1832
Tyrannus borealis Swainson, 1831 Fauna Bor.Am. p. 141 BHL
Nuttallornis borealis (Swainson, 1831)
Contopus borealis (Swainson, 1831)
Contopus mesoleucus P.L. Sclater, 1859 PZS p. 43 BHL
Nuttallornis mesoleucus (P.L. Sclater, 1859)

References

Nuttall, T. 1832. A manual of the ornithology of the United States and of Canada. The land Birds. Hilliard and Brown. Cambridge. 1: 1–683 DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.137767 BHL Reference page. p. 282

Vernacular names
English: Olive-sided Flycatcher
español: Pibí boreal

The olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) is a small to medium sized passerine bird in the family Tyrannidae, the Tyrant flycatcher family. It is a migratory species that travels from South to North America to breed during the summer. It is a very agile flyer and mainly consumes flying insects on flight. Since 2016, this species has been assessed as being near-threatened globally (IUCN) and threatened in Canada (SRA) due to its declining populations.
Description
Identification

Olive-sided flycatchers are migratory songbirds which are relatively small. It is qualified as small to medium-sized birds and are estimated to be smaller than American robins, but bigger than sparrows. The olive-sided flycatcher can be identified by its olive-grey or grey-brownish plumage above and with a white mid-breast section and throat. The olive tones on its back and wings are seen mainly in optimal light and when the feathers are freshly moulted. The sides of the breast area are grey and make the bird look like it is wearing a vest (see Fig. 2). It has a relatively long bill and long wings for its size. Sometimes, some of its head feathers can be raised which make it look like it has a small crest. The species does not exhibit sexual dimorphism, which means that male and female look similar. Olive-sided flycatchers perch in upright positions on top of dead branches or trees.[2]
Measurements[2] Length 7.1-7.9 in (18-20 cm)
Weight 1.0-1.4 oz (28-40.4 g)
Wingspan 12.4-13.6 in (31.5-34.5 cm)
Similar species

Olive-sided flycatchers can be confused with other birds in the genus Contopus like the Greater Pewee, Western Wood-Pewee, Eastern Wood-Pewee, and the Eastern Phoebe. They can be distinguished these species by observing the following differences: the plain grey breasts of the greater pewee (as opposed to the vest-like chest of the olive-sided flycatcher), they are twice the weight of the western and eastern wood pewees, and the eastern phoebe has more white underparts than the olive-sided flycatcher.[2]
Taxonomy

Olive-sided flycatchers (Contopus cooperi) are part of the class Aves in the order Passeriformes, meaning they are passerines which are known as perching or song birds. They are part of the family Tyrannidae because they are Tyrant flycatchers found in America and they belong to the genus Contopus which is the Pewee taxon. Pewees are known as being insect eaters who catch their prey generally in flight.[3]

The species has often been considered to be monotypic; the Clements Checklist and AOS Checklist of North American Birds currently do not recognize any subspecies. However, the disjunct populations that breeds in southern California and Baja California is sometimes recognized as a distinct subspecies, C. cooperi majorinus. [4][5] This subspecies is a short-distance migrant and has longer wings and tail feathers than birds from elsewhere. [6]
Distribution and habitat

The olive-sided flycatcher is distributed throughout North and South America. Its breeding habitat ranges from California to New Mexico, all the way up to central Alaska, then across Canada (except for most of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut) and through a portion of northeastern US. Its non-breeding habitat is mainly in the northern part of South America and a small area in Central America.[7]

Their breeding habitat is mainly in open areas or edges of boreal, coniferous forests or temperate western forests, in areas up to 10,000 feet in elevation (e.g., in the Rockies), and always near water. They can also nest in cities or on farms. In their non-breeding habitat, olive-sided flycatchers use similar habitats as their breeding habitats such as open areas and forest edges, but do not need water proximity as much as in their breeding habitat. They are also associated to habitats with very tall trees.[8] Two forest habitats used by olive-sided flycatchers in the winter are tropical montane and tropical lowland evergreen forests.[9]
Behaviour

A study made in the Northwest Territories determined flight behaviours of olive-sided flycatchers near their nests. Results show that four out of eight males would fly from 0 m to 49 m away from their nest and would sing only when at a distance of more than 100 m. It was also found that pairs whose nests were in more open areas did not travel as far than when nests were deeper in the forest.[10]
Vocalizations

Vocalizations are made by songbirds through songs which are for breeding purposes or through calls to communicate with other individuals of its species. During the breeding, olive-sided flycatcher males sing a song to attract a mate. Its song sounds like it is saying “Quick, three beers!” with three successive high-pitched sounds. The first sound is shorter and not as high-pitched and loud as the two others. Sometimes, during mating season, males can produce growling sounds or even squeaks when in conflict with other males. Calls are produced by birds to communicate with one another. This species' most frequent call is 3 quick successive pip sounds.[11]

The rate at which males sing varies throughout the breeding season. This variation appears to be correlated indirectly with the breeding status (single, paired, or feeding young) of the individuals.[12]
Reproduction

Olive-sided flycatchers breed once per year and usually get clutches of 3 to 4 eggs. The incubation period lasts for 15 to 19 days and so does the nestling period. The egg size is approximately 0.8-0.9 inches long by 0.6-0.7 inches wide and is a creamy white colour with brownish spots that form a ring on the larger end of the egg. The nest location is chosen by the female and is usually on a horizontal branch of coniferous trees, but have also been seen on other types of trees. The lowest nest was 5 feet high on a tree and the highest was 197 feet. In Western regions, olive-sided flycatchers tend to have higher nests than in their Eastern distributions. The nest is about 4.6 inches wide on the outside and 2.8 inches wide on the inside and is cup-shaped. The outer part is made with twigs and small branches, while the inside is usually lined with finer material such as grass, lichen, needles, etc. The hatching are born naked and helpless.[8] The male defends a large area around the nesting territory. Both parents feed the young birds.
Olive-sided flycatcher consuming a butterfly.
Diet

Hawking is the main feeding method used by olive-sided flycatchers. They feed on flying insects (e.g., bees, wasps, moths, beetles, grasshoppers, etc.) and capture them in the air. They will sometimes feed on fruit during migration and non-breeding season.[8]

During parental care, olive-sided flycatchers were found to consume its chicks' fecal sacs. Indeed, both sexes appear to do so within the first week of hatchings' lives, then start to remove them from the nest. This behaviour is thought to act as a supplement in the parental nutrition.[13]
Migration

Of all the flycatcher species that breed in the United States, the olive-sided flycatcher has the longest migration. Some olive-sided flycatchers migrate up to 7,000 miles traveling between central Alaska and Bolivia.[14]
Status and conservation

According to the IUCN Red List in 2016, the olive-sided flycatcher is classified as a "near threatened" species.[3] The criteria for a species to fit in this conservation status is when the taxon does not fit within the Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable categories, but is likely to fit within one of them in the near future.[15] The Canadian Species at Risk Act lists the olive-sided flycatcher as threatened due to its declining population.[16]

The olive-sided flycatcher's global population is estimated at 1.9 million individuals but appears to be declining at a rate of 3% of the population per year[9] and has declined by 79% in the past 50 years.[8]
Climate change

With climate change becoming increasingly important and causing important changes in the ecosystems, a study was made in Nova Scotia to predict climate-resilient habitats which would be suitable for olive-sided flycatchers. The authors built a model which considered mean canopy height as the most important factor to consider for this species because it needs a habitat with tall trees. The results suggest that the relative habitat suitability for olive-sided flycatchers in the area of study (Nova Scotia) increased with canopy height and decreased as the habitat moved further away from conifer-dominated forests and areas with dead material which is known to be crucial for their feeding habits. This species is also expected to prefer valleys, lowlands and flatter areas which have the potential to form wetlands or streams. The results from this study determined that the forests used in Nova Scotia have a high potential for olive-sided flycatcher populations to be resilient to climate change.[17]
Threats

A research made in Eastern Canada showed that disturbances caused by human activities and road proximity have a negative impact on olive-sided flycatcher populations in Canadian national parks.[18] This study helped quantify the importance of protected areas for the species.

The loss of wintering habitat might be one of the main causes for its population decline.[8] However, they do not seem to be directly impacted by forest loss, although they might be sensitive to it. Declines in flying insect populations due to insecticide use is what is thought to impact most directly the species. In their non-breeding habitat, on the east slope of Andres, the winter populations are highly threatened, but the exact threats have not yet been identified.[9] Burned or freshly-logged forests are great foraging habitats for the olive-sided flycatchers due to the increased presence of flying insects, but they could be negatively affected in these environments by wildfire suppression techniques or salvage logging.[8] Collisions with communication towers seem to be another cause of mortality threatening olive-sided flycatchers.[19]
References

BirdLife International (2017). "Contopus cooperi". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017: e.T22699787A110734937. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T22699787A110734937.en. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Identification, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2021-11-10.
International), BirdLife International (2016-10-01). "IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Contopus cooperi". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Pyle, Peter (1997). Identification guide to North American birds : a compendium of information on identifying, ageing, and sexing "near-passerines" and passerines in the hand. Steve N. G. Howell, Siobhan Ruck, Institute for Bird Populations, Point Reyes Bird Observatory. Bolinas, Calif.: Slate Creek Press. ISBN 0-9618940-2-4. OCLC 38593534.
Altman, Bob; Sallabanks, Rex (2020). "Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi), version 1.0". Birds of the World. doi:10.2173/bow.olsfly.01.
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Identification, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2023-02-24.
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Range Map, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2021-11-11.
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Life History, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2021-11-11.
"Avian Conservation Assessment Database Scores – Partners in Flight Databases". Retrieved 2021-11-12.
Short, Lucas (2017). Flight distances from nests and behaviours of the olive-sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) (Thesis thesis).
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Sounds, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2021-11-11.
Upham-Mills, Emily J.; Reimer, Jody R.; Haché, Samuel; Lele, Subhash R.; Bayne, Erin M. (2020). "Can singing rate be used to predict male breeding status of forest songbirds? A comparison of three calibration models". Ecosphere. 11 (1): e03005. Bibcode:2020Ecosp..11E3005U. doi:10.1002/ecs2.3005. ISSN 2150-8925.
Hagelin, Julie C.; Busby, Shannon; Harding-Scurr, April; Brinkman, Aleya R. (2015-06-01). "Observations on Fecal Sac Consumption and Near-ground Foraging Behavior in the Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi)". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 127 (2): 332–336. doi:10.1676/wils-127-02-332-336.1. ISSN 1559-4491. S2CID 83775008.
"Olive-sided Flycatcher Overview, All About Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology". www.allaboutbirds.org. Retrieved 2020-09-27.
IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1, second edition. IUCN. 2012. ISBN 978-2-8317-1435-6.
Branch, Legislative Services (2021-08-12). "Consolidated federal laws of canada, Species at Risk Act". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Retrieved 2021-11-12.
Bale, Shannon; Beazley, Karen F; Westwood, Alana; Bush, Peter (2020-03-10). "The benefits of using topographic features to predict climate-resilient habitat for migratory forest landbirds: An example for the rusty blackbird, olive-sided flycatcher, and Canada warbler". The Condor. 122 (1): duz057. doi:10.1093/condor/duz057. ISSN 0010-5422.
Westwood, Alana R.; Staicer, Cindy; Sólymos, Péter; Haché, Samuel; Fontaine, Trish; Bayne, Erin M.; Mazerolle, Dan (2019). "Estimating the conservation value of protected areas in Maritime Canada for two species at risk: the Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) and Canada Warbler (Cardellina canadensis)". Avian Conservation and Ecology. 14 (1): art16. doi:10.5751/ACE-01359-140116. ISSN 1712-6568.

Longcore, Travis; Rich, Catherine; Mineau, Pierre; MacDonald, Beau; Bert, Daniel; Sullivan, Lauren; Mutrie, Erin; Gauthreaux, Sidney; Avery, Michael; Crawford, Robert; Manville, Albert (2013). "Avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada: which species, how many, and where?". USDA Wildlife Services - Staff Publications.

Further reading

Willis, E.O.; Snow, D.W.; Stotz, D.F. & Parker III, T.A. (1993) Olive-sided Flycatchers in Southeastern Brazil Wilson Bulletin 105(1):

Birds, Fine Art Prints

Birds Images

Biology Encyclopedia

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License

Home - Hellenica World