Thuja plicata

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Regnum: Plantae
Divisio: Tracheophyta
Divisio: Pinophyta
Classis: Pinopsida
Ordo: Pinales

Familia: Cupressaceae
Subfamilia: Cupressoideae
Genus: Thuja
Species: Thuja plicata
Name

Thuja plicata Donn ex D.Don in A.B.Lambert, Descr. Pinus 2: 19 (1824).
Synonyms

Homotypic
Thuja occidentalis var. plicata (Donn ex D.Don) Loudon ex Hoopes, Book Evergr.: 321 (1868).
Heterotypic
Thuja wareana Lodd. ex Loudon, Arbor. Frutic. Brit. 4: 2654 (1838).
Thuja menziesii Douglas ex Endl., Syn. Conif.: 52 (1847).
Thuja lobbiana Gordon, Pinetum: 323 (1858).
Thuja lobbii Gordon, Pinetum: 323 (1858).
Libocedrus craigiana H.Low ex Gordon, Pinetum, Suppl.: 102 (1862), nom. inval.
Libocedrus gigantea H.Low ex Gordon, Pinetum, Suppl.: 102 (1862), nom. inval.
Thuja asplenifolia Carrière, Traité Gén. Conif., ed. 2: 106 (1867), pro syn.
Thuja menziesii var. fastigiata Carrière, Traité Gén. Conif., ed. 2: 197 (1867)
Thuja douglasii Nutt. ex Parl. in A.P.de Candolle, Prodr. 16(2): 457 (1868), pro syn.
Thuja californica K.Koch, Dendrologie 2(2): 177 (1873).
Thuja gigantea var. atrovirens Gordon, Pinetum, ed. 2: 430 (1875).
Thuja wareana var. aurea Pynaert, Nursery Cat. (Éd. Pynaert - Van Geert) 1886: 15 (1886).
Thuja flabellata Beissn., Handb. Nadelholzk.: 42 (1891).
Thuja lycopodioides Beissn., Handb. Nadelholzk.: 44 (1891).
Thuja plicatilis Beissn., Handb. Nadelholzk.: 44 (1891).
Thuja plicata var. penduliformis Sudw., Bull. Div. Forest. U.S.D.A. 14: 73 (1897), nom. nud.
Thuja gigantea var. pendula Beissn., Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 11: 74 (1902).
Thuja plicata f. fastigiata (Carrière) C.K.Schneid. in E.E.Silva Tarouca, Uns. Freil.-Nadelhölzer: 285 (1913).
Thuja plicata f. atrovirens (Gordon) O.L.Lipa, Dendrofl. URSR 1: 142 (1939).
Thuja plicata f. pendula (Beissn.) Rehder, Bibl. Cult. Trees: 47 (1949).

References

Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds.) 1993. Flora Europaea. Volume 1: Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) / New York / Melbourne, xlvi + 581 pp., ISBN 0-521-41007-X. Reference page.
Farjon, A. 2010. A Handbook of the World's Conifers. Koninklijke Brill, Leiden. ISBN 90-04-17718-3. Reference page.
Farjon, A., 2013. Thuja plicata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013. IUCN Red List Category: Least Concern. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42263A2968155.en. Reference page.
Govaerts, R. et al. 2019. Thuja plicata in World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published online. Accessed: 2019 June 7. Reference page.
International Plant Names Index. 2019. Thuja plicata. Published online. Accessed: June 7 2019.

Vernacular names
dansk: Kæmpe-Thuja
Deutsch: Riesen-Lebensbaum
English: Western Redcedar
español: Tuya
suomi: Jättituija
français: Thuya géant
galego: Tuia xigante
hrvatski: Tuja azijska golema
magyar: Óriás tuja
日本語: ベイスギ
Nederlands: Reuzenlevensboom
polski: Żywotnik olbrzymi
Türkçe: Boylu mazı
Distribution
Native distribution areas:

Northern America
Northwestern U.S.A.
Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington.
Southwestern U.S.A
California.
Subarctic America
Alaska.
Western Canada
Alberta, British Columbia.

References: Brummitt, R.K. 2001. TDWG – World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions, 2nd Edition

Thuja plicata is an evergreen coniferous tree in the cypress family Cupressaceae, native to western North America. Its common name is western redcedar[2] (western red cedar in the UK),[3] and it is also called Pacific redcedar, giant arborvitae, western arborvitae, just cedar, giant cedar, or shinglewood.[4] It is not a true cedar of the genus Cedrus.

Description

Thuja plicata is a large to very large tree, ranging up to 45 to 70 metres (150 to 230 ft) tall and 2.4 to 7 m (8 to 23 ft) in trunk diameter.[5][6][7] Trees growing in the open may have a crown that reaches the ground, whereas trees densely spaced together will exhibit a crown only at the top, where light can reach the leaves.[8] The trunk swells at the base and has shallow roots.[5] The bark is thin, gray-brown and fissured into vertical bands.[5] As the tree ages, the top is damaged by wind and replaced by inferior branches.[5] The species is long-lived; some trees can live well over a thousand years, with the oldest verified aged 1,460.[6][7]

The foliage forms flat sprays with scale-like leaves in opposite pairs, with successive pairs at 90 degrees to each other. The foliage sprays are green above and green marked with whitish stomatal bands below; they are strongly aromatic, with a scent reminiscent of pineapple when crushed. The individual leaves are 1 to 4 millimetres (1⁄32 to 5⁄32 in) long and 1 to 2 mm (1⁄32 to 3⁄32 in) broad on most foliage sprays, but up to 12 mm (1⁄2 in) long on strong-growing lead shoots.[6][7] The foliage of individual branchlets turns orange-brown before falling off in autumn.[5]

The cones are slender, 10 to 18 mm (3⁄8 to 11⁄16 in) long, and 4 to 5 mm (5⁄32 to 3⁄16 in) broad, with 8 to 12 (rarely 14) thin, overlapping scales. They are green to yellow-green, ripening brown in fall about six months after pollination, and open at maturity to shed the seeds. The seeds are 4 to 5 mm (5⁄32 to 3⁄16 in) long and 1 mm (1⁄32 in) broad, with a narrow papery wing down each side. The pollen cones are 3 to 4 mm (1⁄8 to 5⁄32 in) long, red or purple at first, and shed yellow pollen in spring.[6][7]
Chemistry

The heartwood of western redcedar contains different chemical substances, such as plicatic acid, thujaplicatin methyl ether, hinokitiol and other thujaplicins, β-thujaplicinol, thujic acid, methyl thujate, 1,4-cineole and γ-eudesmol.[9] Plicatic acid is believed to be the main irritant and contact allergen responsible for provoking allergic reactions and asthma exaggeration and leading to occupational asthma in woodworkers that are exposed to western redcedar wood dust.[10] Thujaplicins serve as natural fungicides,[11][12] and thereby prevent the wood from rotting. This effect lasts around a century even after the tree is felled. However, thujaplicins are only found in older trees. Saplings do not produce the chemical, causing them to often develop rot at an early stage, causing some trees to grow with a somewhat hollow trunk, as the tree moves to heal itself as it grows.[13] Due to their fungicidal and anti-browning properties, thujaplicins are used in agriculture for fungal diseases and to prevent post-harvest decay.[14][15] Thujaplicins, as other tropolones, are potent chelating agents and bind divalent metal ions.[16] Basic and animal studies have shown that thujaplicins may have other biological properties, including antibacterial, antiviral and antioxidant activities,[17] however reliable evidence on their effectiveness is still lacking.

The bark is fibrous and longitudinally fissured.

The leaves have white markings on the undersides of the flat foliage sprays.

A shoot with pollen cones.

A shoot with mature seed cones, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest

Western redcedars on Keats Island, British Columbia

Taxonomy and name

Thuja plicata is one of two Thuja species native to North America, the other being Thuja occidentalis. The species name plicata derives from the Latin word plicāre and means 'folded in plaits' or 'braided,' a reference to the pattern of its small leaves.[8]

Most authorities, both in Canada[18][19] and the United States[20][2][21][22] transliterate the English name in two words as 'western redcedar', or occasionally hyphenated as 'western red-cedar',[7] to indicate that it is not a true cedar (Cedrus), but it also appears as 'western red cedar' in some popular works. In the American horticultural trade, it is also known as the giant arborvitae, by comparison with arborvitae for its close relative Thuja occidentalis. Other names include giant redcedar, Pacific redcedar, shinglewood, British Columbia cedar (being the province's official tree),[5] canoe cedar, and red cedar.[6][13] Arborvitae comes from the Latin for 'tree of life'; coincidentally, Native Americans of the West Coast also address the species as "long life maker".[13]

One endonymous name for the tree is the Halkomelem word xepá:y,[23] from the roots xíp, meaning 'scratch' or 'line', and á:y, 'bark';[24] the former root may be in reference to both the lined or "folded/braided" appearance of the bark and the tree's ubiquity in carving and other forms of woodwork.
Distribution and habitat

Thuja plicata is among the most widespread trees in the Pacific Northwest. It is associated with Douglas-fir and western hemlock in most places where it grows. It is found in moist areas, where precipitation exceeds 75 centimetres (30 in) annually, west of the Cascade Range crest – from central South East Alaska (near the village of Kake) to northern California (growing closer to the coast at the north and south extremes) – and inland from central-southeast British Columbia through the Idaho Panhandle.[5] It is usually found from sea level to elevations of 1,100 m (3,600 ft),[5] but grows at altitudes of up to 2,290 m (7,510 ft) at Crater Lake in Oregon[20] and 1,500 m (4,900 ft) in Idaho.[5] In addition to growing in lush forests and mountainsides, western redcedar is also a riparian tree, growing in many forested swamps and streambanks in its range.[25] The tree is shade tolerant and able to reproduce under dense shade.[26]

It has been introduced to other temperate zones, including further north in Alaska, western Europe, Australia (at least as far north as Sydney), New Zealand,[27][28] the eastern United States (at least as far north as Central New York),[citation needed] and higher elevations of Hawaii.[29]

The species is naturalized in Britain.[30]
Ecology
Use by wildlife

Western redcedar foliage, especially that of saplings, is an important food source year-round for browsing ungulates such as Roosevelt elk and black-tailed deer, especially during the winter months when little else is available.[31] The seeds are eaten by birds and rodents.

Western redcedar provides cover for bears, raccoons, skunks, and other animals which nest inside trunk cavities. It is used as a nest tree by cavity-nesting bird species such as yellow-bellied sapsuckers, hairy woodpeckers, tree swallows, chestnut-backed chickadees, and Vaux's swifts.[31]

Thuja plicata is a host to several destructive insect species such as the western cedar borer, cedar bark beetle, gall midge, and conifer seedling weevils.[32][31]
Forest succession

Western redcedar appears in all stages of forest succession, but as it is one of the most shade-tolerant species in the Rocky Mountains and Pacific Northwest it is considered to be a climax species along with western hemlock.[31] It will readily establish and grow in the shade of other, less shade-tolerant species such as red alder, black cottonwood, or Douglas-fir, and prevent seedlings of those species from establishing themselves in its shade. However, western hemlock and Pacific silver fir are more tolerant of shade.[5] Western redcedar can also reproduce vegetatively via layering.[5]
Fire ecology

It is considered to have low to moderate fire resistance, as its thin bark, shallow roots, low dense branching habit and flammable foliage confer little protection. Smaller trees are commonly killed by fire, but larger specimens often survive due to their size if they are not completely girdled. The intervals between fires within western redcedar stands tend to be very long, from 50 up to 350 years or more.[31]
Pathology

Western redcedar shows susceptibility of varying degrees to the following soil pathogens: Armillaria ostoyae, Fomitopsis pinicola, Heterobasidion annosum, Phaeolus schweinitzii, Phellinus weirii, Rhizinia undulata, and Postia sericeomollis.[33]

While western redcedar is a host to P. weirii, the fungus which causes the disease laminated root rot, redcedar is rated as resistant while other conifers are rated as highly susceptible or susceptible.[34] Instead of laminated root rot, P. weirii in western redcedar expresses as a butt rot that can extend 2–3 m up the boles of living trees with the most extreme cases reaching 10 m. While the heart rot caused by the redcedar form of P. weirii does not kill the tree outright, it does severely weaken the lower portion of the bole which makes the tree highly susceptible to stem breakage.

P. sericeomollis is responsible for brown cubical butt and pocket rot of cedar. It is the second-most common cause of decay in western redcedar following P. weirii. Rather than forming a single column of decay in the heartwood, though, P. sericeomollis tends to cause rings or pockets of decay in the lower bole.[35]

In addition to P. weirii, western redcedar is also less susceptible to H. annosum and A. ostoyae than other conifer species.[36] Studies have found that western redcedar produces a phytochemical called thujaplicin which has been credited with granting the species its natural resistance to fungal attacks.[12] Because of these natural defenses, it has been suggested that western redcedar may serve as a suitable alternative to other conifers when regenerating a site affected by these pathogens.[37]
Cultivation

Like its relative Thuja occidentalis and many other conifer species, Thuja plicata is grown as an ornamental tree, and for screens and hedges, throughout the world in gardens and parks. A wide variety of forms, sizes, and colours is available.[38]

Cultivars

The following cultivars have gained the Royal Horticultural Society's Award of Garden Merit:

'Atrovirens'[39]
'Aurea'[40]
'Stoneham Gold'[41]
'Whipcord'[42]
'Zebrina'[43]

Uses
In indigenous societies
Klallam people and canoe, ca. 1914

Western redcedar has an extensive history of use by Native Americans of coastal Oregon to southeast Alaska. Some northwest coast tribes refer to themselves as "people of the redcedar" because of their extensive dependence on the tree for basic materials. The wood has been used for constructing housing and totem poles, and crafted into many objects, including masks, utensils, boxes, boards, instruments, canoes, vessels, houses, and ceremonial objects. Western redcedar is also associated with a long tradition of curing and cooking fish over the open fire. Roots and bark are used for baskets, bowls, ropes, clothing, blankets, and rings.[44][45]

A huge number of archaeological finds point to the continuous use of redcedar wood in native societies. Woodworking tools dating between 8,000 and 5,000 years ago, such as carved antlers, were discovered in shell middens at the Glenrose site, near Vancouver, British Columbia.[46] In Yuquot, on the west coast of Vancouver Island, tools dating 4,000 to 3,000 years old have been found.[46] The Musqueam site, also near Vancouver, yielded bark baskets woven in five different styles, along with ropes and ships dated to 3,000 years ago. At Pitt River, adzes and baskets were dated around 2,900 years ago. Wooden artifacts 1000 years old were unearthed on the east coast of Vancouver Island.[47]

Red cedar was used extensively wherever it was found along the northwest coast (British Columbia, Washington state, parts of Alaska). Evidence of this use is found in CMTs (Culturally Modified Trees) that are found throughout the coast. When First Nations people removed the bark from cedars, it left a scar – which is considered a CMT. Other types of harvest (for planks, tinder, and other uses) leave different types of evidence of cultural modification.

A legend amongst the Coast Salish peoples describes the origins of the western redcedar. In this legend, there was a generous man who gave the people whatever they needed. When the Great Spirit saw this, he declared that when the generous man died, a great redcedar tree will grow where he is buried, and that the cedar will be useful to all the people, providing its roots for baskets, bark for clothing, and wood for shelter.[46]
Tools

The wood was worked primarily with the adze, which was preferred over all other tools, even ones introduced by Europeans. Alexander Walker, an ensign on the fur trade ship Captain Cook, reported that the indigenous peoples used an elbow adze, which they valued over tools brought by the Europeans, such as the saw or the axe, going so far as to modify traded tools back into an adze. Tools were generally made from stone, bone, obsidian, or a harder wood such as hemlock. A variety of hand mauls, wedges, chisels, and knives are also used.

Excavations done at Ozette, Washington, turned up iron tools nearly 800 years old, far before European contact. When James Cook passed the area, he observed that almost all tools were made of iron.[48] There has been speculation on the origin of these iron tools. Some theories include shipwrecks from East Asia or possible contact with iron-using cultures from Siberia, as hinted in the more advanced woodworking found in northern tribes such as the Tlingit.[48][49][50][51]
Wood
A totem pole outside a six-post house at the University of British Columbia

Harvesting redcedars required some ceremony and included propitiation of the tree's spirits as well as those of the surrounding trees. In particular, many people specifically requested the tree and its brethren not to fall or drop heavy branches on the harvester,[52] a situation which is mentioned in a number of different stories of people who were not sufficiently careful. Some professional loggers of Native American descent have mentioned that they offer quiet or silent propitiations to trees which they fell, following in this tradition.

Felling of large trees such as redcedar before the introduction of steel tools was a complex and time-consuming art. Typically the bark was removed around the base of the tree above the buttresses. Then some amount of cutting and splitting with stone adzes and mauls would be done, creating a wide triangular cut. The area above and below the cut would be covered with a mixture of wet moss and clay as a firebreak. Then the cut would be packed with tinder and small kindling and slowly burned. The process of cutting and burning would alternate until the tree was mostly penetrated through, and then careful tending of the fire would fell the tree in the best direction for handling. This process could take many days. Constant rotation of workers was involved to keep the fires burning through night and day, often in a remote and forbidding location.[53]

Once the tree was felled, the work had only just begun, as it then had to be stripped and dragged down to shore. If the tree was to become canoes, then it would often be divided into sections and worked into rough canoe shapes before transport. If it were to be used for a totem pole or building materials, it would be towed in the round to the village.[54] Many trees are still felled in this traditional manner for use as totem poles and canoes, particularly by artists who feel that using modern tools is detrimental to the traditional spirit of the art. Non-traditionalists simply buy redcedar logs or lumber at mills or lumber yards, a practice that is commonly followed by most working in smaller sizes such as for masks and staves.

Because felling required such an extraordinary amount of work, if only planks for housing were needed, these would be split from the living tree. The bark was stripped and saved, and two cuts were made at the ends of the planking. Then wedges would be pounded in along the sides and the planks slowly split off the side of the tree.[55] Trees which have been so harvested are still visible in some places in the rainforest, with obvious chunks taken off of their sides. Such trees usually continue to grow perfectly well, since redcedar wood is resistant to decay. Planks are straightened by a variety of methods, including weighing them down with stones, lashing them together with rope, or forcing them between a line of stakes.[56]
Illustration of women pulling bark from a tree, from Indian Legends of Vancouver Island by Alfred Carmichael

Redcedar wood is used to make huge monoxyla canoes in which the men went out to high sea to harpoon whales and conduct trade.[57] One of those canoes, a 12-metre (38 ft) craft dug out about a century ago, was bought in 1901 by Captain John Voss, an adventurer. He gave her the name of Tilikum ('Relative' in Chinook jargon), rigged her, and led her in a hectic three-year voyage from British Columbia to London.[58]

Redcedar branches are very flexible and have good tensile strength. They were stripped and used as strong cords for fishing line, nets,[5] rope cores, twine, and other purposes where bark cord was not strong enough or might fray. Both the branches and bark rope have been replaced by modern fiber and nylon cordage among the aboriginal northwest coast peoples, though the bark is still in use for the other purposes mentioned above.
Bark

At the right time of year, the bark is easily removed from live trees in long strips. It is harvested for use in making mats, rope and cordage, basketry, rain hats, clothing, and other soft goods. The harvesting of bark must be done with care, as stripping too much bark will kill the tree. To prevent this, the harvester usually only harvests from trees which have not been stripped before.[59] After harvesting, the tree is not used for bark again, although it may later be felled for wood. Stripping bark is usually started with a series of cuts at the base of the tree above any buttresses, after which the bark is peeled upwards. To remove bark high up, a pair of platforms strung on rope around the tree are used and the harvester climbs by alternating between them for support. Since redcedars lose their lower branches as all tall trees do in the rainforest, the harvester may climb 10 m (33 ft) or more into the tree by this method. The harvested bark is folded and carried in backpacks.[60] It can be stored for quite some time as mold does not grow on it, and is moistened before unfolding and working. It is then split lengthwise into the required width and woven or twisted into shape. Bark harvesting was mostly done by women, despite the danger of climbing ten meters in the air, because they were the primary makers of bark goods.[61]

Today bark rope making is a lost art in many communities, although it is still practiced for decoration or art in a few places. Other uses of bark are still common for artistic or practical purposes. In recent years there has been a revival of cedar weaving in some communities, and along with it, new forms of cedar bark products. For example, in some recent weddings cedar roses are used to decorate the tables.
Timber
Canadian western redcedar cowl in the National Assembly for Wales

The soft red-brown timber has a tight, straight grain and few knots. It is valued for its distinct appearance, aroma, and its high natural resistance to decay, being extensively used for outdoor construction in the form of posts, decking, shingles, and siding.[62] It is commonly used for the framing and longwood in lightweight sail boats and kayaks. In larger boats it is often used in sandwich construction between two layers of epoxy resin and/or fibreglass or similar products. Due to its light weight – 390 to 400 kg/m3 (24 to 25 lb/cu ft) dried – it is about 30% lighter than common boat building woods, such as mahogany. For its weight it is quite strong but can be brittle. It glues well with epoxy resin or resorcinol adhesive.

Its light weight, strength, and dark, warm sound make it a popular choice for guitar soundboards, particularly among European guitar builders such as Lowden and Furch.

Western redcedar wood is export-restricted in the United States.[63] The tree is highly allergenic and woodworkers or loggers who work with it may have adverse reactions, including the development of occupational asthma, exacerbation of existing asthma, reduction of lung function, and eye irritation. Approximately 5% of workers are allergic to western redcedar. The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration has set a permissible exposure limit for red cedar dust of 2.5 mg/m3 as a time-weighted average over eight hours.[64]
Essential oil

The essential oil of western redcedar leaves contains natural compounds, such as α-thujone, β-thujone, fenchone, sabinene, terpinen-4-ol and beyerene,[65] which have also been isolated from different other essential oils. Some of these substances are aroma compounds and are used in perfumery.[66] Thujones are GABAA receptor competitive antagonists however because of their high toxicity and convulsive activity they do not have any pharmacological use.[67]
Other uses

It is also widely used throughout Europe and America for making beehive components.

Its bark has been studied for applications in polyurethane.[68]
Notable specimens
The Quinault Lake Redcedar was the world's largest western redcedar.

The largest living specimen is the Cheewhat Giant, in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve on Vancouver Island, at 450 cubic metres (15,870 cu ft).[69] The tallest known individual is the Willaby Creek Tree south of Lake Quinault, 59 m (195 ft) in height.[70] The 'Quinault Lake Redcedar' was the largest known western redcedar in the world, with a wood volume of 500 m3 (17,650 cu ft). Located near the northwest shore of Lake Quinault north of Aberdeen, Washington, about 34 kilometres (21 mi) from the Pacific Ocean, it was one-third the volume of the largest known tree, a giant sequoia named 'General Sherman'. The Quinault Lake Redcedar was 53 m (174 ft) tall with a diameter of 5.9 m (19.5 ft) at breast height. The Quinault Lake Redcedar was destroyed by a series of storms in 2014 and 2016 and is now only a glorified stump.[6][71] The fifth-largest known was the Kalaloch Cedar in Olympic National Park, at 350 m3 (12,370 cu ft),[72] until it was destroyed by a storm in March 2014.[73]

A redcedar over 71 m (233 ft) tall, 4.5 m (15 ft) in diameter, and over 700 years old stood in Cathedral Grove on Vancouver Island before it was set on fire and destroyed by vandals in 1972. That tree now lies in "Giant's Grave", a self-dug 'grave' created by the force of its own impact.[74] A specimen measuring 5.5 m (18 ft) diameter and 54 m (177 ft) tall on the Giant Red Cedar National Recreation Trail in the Idaho Panhandle National Forests is designated the "Champion Tree of Idaho".[75]
See also

Cedar wood
List of superlative trees

References

Farjon, A. (2013). "Thuja plicata". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013: e.T42263A2968155. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42263A2968155.en. Retrieved 19 November 2021.
USDA, NRCS (n.d.). "Thuja plicata". The PLANTS Database (plants.usda.gov). Greensboro, North Carolina: National Plant Data Team. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
"Thuja plicata". RHS. Retrieved 7 September 2021.
"Thuja plicata". Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Agricultural Research Service (ARS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Retrieved 11 December 2017.
Arno, Stephen F.; Hammerly, Ramona P. (2020) [1977]. Northwest Trees: Identifying & Understanding the Region's Native Trees (field guide ed.). Seattle: Mountaineers Books. pp. 155–162. ISBN 1-68051-329-X. OCLC 1141235469.
Earle, Christopher J., ed. (2018). "Thuja plicata". The Gymnosperm Database.
Farjon 2005.
Stewart 1984, p. 24.
Daniels, C. R.; Russell, J. H. (1 May 2007). "Analysis of Western Redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn) Heartwood Components by HPLC as a Possible Screening Tool for Trees with Enhanced Natural Durability". Journal of Chromatographic Science. 45 (5): 281–285. doi:10.1093/chromsci/45.5.281. PMID 17555638.
Chan-Yeung, Moira (January 1994). "Mechanism of occupational asthma due to Western red cedar (Thuja plicata)". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 25 (1): 13–18. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700250106. PMID 8116639.
Gardner 1963, p. 21.
Chedgy, Lim & Breuil 2009.
Stewart 1984, p. 22.
Morita, Yasuhiro; Matsumura, Eiko; Okabe, Toshihiro; Fukui, Toru; Shibata, Mitsunobu; Sugiura, Masaaki; Ohe, Tatsuhiko; Tsujibo, Hiroshi; Ishida, Nakao; Inamori, Yoshihiko (2004). "Biological Activity of α-Thujaplicin, the Isomer of Hinokitiol". Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 27 (6): 899–902. doi:10.1248/bpb.27.899. PMID 15187442.
Vanitha, Thiraviam; Thammawong, Manasikan; Umehara, Hitomi; Nakamura, Nobutaka; Shiina, Takeo (December 2019). "Effect of hinokitiol impregnated sheets on shelf life and quality of "KEK‐1" tomatoes during storage". Packaging Technology and Science. 32 (12): 641–648. doi:10.1002/pts.2479. S2CID 202995336.
Pietra, Francesco (August 1973). "Seven-membered conjugated carbo- and heterocyclic compounds and their homoconjugated analogs and metal complexes. Synthesis, biosynthesis, structure, and reactivity". Chemical Reviews. 73 (4): 293–364. doi:10.1021/cr60284a002.
Saniewski, Marian; Horbowicz, Marcin; Kanlayanarat, Sirichai (10 September 2014). "The Biological Activities of Troponoids and Their Use in Agriculture A Review". Journal of Horticultural Research. 22 (1): 5–19. doi:10.2478/johr-2014-0001. S2CID 33834249.
British Columbia Forests & Range Tree Book: Thuja plicata
British Columbia Tree Species Compendium Western redcedar
Minore, Don (1990). "Thuja plicata". In Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H. (eds.). Conifers. Silvics of North America. Washington, D.C.: United States Forest Service (USFS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Vol. 1 – via Southern Research Station.
Tesky, Julie L. (1992). "Thuja plicata". Fire Effects Information System (FEIS). US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service (USFS), Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.
Flora of North America.
Dictionary of Upriver Halkomelem, Volume II pp. 1605. Galloway, Brent Douglas
Dictionary of Upriver Halkomelem, Volume I pp. 996. Galloway, Brent Douglas
Stewart 1984, p. 21.
Priestman, Lauren. "Plant Description: Thuja plicata/Western Red Cedar". Northern Rockies Natural History Guide. University of Montana, Missoula. Retrieved 21 July 2013.
Flora of North America, p. 411.
Hill 1985, p. 103.
Skolmen, Roger G. (1974). "Natural Durability of Some Woods Used in Hawaii". Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved 21 July 2013.
"Thuja plicata". Interactive Flora of Northwest Europe.
"Thuja plicata". United States Forest Service. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
Patterson, Patricia A. (1985). Field Guide to the Forest Plants of Northern Idaho (PDF). United States Forest Service. p. 25.
Allen, Eric Andrew, 1955- (1996). Common tree diseases of British Columbia. Morrison, D. J., Wallis, G. W., Pacific Forestry Centre. Victoria, B.C.: Pacific Forestry Centre. ISBN 0-662-24870-8. OCLC 35976392.
Thies, Walter G.; Sturrock, Rona N. (1995). "Laminated root rot in western North America". Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-349. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 32 P. In Cooperation with: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. 349. doi:10.2737/PNW-GTR-349. hdl:2027/umn.31951d02889118b.
Buckland, D. C. (1 October 1946). "Investigations of decay in western red cedar in british columbia". Canadian Journal of Research. 24c (5): 158–181. doi:10.1139/cjr46c-018. ISSN 1923-4287.
Wood, David L. (2003). Pests of the Native California Conifers. Koerber, Thomas W., Scharpf, Robert F., Storer, Andrew J. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-93637-9. OCLC 773564950.
Minore, D. (1990). Western redcedar. In Silvics of North America vol.1: Conifers. (1990). Burns, R.M. & Honkala, B.H. (tech. Coords). Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service: Washington DC.
Bitner 2007, p. 424.
"RHS Plant Selector - Thuja plicata 'Atrovirens'". RHS. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
"RHS Plant Selector - Thuja plicata 'Aurea'". RHS. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
"RHS Plant Selector - Thuja plicata 'Stoneham Gold'". RHS. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
"RHS Plantfinder - Thuja plicata 'Whipcord'". Retrieved 23 December 2018.
"Thuja plicata 'Zebrina'". RHS. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
Stewart 1984, pp. 17–19.
Van Pelt 2001, p. 30.
Stewart 1984, p. 27.
Stewart 1984, p. 26.
Stewart 1984, p. 36.
Pritzker 1998, p. 292.
Miller 2008, p. 67.
DeCapua, pp. 16–20
Stewart 1984, p. 39.
Stewart 1984, pp. 37–38.
Stewart 1984, p. 40.
Stewart 1984, p. 42.
Stewart 1984, p. 43.
McNeese 2002, p. 43.
Dill 2006, pp. 127–128.
Stewart 1984, p. 116.
Stewart 1984, p. 115.
Stewart 1984, p. 113.
Chase, Jeri (Fall 2008). "Western Redcedar, "Tree of Life"" (PDF). Forests for Oregon. Oregon Department of Forestry. pp. 18–19. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
"5 Things You Would Never Expect Need an Export License". The Export Compliance Journal. 6 June 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
"Wood Dust". OSHA/NIOSH. 28 September 2011.
Lis, Anna; Swaczyna, Agata; Krajewska, Agnieszka; Mellor, Karolina (July 2019). "Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils From Twigs, Leaves, and Cones of Thuja plicata and Its Cultivar Varieties "Fastigiata", "Kornik," and "Zebrina"". Natural Product Communications. 14 (7): 1934578X1986290. doi:10.1177/1934578X19862904. S2CID 202164043.
Fahlbusch, Karl-Georg; Hammerschmidt, Franz-Josef; Panten, Johannes; Pickenhagen, Wilhelm; Schatkowski, Dietmar; Bauer, Kurt; Garbe, Dorothea; Surburg, Horst (15 January 2003). "Flavors and Fragrances". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry: a11_141. doi:10.1002/14356007.a11_141. ISBN 3527306730.
Olsen, R. W. (25 April 2000). "Absinthe and gamma -aminobutyric acid receptors". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97 (9): 4417–4418. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.4417O. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4417. PMC 34311. PMID 10781032.
Chen, Heyu. "The Utilization of Bark and Bark Components from Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) for Polyurethane Applications" (PDF).
Van Pelt 2001, p. 34.
Van Pelt 2001, p. 36.
Van Pelt 2001, p. 32.
Van Pelt 2001, p. 37.
Exotic Hikes, "Olympic National Park’s Kalaloch Cedar Destroyed by Storm"
Picture of the Cathedral Grove stump.

"Idaho Giant Red Cedar - NRT Database".

Works cited

Bitner, Richard L. (2007). Conifers for Gardens: an Illustrated Encyclopedia. United Kingdom: Timber Press. ISBN 978-0-88192-830-3.
Chedgy, Russell J.; Lim, Young Woon & Breuil, Colette (2009). "Effects of leaching on fungal growth and decay of western redcedar (Thuja plicata)". Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 55 (5): 578–586. doi:10.1139/W08-161. PMID 19483786.
DeCapua, Sarah (2010). The Tlingit. First Americans. Tarrytown, New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark. ISBN 978-0-7614-4135-9.
Dill, J. Gregory (2006). Myth, Fact, And Navigators' Secrets: Incredible Tales of the Sea And Sailors. Guilford, Connecticut: The Lyons Press. ISBN 1-59228-879-0.
Farjon, A. (2005). Monograph of Cupressaceae and Sciadopitys. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. ISBN 1-84246-068-4.
Chambers, Kenton L. (1993). "Thuja plicata". In Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.). Flora of North America North of Mexico (FNA). Vol. 2. New York and Oxford – via eFloras.org, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA.
Gardner, J. A. F. (1963). The Chemistry and Utilization of Western Red Cedar. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of Forestry. OCLC 65814710.
Hill, Anthony (1985). Antique Furniture in Australia. Victoria, British Columbia: Viking Press. ISBN 0-670-80319-7.
McNeese, Tim (2002). Early North America. St. Louis, Missouri: Milliken Publishing. ISBN 0-7877-0527-6.
Miller, Mike (2008). Alaska's Southeast: Touring the Inside Passage (11th ed.). Guilford, Connecticut: Globe Pequot Press. ISBN 978-0-7627-4535-7. ISSN 1545-1941.
Pritzker, Barry M. (1998). Native Americans: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Peoples. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 0-87436-836-7.
Stewart, Hilary (1984). Cedar: Tree of Life to the Northwest Coast Indians. Vancouver, British Columbia: Douglas & McIntyre. ISBN 0-88894-437-3.
Van Pelt, Robert (2001). Forest Giants of the Pacific Coast. Global Forest Society and University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-98140-7.
Zsolt Debreczy; Istvan Racz (2012). Kathy Musial (ed.). Conifers Around the World (1st ed.). DendroPress. p. 1089. ISBN 978-963-219-061-7.