Lycopodiopsida

Superregnum: Eukaryota
Regnum: Plantae
Divisio: Tracheophyta
Divisio: Lycopodiophyta
Classis: Lycopodiopsida
Subclasses: †Asteroxylidae – †Protolepidodendridae – Isoëtidae – Lycopodiidae

Unplaced genera (2): †Changxingia – †Nothostigma

Name

Lycopodiopsida Bartl., Ord. Nat. Pl.: 14, 19. 1830. (as “Lycopodineae”, orth. emend.)
Synonyms

Homotypic
Lycopsida, orth. var.
Heterotypic
Aglossopsida
Eligulatae Bessey, Nebraska Univ. Stud. 7: 320 (1907).

References
Primary references

Bartling, F.G. 1830. Ordines Naturales Plantarum eorumque characteres et affinitates adjecta generum enumeratione. [I]–V, [1]–498 pp. Gottingae. Biblioteca Digital. Reference page.
Bessey, C.E. 1907. A synopsis of plant phyla. Nebraska University Studies 7(4): 275–373. BHL Reference page.

Additional references

Doweld, A.B. 2001. Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Tentamen systematis plantarum vascularium (Tracheophyta) [Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Опыт системы сосудистых растений]. LXXX + 110 pp. Moscow: Geos. ISBN 5-89118-283-1. Фундаментальная электронная библиотека «Флора и фауна» DJVU Google Books Open access Reference page.
Novikoff A. & Barabasz-Krasny B. 2015. System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff, A. & Barabasz-Krasny, B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine.Online version

Vernacular names
Deutsch: Bärlapppflanzen
English: Clubmosses
македонски: Црвоточни
norsk: Kråkefotplanter
polski: Widłaki Jednakozarodnikowe, Widłaki Właściwe, Widłakowe Właściwe

Lycopodiopsida is a class of vascular plants also known as lycopods or lycophytes. Members of the class are also called clubmosses, firmosses, spikemosses and quillworts. They have dichotomously branching stems bearing simple leaves called microphylls and reproduce by means of spores borne in sporangia on the sides of the stems at the bases of the leaves. Although living species are small, during the Carboniferous, extinct tree-like forms (Lepidodendrales) formed huge forests that dominated the landscape and contributed to coal deposits.

The nomenclature and classification of plants with microphylls varies substantially among authors. A consensus classification for extant (living) species was produced in 2016 by the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group (PPG I), which places them all in the class Lycopodiopsida, which includes the classes Isoetopsida and Selaginellopsida used in other systems. (See Table 2.) Alternative classification systems have used ranks from division (phylum) to subclass. In the PPG I system, the class is divided into three orders, Lycopodiales, Isoetales and Selaginellales.
Characteristics

Club-mosses (Lycopodiales) are homosporous, but the genera Selaginella (spikemosses) and Isoetes (quillworts) are heterosporous, with female spores larger than the male.[1] As a result of fertilisation, the female gametophyte produces sporophytes. A few species of Selaginella such as S. apoda and S. rupestris are also viviparous; the gametophyte develops on the mother plant, and only when the sporophyte's primary shoot and root is developed enough for independence is the new plant dropped to the ground.[2] Many club-moss gametophytes are mycoheterotrophic and long-lived, residing underground for several years before emerging from the ground and progressing to the sporophyte stage.[3]

Lycopodiaceae and spikemosses (Selaginella) are the only vascular plants with biflagellate sperm, an ancestral trait in land plants otherwise only seen in bryophytes. The only exceptions are Isoetes and Phylloglossum, which independently has evolved multiflagellated sperm cells with approximately 20 flagella[4][5] (sperm flagella in other vascular plants can count at least thousand, but is completely absent in seed plants except for Ginkgo and cycads).[6] Because only two flagella puts a size limit on the genome, we find the largest known genomes in the clade in Isoetes, as multiflagellated sperm is not exposed for the same selection pressure as biflagellate sperm in regard of size.[7]
Taxonomy
Phylogeny

The extant lycophytes are vascular plants (tracheophytes) with microphyllous leaves, distinguishing them from the euphyllophytes (plants with megaphyllous leaves). The sister group of the extant lycophytes and their closest extinct relatives are generally believed to be the zosterophylls, a paraphyletic or plesion group. Ignoring some smaller extinct taxa, the evolutionary relationships are as shown below.[8][9][10]
tracheophytes
lycophytes
†zosterophylls

 (multiple branches, incertae sedis)
lycopodiopsida

 living lycophytes and
 their extinct close relatives
 (broadly defined) 
euphyllophytes

 ferns & horsetails

 spermatophytes
 (seed plants)
 (vascular plants) 

As of 2019, there was broad agreement, supported by both molecular and morphological evidence, that the extant lycophytes fell into three groups, treated as orders in PPG I, and that these, both together and individually, are monophyletic, being related as shown in the cladogram below:[10]
 extant lycophytes 

 lycopodiales 

 Isoetales

 Selaginellales
Classification

The rank and name used for the taxon holding the extant lycophytes (and their closest extinct relatives) varies widely. Table 1 below shows some of the highest ranks that have been used. Systems may use taxa at a rank lower than the highest given in the table with the same circumscription; for example, a system that uses Lycopodiophyta as the highest ranked taxon may place all of its members in a single subclass.
Table 1: Alternative highest ranks used which include only extant species and their closest relatives Highest rank Name Example sources
Division (phylum) Lycophyta Taylor et al. (2009),[11] Mauseth (2014)[9]
Division (phylum) Lycopodiophyta Niklas (2016)[12]
Subdivision (subphylum) Lycopodiophytina Ruggiero et al. (2015)[13]
Class Lycopsida Kenrick & Crane (1997)[8][14]
Class Lycopodiopsida PPG I (2016)[10]
Subclass Lycopodiidae Chase & Reveal (2009)[15]

Some systems use a higher rank for a more broadly defined taxon of lycophytes that includes some extinct groups more distantly related to extant lycophytes, such as the zosterophylls. For example, Kenrick & Crane (1997) use the subdivision Lycophytina for this purpose, with all extant lycophytes falling within the class Lycopsida.[8] Other sources exclude the zosterophylls from any "lycophyte" taxon.[11]

In the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group classification of 2016 (PPG I), the three orders are placed in a single class, Lycopodiopsida, holding all extant lycophyte species. Older systems have used either three classes, one for each order, or two classes, recognizing the closer relationship between Isoetales and Selaginellales. In these cases, a higher ranked taxon is needed to contain the classes (see Table 1). As Table 2 shows, the names "Lycopodiopsida" and "Isoetopsida" are both ambiguous.
Table 2: Alternative arrangements of the orders of extant lycophytes into classes Order 3 classes
e.g. IUCN Red List, 2004[16] 2 classes
e.g. Yatsentyuk et al. (2001)[17] 1 class
PPG I[10]
Lycopodiales Lycopodiopsida Lycopodiopsida Lycopodiopsida
Isoetales Isoetopsida Isoetopsida
Selaginellales Sellaginellopsida
Subdivisions

The PPG I system divides up the extant lycophytes as shown below.

Class Lycopodiopsida Bartl. (3 orders)

Order Lycopodiales DC. ex Bercht. & J.Presl (1 extant family)

Family Lycopodiaceae P.Beauv. (16 extant genera)

Order Isoetales Prantl (1 extant family)

Family Isoetaceae Dumort. (1 extant genus)

Order Selaginellales Prantl (1 extant family)

Family Selaginellaceae Willk (1 extant genus)

Some extinct groups, such as zosterophylls, fall outside the limits of the taxon as defined by the classifications in Table 1 above. However, other extinct groups fall within some circumscriptions of this taxon. Taylor et al. (2009) and Mauseth (2014) include a number of extinct orders in their division (phylum) Lycophyta, although they differ on the placement of some genera.[11][9] The orders included by Taylor et al. are:[11]

Order †Drepanophycales (including Baragwanathia, Drepanophycus and Asteroxylon)
Order †Protolepidodendrales
Order †Lepidodendrales
Order †Pleuromeiales

Mauseth uses the order †Asteroxylales, placing Baragwanathia in the Protolepidodendrales.[9]

The relationship between some of these extinct groups and the extant ones was investigated by Kenrick and Crane in 1997. When the genera they used are assigned to orders, their suggested relationship is:[18]

†Drepanophycales (†Asteroxylon, †Baragwanathia, †Drepanophycus)

Lycopodiales

†Protolepidodendrales (†Leclercqia, †Minarodendron)

Selaginellales (Selaginella, including subg. Stachygynandrum and subg. Tetragonostachys)

Isoetales (Isoetes)

†Lepidodendrales (†Paralycopodites)
Evolution
Artist's impression of a Lepidodendron
External impression of Lepidodendron from the Upper Carboniferous of Ohio
Axis (branch) from Archaeosigillaria or related lycopod from the Middle Devonian of Wisconsin

The Lycopodiopsida are distinguished from other vascular plants by the possession of microphylls and by their sporangia, which are lateral as opposed to terminal and which open (dehisce) transversely rather than longitudinally. In some groups, the sporangia are borne on sporophylls that are clustered into strobili. Phylogenetic analysis shows the group branching off at the base of the evolution of vascular plants and they have a long evolutionary history. Fossils are abundant worldwide, especially in coal deposits. Fossils that can be ascribed to the Lycopodiopsida first appear in the Silurian period, along with a number of other vascular plants. The Silurian Baragwanathia longifolia is one of the earliest identifiable species. Lycopodolica is another Silurian genus which appears to be an early member of this group.[19] The group evolved roots independently from the rest of the vascular plants.[20][21]

From the Devonian onwards, some species grew large and tree-like. Devonian fossil lycopsids from Svalbard, growing in equatorial regions, raise the possibility that they drew down enough carbon dioxide to change the Earth's climate significantly.[22] During the Carboniferous, tree-like plants (such as Lepidodendron, Sigillaria, and other extinct genera of the order Lepidodendrales) formed huge forests that dominated the landscape. Unlike modern trees, leaves grew out of the entire surface of the trunk and branches, but fell off as the plant grew, leaving only a small cluster of leaves at the top. The lycopsids had distinctive features such as Lepidodendron lycophytes, which were marked with diamond-shaped scars where they once had leaves. Quillworts (order Isoetales) and Selaginella are considered their closest extant relatives and share some unusual features with these fossil lycopods, including the development of both bark, cambium and wood, a modified shoot system acting as roots, bipolar and secondary growth, and an upright stance.[2][23] The remains of Lepidodendron lycopods formed many fossil coal deposits. In Fossil Grove, Victoria Park, Glasgow, Scotland, fossilized lycophytes can be found in sandstone.

The Lycopodiopsida had their maximum diversity in the Pennsylvanian (Upper Carboniferous), particularly tree-like Lepidodendron and Sigillaria that dominated tropical wetlands. The complex ecology of these tropical rainforests collapsed during the Middle Pennsylvanian due to a change in climate.[24] In Euramerica, tree-like species apparently became extinct in the Late Pennsylvanian, as a result of a transition to a much drier climate, giving way to conifers, ferns and horsetails. In Cathaysia (now South China), tree-like species survived into the Permian. Nevertheless, lycopodiopsids are rare in the Lopingian (latest Permian), but regained dominance in the Induan (earliest Triassic), particularly Pleuromeia. After the worldwide Permian–Triassic extinction event, members of this group pioneered the repopulation of habitats as opportunistic plants. The heterogeneity of the terrestrial plant communities increased markedly during the Middle Triassic when plant groups like horsetails, ferns, pteridosperms, cycads, ginkgos and conifers resurfaced and diversified quickly.[25]
Microbial associations

Lycophytes form associations with microbes such as fungi and bacteria, including arbuscular mycorrhizal and endophytic associations.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations have been characterized in all stages of the lycophyte lifecycle: mycoheterotrophic gametophyte, photosynthetic surface-dwelling gametophyte, young sporophyte, and mature sporophyte.[3] Arbuscular mycorrhizae have been found in Selaginella spp. roots and vesicles.[26]

During the mycoheterotrophic gametophyte lifecycle stage, lycophytes gain all of their carbon from subterranean glomalean fungi. In other plant taxa, glomalean networks transfer carbon from neighboring plants to mycoheterotrophic gametophytes. Something similar could be occurring in Huperzia hypogeae gametophytes which associate with the same glomalean phenotypes as nearby Huperzia hypogeae sporophytes.[3]

Fungal endophytes have been found in many species of lycophyte, however the function of these endophytes in host plant biology is not known. Endophytes of other plant taxa perform roles such as improving plant competitive fitness, conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, promoting plant growth through phytohormone production or production of limiting nutrients.[27] However, some endophytic fungi in lycophytes do produce medically relevant compounds. Shiraia sp Slf14 is an endophytic fungus present in Huperzia serrata that produces Huperzine A, a biomedical compound which has been approved as a drug in China and a dietary supplement in the U.S. to treat Alzheimer's Disease.[28] This fungal endophyte can be cultivated much more easily and on a much larger scale than H. serrata itself which could increase the availability of Huperzine A as a medicine.
Uses

The spores of lycopods are highly flammable and so have been used in fireworks.[29] Lycopodium powder, the dried spores of the common clubmoss, was used in Victorian theater to produce flame-effects. A blown cloud of spores burned rapidly and brightly, but with little heat. (It was considered safe by the standards of the time.)[citation needed]
References

Leonard, Janet L. (21 May 2019). Transitions Between Sexual Systems: Understanding the Mechanisms of, and Pathways Between, Dioecy, Hermaphroditism and Other Sexual Systems. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-94139-4.
Awasthi, D.K. (2009). "7.21". Cryptogams (Algae, Bryophyta and Pterldophyta). Meerut, India: Krishna Prakashan Media. Retrieved 2019-10-21.
Winther, J.L. & Friedman, W.E. (2008). "Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in Lycopodicaceae". New Phytologist. 177 (3): 790–801. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02276.x. PMID 17971070.
Renzaglia, Karen S.; Garbary, David J. (2001). "Motile Gametes of Land Plants: Diversity, Development, and Evolution". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 20 (2): 107–213. Bibcode:2001CRvPS..20..107R. doi:10.1080/20013591099209.
An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny
Alvarez, L. (2017). "The tailored sperm cell". Journal of Plant Research. 130 (3): 455–464. Bibcode:2017JPlR..130..455A. doi:10.1007/s10265-017-0936-2. PMC 5406480. PMID 28357612.
Greilhuber, Johann; Dolezel, Jaroslav; Wendel, Jonathan (13 November 2012). Plant Genome Diversity Volume 2: Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes. Springer. ISBN 978-3-7091-1160-4.
Kenrick, Paul & Crane, Peter R. (1997a). The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants: A Cladistic Study. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. ISBN 978-1-56098-730-7.
Mauseth, James D. (2014). Botany : An introduction to Plant Biology (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN 978-1-4496-6580-7.
PPG I (2016). "A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 54 (6): 563–603. doi:10.1111/jse.12229. S2CID 39980610.
Taylor, T.N.; Taylor, E.L. & Krings, M. (2009). Paleobotany : The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants (2nd ed.). Amsterdam; Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373972-8.
Niklas, Karl J. (2016). "Table 0.1". Plant Evolution: An Introduction to the History of Life. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-34214-6. Retrieved 2019-10-22.
Ruggiero, Michael A.; Gordon, Dennis P.; Orrell, Thomas M.; Bailly, Nicolas; Bourgoin, Thierry; Brusca, Richard C.; Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Guiry, Michael D. & Kirk, Paul M. (2015). "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms". PLOS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965. PMID 25923521.
Kenrick, Paul & Crane, Peter R. (1997b). "The origin and early evolution of plants on land". Nature. 389 (6646): 33–39. Bibcode:1997Natur.389...33K. doi:10.1038/37918. S2CID 3866183.
Chase, Mark W. & Reveal, James L. (2009). "A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 122–127. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x.
Baillie, Jonathan; Hilton-Taylor, Craig & Stuart, S.N. (2004). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: A Global Species Assessment. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN—The World Conservation Union. p. 27. ISBN 978-2-8317-0826-3. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
Yatsentyuk, S.P.; Valiejo-Roman, K.M.; Samigullin, T.H.; Wilkström, N.; Troitsky, A.V. (2001). "Evolution of Lycopodiaceae Inferred from Spacer Sequencing of Chloroplast rRNA Genes". Russian Journal of Genetics. 37 (9): 1068–1073. doi:10.1023/A:1011969716528. S2CID 22187626.
Kenrick & Crane (1997a), p. 239.
Raymond, A.; Gensel, P. & Stein, W.E. (2006). "Phytogeography of Late Silurian macrofloras". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 142 (3–4): 165–192. Bibcode:2006RPaPa.142..165R. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.02.005.
Hetherington, A.J. & Dolan, L. (2018). "Stepwise and independent origins of roots among land plants". Nature. 561 (7722): 235–239. Bibcode:2018Natur.561..235H. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0445-z. PMC 6175059. PMID 30135586.
Hetherington, A.J. & Dolan, L. (2019). "Rhynie chert fossils demonstrate the independent origin and gradual evolution of lycophyte roots". Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 47: 119–126. Bibcode:2019COPB...47..119H. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.12.001. PMID 30562673. S2CID 56476813.
"Tropical fossil forests unearthed in Arctic Norway".
Stewart, Wilson N. & Rothwell, Gar W. (1993). Paleobotany and the Evolution of Plants (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 150–153. ISBN 978-0-521-38294-6.
Sahney, S.; Benton, M.J. & Falcon-Lang, H.J. (2010). "Rainforest collapse triggered Pennsylvanian tetrapod diversification in Euramerica". Geology. 38 (12): 1079–1082. Bibcode:2010Geo....38.1079S. doi:10.1130/G31182.1.
Moisan, Philippe & Voigt, Sebastian (2013). "Lycopsids from the Madygen Lagerstätte (Middle to Late Triassic, Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia)". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 192: 42–64. Bibcode:2013RPaPa.192...42M. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.12.003.
Lara-Pérez, L.A. & Valdés-Baizabal, M.D. (2015). "Mycorrhizal associations of ferns and lycopods of central Veracruz, Mexico". Symbiosis. 65 (2): 85–92. Bibcode:2015Symbi..65...85L. doi:10.1007/s13199-015-0320-8. S2CID 8550654.
Bacon, C.W. & Hinton, D.M. (2007). "Bacterial endophytes: the endophytic niche, its occupants, and its utility". In Gnanamanickam, S.S. (ed.). Plant-Associated Bacteria. Dorcrecht: Springer. pp. 155–194.
Zhu, D. (2010). "A novel endophytic Huperzine A-producing fungus, Shirai sp. Slf14, isolated from Huperzia serrata". Journal of Applied Microbiology. 109 (4): 1469–1478. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04777.x. PMID 20602655. S2CID 43582152.
Cobb, B. & Foster, L.L. (1956). A Field Guide to Ferns and their related families: Northeastern and Central North America with a section on species also found in the British Isles and Western Europe. Peterson Field Guides. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 215.