Hemitremia flammea (Source)
Superregnum: Eukaryota
Cladus: Unikonta
Cladus: Opisthokonta
Cladus: Holozoa
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Superphylum: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Megaclassis: Osteichthyes
Superclassis/Classis: Actinopterygii
Classis/Subclassis: Actinopteri
Subclassis/Infraclassis: Neopterygii
Infraclassis: Teleostei
Megacohors: Osteoglossocephalai
Supercohors: Clupeocephala
Cohors: Otomorpha
Subcohors: Ostariophysi
Sectio: Otophysa
Ordo: Cypriniformes
Subordo: Cyprinoidei
Familia: Leuciscidae
Subfamilia: Plagopterinae
Genus: Hemitremia
The flame chub (Hemitremia flammea) is a species of freshwater fish in the family Cyprinidae found only in the United States. Its range broadly follows the Tennessee River from above Knoxville, Tennessee, to the mouth of the Duck River. Historically the species was found in Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia.[2] The preferred habitat of flame chub is in small flowing streams often associated with springs.
Anatomy and appearance
The flame chub can be characterized by a deep caudal peduncle, short head and snout, small slightly subterminal mouth, and a barely compressed body. The dorsal fin originates slightly behind the pelvic fin origin. 7 - 8 anal soft rays, incomplete lateral line with 38 - 44 lateral scales, fewer than half of scales pored, pharyngeal teeth 2,5-4,2. Coloration is olive on the upper half of the body with a dark stripe along the back and dark streaks, bordered by a light stripe then black stripe ending at black caudal spot or wedge. White to red below, with bright scarlet along anterior third of body and at base of dorsal fin in large fish (primarily males) and silver peritoneum flecked with black. Males are more colorful than females, and both sexes are more colorful during spawning season.[3] Flame chubs can grow to a maximum of 7.8 centimeters (3.1 in) long.[4]
Geographic distribution
Due to habitat alteration and destruction, the flame chub currently has a patchy range. The species primarily occurs in the Tennessee River Valley from the Knoxville, Tennessee area downstream through Alabama to the mouth of the Duck River in Tennessee. The majority of the population in Alabama resides in the Highland Rim or Cumberland Plateau regions.[5] A single isolated population occurs in north Georgia in the Tiger Creek watershed of Catoosa County. In Alabama (which comprises approximately 50% of the remaining range of this species), only two populations are on public protected land, with the rest of the flame chub's habitat occurring on privately owned land. As such, the survival and further assessment of this species in Alabama is almost totally reliant on cooperation with private land owners.[6]
Ecology
While often cited by literature that the flame chub inhabits spring-fed streams, shallow seepage waters, and springs, usually over gravel in areas of abundant aquatic vegetation,[7][3] substrate the species found over can vary from bedrock to rubble to mud and may be found in areas of low flow near the bank of large streams.[8] A study by P. W. Shute notes that although the flame chub is often described as a spring-dwelling species, only 37 of 231 collection localities were springs.[citation needed] Despite this, the species can still be found primarily in association with spring heads, as most collection localities are found within watersheds that are fed by springs. Most documented records of this species are found in small streams. It has been hypothesized that this species is migratory within its range, either travelling from its native stream to headwaters for spawning, or existing in metapopulations with the springs serving as both sources for the stream localities and as refugia.[1] It has also been observed that adult flame chubs may aggregate in flooded fields and pastures for spawning.[7][5] Due to the fragile nature of springs and their tributaries, human expansion has caused further disjunction in the range of this already narrow endemic species.[6] As of 2014, IUCN considers this species to be Near Threatened due to ongoing threats from introduced non-native fish species and human habitat alteration.
The temperature of sampled streams where flame chubs are known to occur ranged from 24 °C (75 °F) in July to 8 °C (46 °F) in February.[6][8] TDS varied from 17 to 213 ppm, with a pH ranging from 6.4 to 8.2.[6] In 1990, Sossamon recorded that a flame chub population in east Tennessee was normally found associated with aquatic vegetation such as swamp smartweed, small pondweed, and watercress.[9] The flame chub almost exclusively (77-100% of the contents of the digestive tract) eats dipteran larvae and pupae. Gastropods, aquatic oligochaetes, hemipterans, and cladocerans are also taken occasionally. The occurrence of seeds, sand grains, and detritus in the gut of the flame chub indicates that flame chubs feed on or near the substrate.[8] In observations in aquaria, the flame chub pecks at the substrate.[10]
Life history
One Tennessee study of flame chub hatching found that hatching began in early May (and possibly earlier) and continued through late May.[11] Gravel is a very important factor in the breeding patterns of these fish, as it is necessary for filtration of extremely clean water as well as bottom stability for a species that spends a lot of its time in the benthos area of the stream.[12][13] No data are available pertaining to the species' lifespan.[4]
Conservation and management
This species is currently listed as near threatened according to the IUCN Red List.[1] A study done near Chattanooga, Tennessee showed that where oxygen levels were high, and where well-forested rocky watersheds were found, that the density of the Flame Chub as well as similar fish were much higher.[clarification needed][14] Habitat destruction is one of the main causes of the decline of this species.[citation needed] It is sensitive to alteration of its habitat, and is now extirpated from Kentucky, and close to extirpation in Georgia.[citation needed] A 2007 survey in north Alabama recovered flame chubs at only 19 of 53 localities that in the 1960s still had populations.[citation needed] Many sites were obviously degraded by forms of land use change such as putting a stream in a concrete culvert, or paving over part of a stream.
References
NatureServe (2014). "Hemitremia flammea". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2014: e.T9920A18234192. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-3.RLTS.T9920A18234192.en. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
"Hemitremia flammea". NatureServe Explorer An online encyclopedia of life. 7.1. NatureServe. Retrieved 29 December 2023.
Mayden, Richard L.; Page, Lawrence M.; Burr, Brooks M. (1992-08-18). "A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico". Copeia. 1992 (3): 920. doi:10.2307/1446175. ISSN 0045-8511. JSTOR 1446175.
Page, L.M. and B.M. Burr, 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 434 p.
Burr, Brooks M.; Eisenhour, David J.; Mettee, Maurice F.; O'Neil, Patrick E.; Pierson, J. Malcolm (1997-12-09). "Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin". Copeia. 1997 (4): 891. doi:10.2307/1447314. ISSN 0045-8511. JSTOR 1447314.
Stallsmith, B (2010-07-19). "Status of the flame chub Hemitremia flammea in Alabama, USA". Endangered Species Research. 12 (2): 87–93. doi:10.3354/esr00283. ISSN 1863-5407.
"Tennessee Valley Authority Eagle Bend 161-kV delivery point environmental assessment". 1993-02-05. doi:10.2172/10105296.
Boschung, Herbert T.; Hemphill, A. F. (1960-03-25). "Marine Fishes Collected from Inland Streams of Alabama". Copeia. 1960 (1): 73. doi:10.2307/1439866. ISSN 0045-8511. JSTOR 1439866.
Sossamon, Marcia (1990-12-01). "The Life History of the Flame Chub, Hemitremia flammea (Jordan and Gilbert), in Pond Creek, Loudon County, Tennessee". Masters Theses.
Maurakis, Eugene; Katula, Ray; Roston, William (2001-01-01). "Spawning Behavior in Hemitremia flammea (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae)". Virginia Journal of Science. 52 (4). doi:10.25778/xxrf-3z78. ISSN 0042-658X.
Bettoli, Phillip W.; Goldsworthy, Cory. 2011. Larval Fish Dynamics in Spring Pools in Middle Tennessee. Southeastern Naturalist: 145-154.
Lachner, EA. 1950. The Comparative Food Habits of the Cyprinid Fishes Nocomis bigguttatus and Nocomis micropogon in Western New York. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 40:229-236.
Etnier, D.A. and W.C. Starnes, 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. (pls. check date).
Long, J; Schorr, MS. 2005. Effects of watershed urban land use on environmental conditions and fish assemblages in Chattanooga area streams (Tennessee-Georgia). Journal of Freshwater Ecology: 527-537.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/"
All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License
