- Art Gallery -

Hylarana temporalis

Hylarana temporalis in amplexus (Information about this image)

Cladus: Eukaryota
Supergroup: Opisthokonta
Regnum: Animalia
Subregnum: Eumetazoa
Cladus: Bilateria
Cladus: Nephrozoa
Cladus: Deuterostomia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Infraphylum: Gnathostomata
Superclassis: Tetrapoda
Classis: Amphibia
Subclassis: Lissamphibia
Ordo: Anura
Subordo: Neobatrachia
Familia: Ranidae
Genus: Hylarana
Species: Hylarana temporalis

Name

Hylarana temporalis (Günther, 1864)

Type locality: "Ceylon" (= Sri Lanka).

Syntypes: BM 52.2.19.43-44, 58.10.15.5-6, 53.7.19.11 & 58.10.15.18.

Synonyms

* Rana flavescens Jerdon, 1854
* Hylorana temporalis Günther, 1864
* Hylorana flavescens — Jerdon, 1870
* Rana temporalis — Boulenger, 1882
* Rana (Hylorana) temporalis — Boulenger, 1920
* Rana (Hylorana) gracilis montanus Rao, 1922
* Rana (Hylorana) intermedius Rao, 1937
* Rana (Hylarana) temporalis — Dubois, 1987
* Rana (Sylvirana) temporalis — Dubois, 1992
* Hylarana temporalis — Chen, Murphy, Lathrop, Ngo, Orlov, Ho & Somorjai, 2005
* Sylvirana temporalis — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green & Wheeler, 2006
* Hylarana temporalis — Che, Pang, Zhao, Wu, Zhao & Zhang, 2007

References

* Günther, 1864, Rept. Brit. India: 427.
* Che, Pang, Zhao, Wu, Zhao, and Zhang, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 1-13.
* Frost, Darrel R. 2007. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.1 (10 October, 2007). Electronic Database accessible at [1] American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Hylarana temporalis . Accessed on 01 July 2008.
* 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN link: Hylarana temporalis (Near Threatened) Downloaded on 01 July 2008. (as Rana temporalis)

Vernacular names
Internationalization
English: Bronzed Frog

----------

The Bronzed Frog (Hylarana temporalis) is a frog species found in the riparian evergreen forests of the Western Ghats, India and the highlands of Southwestern Sri Lanka. They are found abundantly on or close to the ground near water. Individuals are not shy and react by jumping only when provoked. They are important prey of many species of snakes including the Malabar Pit Viper and the Vine Snake.


Physical Characteristics


Vomerine teeth (literally Teeth on the Vomer)are present in two oblique series that extend beyond the level of the hinder edge of the choanae. Head is depressed and triangular, snout subacuminate and prominent. The canthus rostralis is angular and loreal region nearly vertical and strongly concave. The Inter-orbital space is broad as the upper eyelid or rather broader in some cases. The tympanum is very distinct which is as large as the eye but sometimes a little smaller. Fingers are moderate wherein the first extends beyond the second. Toes are almost entirely webbed. Tips of fingers and toes are dilated into well- developed disks. Subarticular tubercles are well developed while the inner metatarsal tubercle is oval and blunt with a small round, outer metatarsal tubercle and no tarsal fold. The tibio-tarsal articulation reaches the nostril to the tip of the snout and sometimes a little beyond it. The skin of the individuals are smooth or finely granulate above with a narrow glandular lateral fold. While the dorsal regions are brown coloured, loreal and temporal regions, and sometimes also the sides of the body are dark brown in colour. A white labial band can also be seen. Limbs have dark cross bands. The ventral parts are typically white with the throat and breast more or less speckled with brown spots. Males have internal vocal sacs and an oval flat gland on the inner side of the arm.[2] Males also have a strong pad on the inner side of the first finger, covered during the breeding season with a greyish brown velvet-like horny layer.[3]

Etymology

The frogs' common name is derived from the small bronze coloured strips that appear on either side of the lower jaw, between the snout and the posterior point of the forelimbs within a week after metamorphosis.[4] The species has been referred to by several names including Hylarana malabarica(non-Tshudi),[5] Rana flavascens(Jerdon),[6] Rana malabarica(Gunther),[7] Hylorana malabarica(Gunther),[8] Hylorana temporalis(Gunther),[9]Hylorana flavescens(Jerdon),[10]Rana temporalis(Bouleng),[11] Sylvirana temporalis etc.

Distribution and habitat

H.temporalis is distributed throughout the Western ghat mountains of South India, along Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra at an elevation of 200–1800 m and the wet forests of southwestern Srilanka at an elevation of 60–1830m. The individuals are chiefly found on edges of rocky streams at low altitude. It sits exposed on flat rocks and stones and leaps, often to a considerable distance, into the water when disturbed.[12]

Breeding

The Bronzed Frog typically breeds along the edges of gently-flowing and/or in pockets of still water along the streams. The muddy colour of the tadpoles matches well with the substratum of the stream. The oral armature is well-suited for grazing at the bottom. In near permanent water, the tadpoles may have longer metamorphic duration (3–4 months)to enable body growth and emergence of larger/stronger froglets.[13]

Growth and Development

The tadpoles of H. temporalis start appearing in the streams by October till March. They are at least 11–14 mm long at metamorphosis and weigh about 100–170 mg. The larval duration varies from 90–120 days. The dorsal side of the tadpoles bear a muddy green/white/yellowish or olive brown colour while their lateral side is usually muddy. They carry a triangular snout with a single, sinistral and lateral Spiracle. Tail fin is transparent and pointed with moderately developed musculature. Slight pigmentation is visible on the skin of tail muscles and tail fins. The height of the dorsal fin is greater than the ventral fin. The teeth are blunt with the dental formula 2(2)/3(1). A characteristic yellowish brown strip is formed on the dorsal side between the snout and the posterior tip. On the lateral side, a black strip runs from the anterior to the posterior side of the body. Within a week of metamorphosis, small bronze coloured strips appear on either sides of the lower jaw, between the snout and the posterior point of the forelimbs. The bronze strips are interrupted below the forelimbs.[14]

Effects of Density and Kinship on Growth and Metamorphosis

Density can significantly influence growth and metamorphosis in many species of anurans like the Indian bull frog(Rana tigrina) and the toad B.melanostictus, including the Bronzed Frog. Studies show that generally growth rates, measured in terms of body mass, vary inversely with population density, and slowly growing individuals metamorphose at smaller sizes than their larger conspecifics. Growth and size at metamorphic climax were therefore inveresly correlated with density of rearing. Interestingly, presence of kin and non-kin also affects larval growth and metamorphosis. Larval growth where significantly greater when reared with siblings(crowded or uncrowded) compared to those reared with non-kin. Also variation in size was also lower in individuals reared in pure groups compared to those reared in mixed groups. In mixed groups, the spectrum of developmental stages were broader vis-a-vis pure groups.[15]

Behaviour

Microhabitat Choice

Following the south-west monsoon rains that lashes the Indian west coast from the first week of June, innumerable anuran species co-breed in ephemeral ponds and puddles.[16] This incidentally puts the individuals in severe intra- and interspecific competition for food and space and also to predation pressures. Microhabitat selection is therefore an important strategy employed by the anuran species including the Bronzed frog. Experiments show that tadpoles of R.temporalis which possesses a ventral mouth, predominantly prefers to occupy the substrate zone and that the number of individuals that exercise this preference is greater in the night than in daytime.[17]

Social Aggregation

Tadpoles of R. temporalis show social aggregation phenomenon. However, the nature and significance of this behaviour is yet to be understood.

Kin Recognition

Kin recognition is a phenomenon widespread in organisms as diverse as social insects, fishes, amphibians, birds, and mammals and even plants. Kin recognition behaviour in Bronzed Frog seems to be associated with growth regulation as their growth and metamorphosis is enhanced when reared with siblings than with non-siblings.[18]

Foraging Strategy

Ideal Free Distribution(IFD) refers to the idea that individuals of a species will distribute themselves amongs areas or patches in such a way that the average gain to all individuals is equal.[19] Studies have shown that tadpoles of Bronzed Frog exhibit IFD behaviour while foraging regardless of whether they are siblings of non-siblings in a group, which correlates well with their group-living strategy in nature.[20]

Food Perception

Studies on individual test tadpoles of Bronzed Frog suggest that food is detected based on chemical cues and not visually indicating that chemical perception predominates visual senses in R. temporalis tadpoles.[21]

References

1. ^ Biju et al. (2004). Rana temporalis. 2006. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. www.iucnredlist.org. Retrieved on 11 May 2006. Database entry includes a range map and justification for why this species is near threatened
2. ^ Boulenger, G. A.(1890) The Fauna Of British India:Reptilia and Batrachia
3. ^ Boulenger.G.A.,Records of the Indian Museum vol. 20(June 1920), p. 159 (Retrieved from Biological Heritage Library on 25th March 2010)
4. ^ N. C. Hiragond and S. K. Saidapur (1999) Description of tadpoles of Rana temporalis from Soth India;Curr. Sc. 76(3), 442-446
5. ^ Kelaart.Prod.Faun.Zeyl. I,p.192(1852)
6. ^ Journ.As.Soc.Beng. XXII,p.531(1854)
7. ^ Cat.Batr.Sal.p11(1858)
8. ^ op.cit.pp.131-142
9. ^ Rept.Brit.Ind.p427,pl. XXVI, fig.G(1864) and Proc.Zool.Soc.p.569(1875)
10. ^ Proc.As.Soc.Beng. p.83(1870)
11. ^ Cat.Batr.Ecaud.p63(1882) and Faun.Ind.Rept. p.459(1890)
12. ^ Boulenger.G.A.,Records of the Indian Museum vol. 20(June 1920), p. 159 (Retrieved from Biological Heritage Library on 25th March 2010)
13. ^ N. C. Hiragond and S. K. Saidapur (1999) Description of tadpoles of Rana temporalis from Soth India;Curr. Sc. 76(3), 442-446
14. ^ N. C. Hiragond and S. K. Saidapur (1999) Description of tadpoles of Rana temporalis from Soth India;Curr. Sc. 76(3), 442-446
15. ^ Girish S and Saidapur S K (1999) The Effects of density and kinship on growth and metamorphosis of the Bronze Frog (Rana temporalis) tadpoles; Acta Ethol 2 61-66
16. ^ Saidapur S K(1989) Reproductive cycles of Amphibians; in Repriductive Cycles of Indian Vertebrates pp166-224 ed. S K Saidapur
17. ^ Hiragond and Saidapur (2001) Microhabitat Choice of tadpoles of seven anuran species; Current Herpetol. 20, 51-60
18. ^ Girish S and Saidapur S K (1999) The Effects of density and kinship on growth and metamorphosis of the Bronze Frog (Rana temporalis) tadpoles; Acta Ethol 2 61-66
19. ^ Fretwell S D and Lucas H L Jr 1970 On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds; Acta Biotheor. 19 16–36
20. ^ Veeranagoudar D K, Shanbhag B A and Saidapur S K 2004 Foraging behaviour in tadpoles of the Bronze Frog Rana temporalis: Experimental evidence for the ideal free distribution; J. Biosci. 29 201–207
21. ^ Veeranagoudar et al., (2004) Mechanism of food detection in the tadpoles of the Bronze Frog Rana temporalis; Acta Ethol 7(1), 37-41.

Biology Encyclopedia

Amphibia Images

Source: Wikipedia, Wikispecies: All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License